1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Reservations
reservations to CPPCG don’t violate object and purpose
DRC v Rwanda
reservations to CPPCG don’t violate object and purpose + some ministers outside art 7 VCLT troika can bind state if special portfolio
Hungarian dams
VCLT Art 62 fundamental change in circumstances but didn’t show unforeseeable and radical transformation + illegally pulling out of a treaty tbd by treaty law but consequences by state responsibility
NSCS
CIL: widespread/representative particip w/specially affected states
ILC Conclu 10
Opinio juris: public statements, legal opinions, attitude in conferences etc
SS Lotus
PCIJ inferred custom from action and acquiescence
Nicaragua
deduced customary non intervention from sovereign equality + inconsistent CIL doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist + use of force both in UNC/CIL + US not responsible for all actions + only grave uses amount to armed attack
ICL Conclu 15
persistent objector CIL: formation, consistent, tell others (doesn’t apply to jus cogens)
Nicaragua vs ICTY vs Bosnia Genocide
effective ≠ overall control for state responsibility of non-state actors
Arrest Warrant
national judgements can matter for state practice
Chagos AO
self-determination is CIL + GA resolutions can reflect evolving CIL
OAU Resolution
uti possidetis
Kosovo AO
Declaration of indep didn’t violate IL + remedial secession + SC decisions interpreted in the light of treaty law for guidance only
Quebec secession
exceptional external self-deter doesn’t work when state complies with equal rights and self-deter (represents all people)
Reparations for injuries AO
UN has ILP so can bring case to ICJ
Certain expenses AO
organ can interpret constituent treaty
Namibia/Reparations AO
subsequent practice of IO can help to interpret treaty
Nottebohm
need genuine connection for nationality
ICL Art 4 (diplomatic protection)
birth, decent, naturalization ect in interna law and not inconsistent w IL
Gambia v Myanmar /East Timor
any state can invoke responsibility for erga omnes
Monetary gold
can’t decide w/o 3rd party
Nuclear Weapons AO
must have competence to ask ICJ opinion
Tehran hostages
translated into acts of that state
Lagrand
Us had to prove cessation/won’t happen again after state responsibility
UNSC Res 1368 2249
Right to self-defense against non-state actors
Article 2 Drat ARticles on the Responsibility of IO for Internationally wrongful acts
an IO is orga established by treaty/instrument governed by IL posessing ILP
Eastern Carelia
an ICJ request can’t circumvent a bilateral dispute