1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
kerchoff and davis
compared attitudes and personalities of student couples in short term (under 18 mths) and long term (more than 18 mths)
filter theory definition
first exposed to a field of availables but to form relationships we narrow down into a field of desireables
social demography
similarity in attitudes
complementarity
level 1: social demography
similarity in terms of gender, proximity, ethnicity social class etc.
proximity: provides accessibility.
level 2: similarity in attitudes
important in development of relationships under 18 mths.
similarities/fundamental values to deeper communication
level 3: complementarity
important for long term relationships
we choose people who complement our traits.
e.g one person more submissive and other dominant.
forming a whole
limitation - temporal validity
poor temporal validity
people are more geographically movile and use online dating. (reduces proximity)
allows connections from different social backgrounds to form challenging social demography.
strength - supporting evidence
supported by evidence
taylor analysed marriage and found people that are significantly more likely to marry someone from their own ethnic group. supports social demography.
real world statistics to support
limitation - reductionist
cant explain why people remain in abusive relationships despite lacking similarity or why perfect matches fail. ignores emotional needs and life circumstances.
fails to capture relationship complexity, passion, forgiveness etc.
more holistic approach may be better in explaining.