1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Helping behavior
Any action intended to benefit another person
Altruism
A motive to increase another’s welfare without conscious regard for one’s own self-interest
Social-exchange theory
The idea that helping behavior is driven by maximizing rewards and minimizing costs
External vs internal rewards of helping
Social approval, praise, recognition; Increased self-worth, positive emotions
Do-good feel-good effect
Helping others boosts mood and self-esteem
Negative-state relief model
Helping reduces negative emotions like guilt or distress
Guilt and helping
People help to relieve guilt and restore self-image
Mood and helping
Happy people are more likely to help
Reciprocity norm
Expectation that people will help those who have helped them
Social-responsibility norm
Expectation that people should help those in need
Social capital
Mutual support and cooperation within a social network
Attribution and helping
People are more likely to help others when they attribute a need to uncontrollable external causes (like misfortune) rather than controllable internal causes (like lack of effort)
External vs internal attribution (helping)
Leads to sympathy and helping; Leads to less sympathy and less helping
Kin selection
Helping relatives to increase survival of shared genes
Group selection
Helping group members increases group survival
Types of prosocial behavior
Reciprocal helping and unconditional helping
Empathy
Experiencing another person’s feelings
Empathy-altruism hypothesis
Empathy produces genuine altruism
Egoistic vs Altruistic helping
Driven by self-interest, such as gaining praise or reducing personal distress vs helping is aimed solely at increasing another's welfare
Bystander intervention
Helping behavior in the presence of others
Kitty Genovese case (bystander effect)
A young woman was killed outside of her apartment and her murder was said to have 38 witnesses, none of which intervened. This sparked the study of the bystander effect.
Bystander effect
People are less likely to help when others are present
Decision-tree model of helping (5-step process for helping behavior)
1) Notice the event
2) Interpret the event as an emergency
3) Assume the responsibility
4) Know what to do
5) Make the decision to help
Pluralistic ignorance
People misinterpret others’ lack of reaction as absence of emergency
Normative influence (helping)
Fear of embarrassment prevents action
Informational influence (helping)
Looking to others to define situation
Diffusion of responsibility
Reduced personal responsibility in groups
Assuming responsibility study (how does a direct request influence helping likelihood?)
Direct request increases helping dramatically
Cost of helping
Higher perceived risk reduces helping
Time pressure effect
People in a hurry are less likely to help
Prosocial modeling
Seeing others help increases helping
Similarity and helping
People are more likely to help similar others
Internal and external influences on helping
Mood, guilt, personality; Social norms, bystanders, and time pressure
Gender and helping
Men help more in dangerous situations; women help more in nurturing situations
Religiosity and helping
Religious individuals show more prosocial behavior
Good Samaritan study (how time pressure affects helping likelihood)
Time pressure strongly affects helping behavior
How to increase helping
Reduce ambiguity, increase responsibility, model helping
Labeling effect
Calling someone “helpful” increases future helping
Moral exclusion
Viewing some groups as outside moral concern
Modeling altruism
Observing helping increases helping behavior
Learning by doing
Performing helpful acts increases self-perception as helpful
Overjustification effect
External rewards reduce intrinsic motivation to help