1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
When can we assume row sum, col sum and diagsum are all the same in a double series?
When all terms are non negative (≥0 )
What does it mean for a series Cn to be a rearrangement of An
there exists a bijective function f:N∪{0}→N∪{0}
such that cn=af(n)
Whats the nullity test for divergence?
If an→0 as n→∞, the series is divergent.
Whats the algebra of infinite sums?
If an is convergent with sum s and bn is convergent with sum T, then ∀λ,μ∈R ∑n=1∞(λan+μbn) is convergent with sum λS+μT
What does it mean for a series to be absolutely convergent?
If \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left|an\right|<+\infty
What is the absolute convergence theorem and the Infinite Triangle Inequality?
Suppose that ∑n=1∞an is absolutely convergent. Then:
there are non-negative pn,qn such that \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}p_{n}<+\infty,\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}q_{n}<+\infty and an=pn−qn for all n.
∑n−1∞an is convergent
∣∑n=1∞an∣≤∑n=1∞∣an∣ (infinite triangle inequality).
Whats a conditionally convergent series?
Convergent but not absolutely convergent
Whats the alternating series test?
Let a1,a2,…≥0 be a decreasing sequence which tends to 0. Then the series a1−a2+a3−a4+…=∑n=1∞(−1)n+1an is convergent.
Proof that ColSum, RowSum and DiagSum are all equal for a non-negative double series
Let sp,q be the sum of the finite (p+1)×(q+1) rectangle. Looking at columns, each column sum inside the rectangle is at most the full column sum, so sp,q≤ColSum0+⋯+ColSumq≤C.
Now fix p and let q→∞. Then sp,q→∑m=0pRowSumm, so ∑m=0pRowSumm≤C for every p.
Thus all partial sums of R are bounded above by C.
Since the terms are non-negative, the Upper Bound Test gives R≤C.
Next apply exactly the same argument to the transposed array bm,n′=bn,m. This swaps rows and columns, so we get C≤R. Hence R=C.
Finally, form the shifted array b0,000⋮amp;b0,1amp;b1,0amp;0amp;⋮amp;b0,2amp;b1,1amp;b2,0amp;⋮amp;⋯amp;⋯amp;⋯amp;⋱. Its row sums are the same as the original row sums, but its column sums are exactly the diagonal sums of the original array. Applying the already proved result R=C to this shifted array gives R=D. Therefore R=C=D."
State and prove the Rearrangement Theorem for non-negative series.
Statement: If an≥0 for all n, then any rearrangement ∑n=0∞aσ(n) has the same sum as ∑n=0∞an.
Proof: Let σ:N∪{0}→N∪{0} be a bijection and define a double series by bσ(n),n=aσ(n) and bm,n=0 if m=σ(n).
In each row m, exactly one term is non-zero (since σ is bijective), and it equals am, so RowSumm=am and hence R=∑m=0∞am (original sum).
In each column n, the only non-zero term is bσ(n),n=aσ(n), so ColSumn=aσ(n) and hence C=∑n=0∞aσ(n) (rearranged sum). Since all bm,n≥0 , we can change the order of summation and get R=C. Therefore the rearranged series has the same sum as the original.
Proof of the nullity test for divergence?
Proof: Let sn=a1+⋯+an be the partial sums.
Suppose for contradiction that ∑n=1∞an is convergent, so sn→s for some real number s. Then also sn−1→s. By algebra of limits, sn−sn−1→s−s=0. But sn−sn−1=an, so an→0.
This contradicts the assumption that an→0. Therefore the series must be divergent.
Proof of the absolute convergence theorem
Statement: If \sum_{n=1}^\infty |a_n| < \infty, then:
1. there exist non-negative sequences pn,qn such that an=pn−qn for all n and both ∑n=1∞pn and ∑n=1∞qn converge;
2. the series ∑n=1∞an converges;
3. ∣∑n=1∞an∣≤∑n=1∞∣an∣.
Proof: Define pn=an+={an,0,amp;an≥0amp;anlt;0 and qn=an−={0,−an,amp;an≥0amp;anlt;0.
Then pn,qn≥0 and an=pn−qn,∣an∣=pn+qn,0≤pn,qn≤∣an∣.
Since ∑∣an∣ converges, the Comparison Test gives that ∑pn and ∑qn both converge, say to P and Q.
By Algebra of Infinite Sums, ∑an=∑(pn−qn) converges and has sum P−Q. Also, because 0≤P,Q≤∑∣an∣=:M, we have ∣P−Q∣≤M.
Therefore ∣∑n=1∞an∣=∣P−Q∣≤∑n=1∞∣an∣."
Proof of the alternating series test.
Statement: Let a1,a2,⋯≥0 be a decreasing sequence with an→0. Then the alternating series a1−a2+a3−a4+⋯=∑n=1∞(−1)n+1an is convergent.
Proof: Write the series as the sum of two series: Series 1: (a1−a2)+0+(a3−a4)+0+(a5−a6)+0+⋯ and Series 2: a2−a2+a4−a4+a6−a6+⋯.
For Series 1, the terms are non-negative because an is decreasing, so a1−a2≥0, a3−a4≥0,….
Its partial sums are bounded above by a1, since each step subtracts at least as much as the next addition gives back.
So by the Upper Bound Test, Series 1 converges.
For Series 2, the partial sums are a2,0,a4,0,a6,0,….
Each partial sum lies between 0 and an, and since an→0, the Sandwich Rule gives that these partial sums tend to 0.
So Series 2 converges.
The original alternating series is Series 1 plus Series 2, so by Algebra of Infinite Sums it is convergent."