tx preparation: beam-modifying devices

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/54

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:11 PM on 6/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

55 Terms

1
New cards

when would standard hand blocks be used

palliative cases

2
New cards

what is a major disadvantage of a hand block

non divergent vertical edges

3
New cards
4
New cards

what is more efficient than MLC in attenuation of the beam

custom blocks

5
New cards

how many HVL do standard blocks need to have

5

6
New cards

what percent of the beam will be attenuated with a custom block

at least 95% of the beam

7
New cards

what are the 4 components of cerrobend

bismuth, lead, tin, cadium

8
New cards

what is the melting point of cerrobend

158F

9
New cards

what percent of the thickness of cerrobend attenuated the beam when compared to the same thickness of lead

85%

10
New cards

how much thicker should a cerrobend block be more than lead

20%

11
New cards

when are secondary electrons produced from the beam

when the photon beam interacts with materials in its path

12
New cards

how much should photon blocks be from the patient during treatment

15cm

13
New cards

why should photon blocks be 15cm from the pt

avoid electron contamination and maximize clearance around the pt

14
New cards

where is the lead width measured in MLCs

isocenter

15
New cards

which blocks will still provide the sharpest beam field edge

custom cerrobend blocks

16
New cards

how much leakage do you want no more transmitted through the beam

2%

17
New cards

how much leakage do you not want transmission between the leafs

4%

18
New cards

what is the goal of MLC in static mode

beam shaping

19
New cards

what is the goal of MLC in dynamic mode

deliver IMRT

20
New cards

what jaws only the dynamic capability

y jaw

21
New cards

what are some negatives of MLC shaping

limit field size, inter and intra leaf leakage, divergence at ends of leaf

22
New cards

why do we rotate the collimator with MLCs

shape field based on MLC motion leaf, get jaw in right orientation with dynamic wedge, avoid inter leaf leaks in same place

23
New cards

what percent of leakage between leafs

3-5%

24
New cards

where is primary collimator

head of gantry

25
New cards

what is the secondary collimation

jaws

26
New cards

what is the third collimation

leaves

27
New cards

which collimations are adjusted by user

2nd and 3rd

28
New cards

how is the beam shape when in primary collimation

circular

29
New cards

what are three ways of shielding critical structures

collimator (jaws), custom cerrobend block, MLC

30
New cards

where are lead shields place

directly on skin

31
New cards

what does wax coating do on lead shields

absorb secondary scatter

32
New cards

how do you find out the thickness of lead

E/2 + 1

33
New cards

where must cerrobend blocks be mounted on

cone

34
New cards

what percent of the beam needs to be attenuated with the thickness of cerrobend block

97% of the beam

35
New cards

what distance is needed for cerrobend blocks from the skin and why

5-10cm so scatter from block is minimal

36
New cards

what has allowed us to adjust for irregular surface topography and their results shifts in dose to underlying structure

IMRT

37
New cards

what are two reasons that compensators are used in electrons

accommodate surface irregularities and reduce depth of electron beam

38
New cards

what two things should be verified before compensators are added

they are placed correctly in the beam and that the desired and resulting isodose distributions agree

39
New cards

what material does bolus need to be equivalent too

tissue

40
New cards

what does bolus need to conform to

treatment surface

41
New cards

can bolus material be used as a tissue compensator

yes

42
New cards

does the addition of all tx accessories change the MUs required

yes

43
New cards

what are wedges used for

attenuate the beam progressively across the field

44
New cards

what are physical wedges made of

lead, brass, stell, or tungsten

45
New cards

where is the central axis on a wedge

central axis of the wedge

46
New cards

where is most of the physical wedge attenuate most of the beam

heel

47
New cards

where is no attenuation at in the dynamic wedge

toe

48
New cards

what is often required for dynamic wedges

collimator rotation

49
New cards

what is the field size limitations with dynamic wedges

40 × 30

50
New cards

what is the wedge angle

angle which specific isodose line is bent in relationship to central axis

51
New cards

what is hinge angle

angle between the central axis of two beams

52
New cards

what increases as hingle angle decreases

dose in overlapping areas

53
New cards

what isodose line is turned where it gives the wedge angle from

50%

54
New cards

when will you see more reason to add wedge

as the hinge angle decreases

55
New cards

what is the wedge angle formula

(180 - hinge)/2