1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
distribution of learning
rats, pigeons, fish, octopus, ants, snails, single celled organisms, plants
human learning
we can learn in our sleep
in sleep, presented pleasant or unpleasant smells - sniffing inc during REM and nREM sleep during pleasant vs unpleasant
changed behaviour to a high or low tone associated with smells - happened in waking hours too
definition of learning
no generally-accepted definition but
a relatively permanent change in behaviour as a consequence of experience
reflexes
fast and automatic
dont need brain - can use spinal cord
eg reflex arc
predictive relationships
many organisms live in environments that have predictive relationships between events - however predictive relationships may change (eg finding food in summer vs winter)
to survive animals must modify their behaviour as a consequence of their experience with the environment
learning is not just about responding to stimuli, its about predicting stimuli
habituation
the relatively persistent waning of a response as a result of repeated stimulation which is not followed by any kind of reinforcement
whitlow
vasoconstriction (blood volume) in rabbit ears in response to 1s 530 or 4000 hz tones
vasoconstriction in ears inc with stimulus, then when presented again the vasoconstriction was less, compared to a different stimulus - this diminished 150 post seconds
short term habituation effect
cross - music
neonatal rats split into a Mozart or Schoenberg group - 12 hour exposure per day to vocal or non-vocal selections for 52 days
had choice of entering a compartment of a box playing novel Mozart or shoenbergs music (15 days after exposure phase)
all Mozart and all shoenbergs still showed a significant amount going into the other music - showing habituation from exposure
domjam - water
water-deprived rats, into group S and group W
S = 30 min access to sweetened water then 30 mins water per day
W = 30 min just water per day
measured consumption each day across 20 days
rats are cautious about novel flavours (sensible, reduces chance of poisoning)
with experience diet can be widened through habituation
classical conditioning - pavlov
learning to associate and anticipate events
unconditioned stimulus US
biologically significant stimulus eg food/pain
Unconditioned response UR
response evoked by US
conditioned stimulus CS
previous neutral stimulus (eg bell, light) that acquires a respose by being paired with the US
conditioned response CR
response evoked by the CS
classical conditioning as learning
behaviour of pavlovs dogs changed in a relatively permanent fashion (acquired a CR) as a consequence of experience (pairing CS with US)
can describe different learning experiments with the same language
appetitive conditioning
US is pleasant
aversive conditioning
US is unpleasant
Martin and levey - human eye conditioning
when shown red block = nothing , when shown blue block = cornea air puff
CR = blinking
at first, little evidence of blinking during lights - then blinking elicited by CD that predicted the air puff (US)
functional - eyelid responses anticipate irritations and protects eye
trace conditioning with X rays as an aversive stimulus
experimental group training
rats allowed ro drink sucrose solution (CS) then given 1 dose of X radiation to induce nausea (US)
interval between CS and US varied between groups
control group training
same but X rays not delivered when button was pressed
choice between sucrose solution and water
control - liked sucrose
experimental - more time passed = more likely to have sucrose (6 hours still a conditioned response)
special form of conditioning?
conditioning when there is a substantial interval between CS and US, and when there was one CS-US pairing
maybe being able to to acquire an aversion quickly and over a long interval is functional, and maybe an adaptive specialisation
left vs right side of space
people put good things in their dominant side of space eg when ptps given cartoon animals described as good or bad, left handed people put the good one in the left box vice versa
people associate good things more strongly with the side of space they can interact with more fluently
peoples reach positive things with dominant hand, so it then is associated with positive things
presidential candidates use their dominant hand in debates to show positive things
3 features of classical conditioning
acquisition
extinction
spontaneous recovery
acquisition
the initial increase in responding to a CS when its pared with a US
extinction
the weakening of conditioned responding if the CS is subsequently presented without the US
spontaneous recovery
an increase in an extinguished conditioned response due to the passage of time
example of spontaneous recovery in rats
rats in a conditioning container, pellets = UCS
during conditioning, learning took place over the first 6 days
during extinction, they slowly recovered each day throughout the 9 trials
exposure therapy
if a stimulus has a maladaptive response, you can break the connection between the stimulus and the behaviour through extinction - repeat several times
generalisation
4 groups of pigeons had different wl of light paired with food - 530, 550, 580, 600nm
conditioned response: pecking key light
pigeons still relatively successful in pecking when WLs were similar - generalisation - then discrimination the further away it gets
Blough (1975)
neurons conditioned to certain stimulus, the further along the wavelength you get, some still activated but som are not
who did instrumental conditioning
thorndike
instrumental conditioning
contingent upon behaviour of the animal
the law of effect
of several responses made to the same situation, accompanied or closely followed by satisfaction to the animal will be more firmly connected to the situation
S-R
associations are formed between a stimulus and response
reinforcement merely strengthens S-R association
thorndike
cats would take 60-120s to escape, then 20s after a dozen trials
continuous reinforcement
reward delivered every time animal makes a response
ratio/fixed schedule
reward is delivered after a certain number of responses are made
fixed vs variable (changes after each trial)
interval schedule
reward delivered after first response is made after a certain interval is passed
foxed vs variable
instrumental conditioning
widespread - all manner of species can be trained to jump or swim through loops for reward
sometimes hard to get started if they dont respond initially - use shaping - successive approximations until desired response
why do we have a conservative approach to learning?
physiology - brains are made of connections between neurons
ockhams razor - simplest explanation is best
items of association for thorndike
only thing rats would be aware of is if they see a lever, to press it (according to law of effect) - has no knowledge that its action is followed by food
Adams
stage 1: lever press → sugar pellet
stage 2: sugar pellet → illness (or control - sugar pellet or illness separated by a lot of time)
100 presses: exp group were more reluctant to press lever - contradicts thorndike (shouldn’t know consequence of behaviour is illness)
500 presses: more likely to press lever than control - more conditioning - devaluation more successful - agrees with thorndike
what does Adams experiment imply
something not present is influencing behaviour
conditioning results in a representation or image being activated
can a representation/ an image of something not present also be conditioned
holland
stage 1: tone = food 1 // light = food 2
stage 2: tone → illness (food 1)
avoided food 1 - animals can learn to associate things that are there in the world with things in their mind