ap gov required court cases

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:38 PM on 4/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

14 Terms

1
New cards

Marbury v Madison

Establishes the power of Judicial Review

2
New cards

McCulloch v Maryland

  • establishes the concept of implied powers and federalism

3
New cards

US v Lopez

significantly limited Congress's power under the Commerce Clause

4
New cards

Engel v Vitale

government bodies cannot compose or endorse official prayers, reinforcing the strict separation of church and state in public institutions

5
New cards

Wisconsin v Yoder

reinforced the freedom of religion

The Court ruled that freedom of religion takes precedence over state education

6
New cards

Tinker v Des Moines

The court ruled that school officials cannot ban student speech based on suspicion that it might disrupt the learning environment

7
New cards

New York Times v US

reinforced the principle of freedom of the press, establishing that the government cannot exercise prior restraint on publications, even in cases of national security.

8
New cards

Schenck v US

limits freedom of speech to a degree; First Amendment does not protect speech that creates a “clear and present danger

9
New cards

Gideon v Wainwright

Guaranteed the right to an attorney in felony criminal cases; incorporates the 6th amendment.

10
New cards

McDonald v Chicago

incorporating the Second Amendment right to bear arms at the state level.

11
New cards

Brown v Board of Education

Overturns “separate but equal” prohibits racial segregation in public schools, also overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, significant milestone in the civil rights movement.


12
New cards

Citizens United v FEC

  • Unlimited spending on political campaigns by private corporations constitutes free speech protected by the First Amendment.

13
New cards


  • Baker v Carr

Develops the “one person, one vote” argument and allows challenges to congressional redistricting.

14
New cards

Shaw v Reno

Prohibits the use of race as the sole factor in redistricting under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment