1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are complicity-based conscience claims?
Religious exemptions from laws regarding sex, reproduction, and marriage on grounds that law makes objector complicit in others’ sins
What happened in Burwell v Hobby Lobby?
Hobby Lobby objected to providing employees health insurance plans covering contraception under Affordable Care Act
Supreme Court believed government had other means of ensuring women’s access to affordable contraception
Thus, plaintiff’s religious views could be accommodated and cause 0 harm to defendants
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Central free exercise claims don’t hurt any 3rd party
Ex in Wisconsin v Yoder where they didn’t want to send Amish kids to secondary school
Complicity-based conscience claims’ effect on 3rd party
Oriented to 3rd parties who don’t share claimant’s beliefs about conduct, which can impose harm on the condemned
Supreme Court rejected exemption claims that would impose employer’s religion on employees, invalidating accommodations that impose burdens on 3rd parties