1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Current Ratio =
Current Assets/Current Liabilities
Quick Ratio =
Current Assets - Inventory/ Current Liabilities
Current Ratio should be greater than
1
Quick Ratio chooses to
remove inventory from current assets as it is seen as illiquid
Quick Ratio can be seen as
more cautious and more prudent
If the Current Ratio increases YoY, either
current assets have increased
current liabilities have decreased
Potential Causes of Increased Current Ratio
New Long Term Loans
Disposal of a NCA for cash
Unusually large sale at YE
PPE is classed as a
non current asset - therefore, not in the current ratio
Inventory will always be
smaller than trade receivables, as trade receivables sell inventory at a profit.
Risks of Misstatement with the Eario
Misstated Trade Receivables - irrecoverable debts
Misstated Inventory - Wrong Price/Unit
Misstated Trade Payables - Wrong Year
Long Term Solvency is
a company’s ability to meet its long term financial obligations
e.g. debt repayment
Gearing Ratio =
Net Debt/Equity x 100
Gearing Ratio - Net Debt
Borrowings - Cash Owned
any interest bearing debt
overdrafts
long/short term loans
Gearing Ratio - Equity
total equity
share capital
share premium
retained earnings
revaluation surplus
Gearing Ratio Increases
Debt = increased
Equity = decreased
Gearing Ratio Increased - Potential Causes:
Changed by Impairment on NCA (equity will go down)
Changed by a large dividend being paid
Changed by new finance
Changed by large cash purchase
Gearing Ratio Decrease - Potential Causes:
Changed by Revaluation
Changed by share issue
Gearing Ratio - Risks of Misstatement:
Going Concern
Existence of Covenants - motive to understated liabilities/overstate cash/overstate equity
Inappropriate revaluation of NCA
Long Term Solvency Ratios:
Gearing
Interest Cover
Interest Cover Equation =
Profit before Interest Payable/Interest Cost
Interest Cover is
often linked to debt covenants
better if the number is higher!
Interest Cover - Motive for Manipulation
Interest can be understated
Profit can be overstated and recognised too early
Efficiency Ratios
Inventory Period
Trade Receivable Period
Trade Payables Period
Inventory Period =
Inventories x 365 / COS
Increase in the Inventory Period - Potential Causes
Increase in stock due to a big sale in the next year
Change in how Inventory is valued (AVCO to FIFO)
If prices are rising during the year, FIFO is more likely to
give you a higher value for the inventory
Increase Inventory Period - Risk of Misstatement
Overvalued Inventory
Inclusion of non-existent inventory
Inappropriate change in cost estimation
Trade Receivable Period =
Trade Receivables/Revenue x 365
Trade Receivables Increase - Potential Causes
Collection Problems
Large Sale at the YE on credit
Change in customer base/terms
Trade Receivables Increase - Risk of Misstatement
Omitted Bad Debt Expense
Errors in Revenue Recognition
Errors in Revenue Cut Off
Non-Existent Trade Receivables recognised at YE
Trade Payables Period =
Trade Payables/ COS or Credit Purchases x 365
Trade Payables - Decrease Potential Causes
Suppliers have changed their terms
Large payment made just before the YE
Trade Payables - Decrease Risks of Misstatement
Recognition of Invoices in the Wrong Year
Missing/Incomplete Trade Payables at YE
PLANNING - Benefits of Analytical Procedures
Material/Risk areas can be identified
Items which look odd can be considered further
Highlight Errors not picked up before
Uses Information outside of the Accounting records
Assists in understanding the client’s business
PLANNING - Limitations of Analytical Procedures
Good knowledge of the business is required to understand results
Consistency of results may conceal a material error
Tendency to carry out procedures mechanically, without professional scepticism
An experienced member of staff to complete
Reliable data may not be available