1/12
Tracker October 2025
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Break down the LCATD acronym for NC contributions?
L- Literary
C- Character
A- Audience
T- Thematic/Theological
D- Doctrine
Contribution 1:
“Literary …?”
5 E:Gs
Readers focus on text, not distracted by “… issues”
Holistic unlike … criticism.
Not reliant on “…” source?
“artistry”
plot, structure, character development, themes, motifs.
“historical”
Form Criticism
“Q”
Contribution 2:
Nuanced
Insight into roles and portrayal of characters. 3 EGS:
Evokes a … from reader.
… and … characters —— ALSO WALK-ON AND FLAT CHARACTERS
Give E.G: of a disciple’s dynamic character, their faith journey and failures.
Peter, Pilate, Zacchaeus.
Response
Static, Dynamic
Peter’s denial and eventual restoration.
Contribution 3:
Goal ?
Understand evangelists’ … more
… Audience = initially perceived the text.
Helps … readers
Evokes…
Implied reader
Intentions
Implied
Modern
response
Contribution 4:
EG motif in Mark’s Gospel with OT connections from Isaiah
What gospel is there a concern for outcasts?
… analysis by understanding evangelists’ own way of presenting Jesus’ identity and mission in ways that address their own community’s needs. E.G: Luke’s Gentile audience.
“Suffering servant”
Luke
Thematic analysis
Contribution 5: Complements
Christians… the text
Guided by …
‘Divine Reading’ in Latin
interpret
the Holy Spirit
“Lectio Divina”
List all 5 limitations of Narrative Criticism.
1.) Devalues sacred texts
2.) Unsuitable approach for ancient texts.
3.) Theological/ Subjective bias
4.) Source criticism as an alternative.
5.) Historical Context at the time of writing and the author’s intentions would be different from today.
Limitation 1: Devalues sacred texts.
The Gospels are more than … and therefore, should not be analysed in this way.
Christianity is a … faith.
The Bible holds … and … truths
NC methods are derived from the work of …
Stories
Living
Historical and religious
fiction
Limitation 2: Unsuitable approach for Ancient texts
Scholar: Stanton (2002)
Modern writing methods were not known to ancient writers, it seems … to compare them to such.
Inappropriate
Limitation 3: Theological/ Subjective bias
Interpreter’s religious views can influence the analysis.
Leads to readings reinforcing particular doctrinal or ideological positions rather than objectively assessing the text’s literary and rhetorical features.
Nethercott (2018) says that it leaves the text too s… and open to over …
Subjective
Overinterpretation
Limitation 4: Source Criticism as an alternative
NC focuses too much on the … form of the work.
This can lead to an … understanding of the development and transmission of the gospel traditions.
… and … criticisms are offered as alternatives and provide complementary insights that narrative criticism might miss.
Final
Incomplete
Source and Redaction
Limitation 5: Historical Context at the time of writing and the author’s intentions would be different from today.
NC focuses on the text too much as a … piece of literature.
This might lead to … interpretations which are disconnected from “socio-historical” realities of the 1st century Mediterranean world.
E.g: Playing down necessity in understanding political and religious climate of 1st century Israel = vital knowledge.
standalone
radical
Intro/Concl points to make about Narrative Criticism with scholarly analysis…
Banks (2009)
Nethercott (2018)
Stanton (2002) - describes NC like studying a “film or novel”.
NC is often described as a child of redaction/composition criticism, takes further the investigation of the text itself.
NC all began with Hans Frei in 1974- breakthrough, he believed that narrative criticism offered a shift away from the traditional historical-critical approach.
Note: NC method analyses the Gospels as though they are in a set genre. HOWEVER, The Gospels have a unique genre of their own. They are not biographies, histories or fiction of any form.