Ethnic DEA- external factors

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:44 PM on 4/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

Wood

Found evidence of racism in job selection processes and therefore poverty amongst ethnic minorities is the result of racism in the job market.

2
New cards

Mason

Poverty in ethnic minorities is a result of structural racism.

3
New cards

Archer

Chinese British students said that racism from peers was an everyday experience.

4
New cards

Iberi

Racism in wider society led to African students to strive for success at school.

5
New cards

Evaluation of racism in wider society

Arguably a 'March of Progress' has occurred- there is less racism/ increase in equality of opportunity- as a result of changes in social attitudes and anti-discrimination laws. This links to material deprivation.

6
New cards

Platt

For all ethnic groups, those on FSM do not achieve as highly as those not on FSM. Ethnic groups with higher average wages such as Chinese have higher educational achievement. Bangladeshis achieve highly despite lower average wages.

7
New cards

Iberi

For all African students poverty acts as a catalyst to do well in education. Ethnic minority students are 2x more likely to be living in poverty than white British students with Pakistani and Bangladeshi being the most likely to be in poverty- over 50% in poverty.

8
New cards

Criticisms of material factors

Material deprivation cannot explain all the Ethnic DEA, for e.g. Indian and Chinese pupils who are materially deprived do better than most. For example, in 2011 86% of Chinese girls on FSM achieve 5 or more higher grade GCSEs-higher than other ethnic groups, including those not on FSM.

9
New cards
10
New cards

Modood

Wealth has less of an impact on ethnic minorities achievement than white british as it is less of an indicator of the education of the parents.

11
New cards

Archer

Chinese parents place a high value on education and are competitive with other ethnicities

12
New cards

Basit

Indian and Pakistani parents saw free education as a 'blessing'- they placed a high value on children's education.

13
New cards

Sewell

Blames the lack of achievement amongst African Caribbean boys students on the lack of a father figure and high levels of single mums, he argues boys turn to gangs without the discipline from their fathers. He sees family structure and stability as important for a child's education.

14
New cards

Lupton

Teachers reported poorer behaviour from white working class students than other ethnic groups, this was blamed on a lack of parental support.

15
New cards

DfE

Students who speak English as a second language did better in the EBacc than students who had English as their first language.

16
New cards

Moon and Ivins

Parental involvement was much higher among ethnic minorities than white British as they did not see it as the schools responsibility. 24% of all university applications are from ethnic minority students despite making up 18% of the population. Ethnic minority parents are much better at pushing their children into higher education.

17
New cards

Criticisms of cultural factors

It is a victim blaming explanation for differences in educational achievement.

Sewell puts the responsibility of educational attainment on ethnic groups themselves and diverts attention away from the real causes of Ethnic DEA- a racist society, institutional racism in schools and material deprivation.