1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Men superior to women
Aristotle
influential to western views
scientific approach
naturally inferior
right for men to rule women
women submit
in same way NATURAL for non-human animals to be governed by humans
conclusion from observing how women in society behaved
“the m is higher, the f is lower, that the male rules and female is ruled”
Aquinas
13C Summa Theologica
women inferior in physical strength and intelligence
created by God this way
part of natural variety and order of world
x bc eve, since creation
“defective”
special high place in heaven for women e.g. VM who waited at foot of cross when J crucified
commended for love of God
men and women = diff but equal worth
mainstream
all equal in sight of God
complementary characteristics which equal each gender for diff complementary roles
occupations
some C argue diff skills = women shouldn’t be priests/ positions of authority
shouldn’t have role where represent Christ e.g. blessing eucharist
Cat and Ort. churches
J chose men as disciples
God came to world as man, only man can represent him in sacraments
denom that do ordain women
argue God calls ppl to ministry without gender discrimination
e.g. CoE
women superior to men
unambitious to aim to be equal to men
fem theo Mary Daly: women’s abilities and knowledge superior to men
believes women ought to govern world, would result in > peaceful society and better for environment
families
“alternatives are on average worse, especially if they are systematically generalised” Don Browning - “World Family Trends”
2 parent biological family genearlly best, but not all biological fathers and moterhs competent parents
social scientists understand family = social institution
pattern of behaviour well established in society
performs function
social unit where each member has role and gains sense of belonging
work well = everyone protected and supported
family performs function
e.g. care of young children and elderly
some work, others domestic tasks
everyone shares benefit of wage and clean home
family = culturally/ socially determined
e.g. industrialised society tend to live in smaller family units
do diff kinds of work in diff parts of country
unusual in UK for 1 houshold to have several gen
> rural areas, tend to live i nlarger family units
men - hunting, women - care for children, grow crops and prepare food
many societies divide work by gender outside and within family unit
🙂 family culturally/ socially conditioned
nothing wrong with what constitutes normal family changing as society changes
e.g. homosexuality
if societygives women equal rights in workplace, nothign wrong with roles of household canging so man stays at home and woman goes to worl
/ both work
☹ family = culturally/ socially conditioned
C: family created by God
family = gift/ sacrement, ideal way of life
rules of God shouldn’t change
views on ideal of heterosexual couple/ hierarchical family life should be preserved
changes to families in modern society
decline in marriage
cohabiting couples grew by 29.7% between 2004-2014
fastest growing type of family in uk
law allowed same-sex marriages in 2014
just after, 4850 same-sex marriages
decline in religious wedding ceremonies
feminism and C church
incompatible = abandon (Daly)
need changes to be made within structure of C practice, worship, leadership to give women > equality (Ruether?)
focus on God as feminine, motherhood
societal change
1928 women allowed to vote on equal footing to men
early 1960s birth control
1967 Abortion Act
OT gender roles - equal
Genesis
‘created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; m and f he created them’
‘Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it’
have same roles and responnsibilities - reproduction, stewardship
Proverbs
A capable wife
“she gets up while it is still night”
“she provides food for her family”
“out of her earnings hse plants a vineyard”
very capable - successful
equal worth
(still helper bc bolstering husband, but still partnership, still important in relationship)
OT gender roles - men superior
Genesis
“helper” for Adam
‘then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man’
man = source of woman’s creation
helper for men
‘I will make your pains in childbearing very sever; with painful labour you will give birth to children. Your desire will be or your husband, and he will rule over you’
women role = submit to husband
Luke gender roles
Mary and Martha
“Mary has chosen what is better and it will not be taken away from her”
J’s ministry sought to challenge and change society
traditional gender roles challenged
Mary - faithful disciples praised
women’s faith just as important
Ephesians - St Paul gender roles
‘submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the Church’
“head” either = husband has authority over life
OR = “source of life” (Gen from rib)
emphasis on relationship rather than authority
OR Christ’s headship manifested thru his death
marital relationship = echo of Christ’s words: “love one another, as I have loved you” (John)
man becomes head of wife IF loves wife enough to be willing to die for her
unlike household rules of Romans/ Greeks
C rules ordered by principle of love
husbands must never harm wife’s dignity
St Paul’s words gender roles
Galatians
“there is no diff between Jew and Gentiles, between slaves and free ppl, between men and women, you are all one in Christ Jesus'“
equal
Corinthians
“women should remain silent in the churches”
not allowed to express ideas/ have authority, subordinate to men
Timothy
“anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own houshold, has denied fiath and is worse than an unbeliever”
Cons Prot gender roles and feminism
critical of “liberal ideologies”
= family breakdown, destabilising of society and traditional values
fem → confused gender roles
unrealistic expectations
disappointment and disssatisfaction
social lib and fem (sec and C forms) = increased divorce, dysfunctional families and sexual immoraltiy (esp. homosexuality)
“corrupt” young minds and undermine “American dream” (happy and prosperous nation)
equal but diff
gender roles ordered by God in creation and after fall
Cons prot motherhood and parenthood
women → wife and mother → create domestic heaven so husband can escape from external role
strong
=/= position of weakness
Eve name = “mother of all living things”
1st mother
similarly, mother’s role = bring life itno world, nurture and lead to knowledge and love of God
Timothy: woman wrking outside home → diminishes man’s role and responsibilities to wife
Proverbs - a capable wife
woman may work given doesn’t itnerfere with domestic duties
Cons Prot types of family
heterosexual
Bible’s account of order of creation
research published by McLanahan and Sandefur (USA 1994)
children do < well edcuationally and couples < happy in blended families, single parent families, same-sex, non-married cohabitating
critical of contemporary sec fem and social trends
e.g. rise in cohabitation and same-sex relationships
→ eroticisation of W society
e.g. Foucault: love = pleasure, =/= committment
relationships have become too private and egocentric
not outward looking to church attendance and contributing to society
couples expect too much from relationships
C marriage has permanent clear roles = stronger reason to make families work
Catholic response
applauds fem → raises dignity
BUT suspicious of secular agenda, diminishes gender diff between men adn women
diminishes gender diff between men and women
Pope Francis
gave women right to vote in synod of bishops
vatican body that gathers world’s bishops for periodic meetings
upheld ban on ordaining women as priests
appointed several women to high-ranking Vatican positions (but not dicasteries)
Mulieris Dignitatem
letter by Pope JPII “On the dignity and vocation of women” (1988)
set out to correct gender roles
references bible, church tradition and NL
focus on paradigm of Mary, Mother of God and theotokos (God-bearer)
M → special role of women in salvation
birthed JC, illustrates human virtues of obedience and dignity for m and f
M.D. on gender roles
response to fem accusations of patriarchy
BOTH imago dei
=/= man = active principle, woman = passive
BOTH equal and active BUT in diff ways
woman → wife and mother
man = head, but marriage = mutual relationship of equals
“head” =/= dominion
women take m roles = confuse genders
“dangerous effects”
undermine dignity as mother
BUT protect women’s rights which protect dignity, esp. those abused/ marginalised
rejects gender as entirely culturally and environmentally determined
M.D. on motherhood and parenthood
women’s unique role
shift in social attitudes to women’s equality = +ve
rejects fem notion: motherhood = demeaning
diff to fem Beauvoir and Freidan
Mary = model of motherhood (special value from God)
Mystery of gen
ordained by God, allowed by power of HS
special gift of having child: visibly 1 flesh
mutuality
active motherhood: man learns from mother
“his nature not psychologically predisposed to parenthood”
M.D. on types of families
sociological evidence → children need to be raised in intact families (heterosexual and married)
psychologically stronger
Catechism rejects cohabitation
“human love does not tolerate “trial marriages””
x same-sex marriages
Cat Fem responses to gender roles
arose with 2nd wave of fem
inspired to reform
=/= sec fem (church essentially flawed) BUT teachings have become institutionally patriarchal
wish reformed church to have bigger role in society, x purely secular views on family and developing C spirituality which enhances gender relationships
church consciously and unconsciously written women out of C history
in 1st C communities, women played equally significant role to men
Elisabeth Schuessler Fiorenza: women leaders e.g. Priscilla (Acts), Phoebe (Romans)
“our heritage is our power”
Catharina Halkes: J’s teaching on KoG requires spiritual transformation
f = learn to develop gift of care into public spher
m = give up privileged sense of entitlement and learn virtue of care every day
Cat Fem responses to motherhood and parenthood
motherhood overly romanticised
= option =/= burden
difficulty in M.D.: focus on motherhood
underlying patriarchal basis
guilt women → work outside family → bad wife/ mother
Cat Fem responses to non-traditional families
Mary as model of human and womanly purity
BUT 1st Cent, younger girl of marriageable age still virgin =/= virtuous = failure
for Latin American single parent families
Mary = inspiration
failure, but remains open to God and finds spiritual strength to create and sustain family
seek to broaden Church’s narrow view → > inclusive, < judgement
lib prot C responses to gender roles
> ready to accept secular insights of sociologists, psychologists, biologists
interpret Bible = sourcebook of experience, =/= revelation
Bible covenant to focus on what means to be human in relationship with God
e.g. fem and Foucault right to liberate gender from sex
from controlling power of Church
find own identity in society and family
if there is “no longer m and f”
can have same-sex parents/ diff allocated roles
BUT sex not just about physical pleasure, focus on friendship, companionship and love
lib prot responses to motherhood and parenthood
no imperative to aspire to parenthood
not all adults make very good parents
better to seek diff vocation
Mary Mother of Chirst as symbol of womanhood = stereotypical
shouldn’t simply dismiss moral, spiritual, emotional benefits of parenthood
non-traditional families
J’s ministry demonstrated that KoG based on new social order
> inclusive, non-hierarchical, non-judgemental
ministry aimed at marginalised e.g. women and sexual outsiders
J’s example - > flexible
“justice love”
evidence from sociologists e.g. Jessie Barnard
important point = children feel loved, secure and provided for
never been 1 kind of family
NT: C family also refer to all members of C community (church)
related thru love and faith not kinship
conservative C view too restrictive
> realistic and supportive needed
family life not easy
🙂 cons prot
equal value
stability - clear roles
consistent with Bible
high moral standard
+ve environment for children
flourishing
☹ cons prot
p on women
refusal to adapt to modern society → dividing numbers
women’s role → motherhood rather than own value
very limited options for life
literal interpreation of biblical text - always flawed
🙂 lib prot
not literal → correct → Bible inconsistent → > flexible → > pratical
can uphold J’s ministry
own role and identity, freedom
not everyone meant to be parents
diff callings
alr famly, just be disciples to J
parenthood = choice =/= obligation
emphasis on J’s ministry - inclusivity, justice
> realistic
focus on what it means to be human in relation to God rather than fixed social hierarchies
faith, religion > gender roles
☹ lib prot
diminishes power and value of church
too individualistic
C religion = community
Bible =/= ultimate source of info and value
can lead to radical approaches to genders
impractical
change requires consensus
ends up being secualr, not religious view
uses clear and absolute guidance on gender roles
can cause confusion
🙂 Catholic
bestows significant dignity and importance on woman’s role as mother
clarity
consistent with Cat tradition
M.D. focus = woman
husband helps her in parenthood, he learns from her
NB - Ephesians
☹ Catholic
Mary = 1 example =/= correct path
could cause guilt
discriminatory to women and same sex couples
many women in gospels and in early church held importance without being mother
assumes men not suited to being parents
🙂 fem cat
acknowledges women that played significant roles in 1st C communities
motherhood = option, gift =/= burden
re-evaluate while retaining C
x secular
relies on biblical teachings
St Paul and evidence from origins of C faith - Phoebe
recognises patriarchal roots of church practices
can be woman and be catholic - retain faith
☹ cat fem
still challenge to cat tradition - rejects key teachings of m.d.
unrealistic expectations to request/ require cat teachings to change - cannot
true, universal, eternal
internal conflcit undermines cat church