1/63
exam revision
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Virtue ethics
Based on inner character rather than external action
four key life skills (virtues)
Socrates and Pluto: Courage, moderation, justice and wisdom
what is the good life according to virtue ethics?
One where the person has developed life skills
3 ways to develop virtues
1 - nature
2 = reason
3 = habit
Aristotles belief
virtues are a skill for acting well
Aristotle on the good life
virtues are necessary but not sufficient to lead a good life, humans need some external goods.
human connection to plants
plants (vegetative capacity) = respiration and photosynthesis . if this isnt fulfilled we will die
human connection to animals
Food survival and intercourse
how are humans different from plants and animals?
We require reflection and we have conscious thoughts , bringing reason into our lives.
The Stoics model on virtue
virtues are sufficient enough; external goods arenât necessary to the good life
Hedonism
The idea that pleasure is the best thing and the goal of life
Callicles
suggested the best life is one where the most powerful people stay in positions of dominance by satisfying their desires without restraint.
How does Socrates criticise Callicle?
Socrates believes the wise person doesnât need more for their own benefit.
The leaky jar
The itch
The leaky jar
Someone who lived as Calliclesâ advises would constantly have new desires. So they would live a life where they were frenetically trying to get what they wanted and would never be satisfied. That doesn't sound like a good life.
The itch
Imagine someone who got a lot of pleasure from scratching an itch. If they constantly scratched at it, they would continue to fulfill their pleasurable desires, but they wouldn't live a very good life. So the good life cannot just be a pleasurable life.
What is pleasure according to Socrates then?
Remedial. (a bandaid for an open wound)
Epicureans
Form of hedonism, however they believed Callicles view misunderstood the implications of hedonism
What did the epicureans believe
stable pleasure, absense of pain and anxiety is the true basis of happiness
short vs long term pleasure
what causes most short term pleasure doesnât cause most pleasure in the long term (drinking alcohol, partying ect.)
Philiosophy for Epicureans and Stoics
Aimed at fulfilment
interested in virtues
Aims to avoid psychological suffering
what is the cradle argument
the epicurus (Callicles) concept that all pleasure is by nature familiar to us
how does epicurus slightly differ to Callicle?
Believed different forms of pleasure are better than others.
Peace of mind (ataraxia)
a stable condition of wellbeing in the body and the sure hope of its continuance.
3 kinds of pleasures according to Epicureans
Natural and necessary (food, drink, sleep) easy to acquireÂ
Natural but unnecessary (sex, fine food, fine drink) harder to secureÂ
Unnatural and unnecessary (luxury, fame, power) harder and more shameful to secure.Â
The law of moses
âDivine Command Theoryâ aka, âvolunteerismâ
An action is right because God prescribes it. Not that God prescribes an action because it is right.
The Gospels as Philosophical SourceÂ
Not a system or formulaÂ
Jesus criticises people's attempts to find a formula or a shortcut for understanding his teachings.
Key ethicals of the Beautitudes (Sermon on the mount)
Praises hardship and endurance in return for a pleasurable ascend to heaven
Paul, the Apostle: Romans 2-8: Righteousness and the LawÂ
No one can humanly attain righteousness before the Law of Moses because it states one must have no inclination to disobey the law (No murder, no adultery)
Paul, the Apostle: Romans 2-8: Righteousness and Faith
Because humans cannot achieve the law of moses, they must demonstrate their salvation through faith in Christ, whose moral perfection is revealed not in judging others but in forgiving them, making righteousness attainable through grace rather than legal merit.
Corinthians 13: Paul of Love (agape) (Charity) as the highest Good.Â
Love is the Good that gives eloquence, prophecy, wisdom and generosity their value as goods.Â
St. Augustine of Hippo: Christian virtues: ignorance, sin and the willÂ
Christian scholasticismÂ
Use the tools of greek philosophy to better understand and explain christian doctrineÂ
The four cardinal values (Plato and Aristotle)
WisdomÂ
CourageÂ
Temperance/self restraint
Justice/moralityÂ
Now regarded as the four human virtuesÂ
+ 3 divine virtues âfaith, hope and loveâÂ
Augustines belief
argues that weakness of will is real because people can know what is right and freely choose not to do it, making sin a deliberate rejection of God's will rather than mere ignorance.
Aquinas on Virtue and Natural Law
teaches that human flourishing consists in freely loving God through faith, hope, and charity, while Natural Law allows all rational beings to use reason to discern and pursue the good that God has built into creation.
difference between ancient and modern ethics
ancient = focus how to live
modern = focus how to act
3 forms of modern ethics
Deontological
Utilitarianism
Modern virtue ethics
Deontological ethics
âstudy of dutyâ
morally right act = conforms to the morally appropriate rule
two forms of deontological ethics
Kantianism (Immanuel Kant) : act according to the law a rational agent would prescribe
Intuitionism : act in line with our intuitive duties
Utilitarianism
the right action is the one that produces the most happiness
Modern virtue ethics
choose the action that a virtuous agent would choose or one that accords with rules developed from the virtues
kants categorical imperative
act according to maxims that could be universe laws.
Intuitionism
with reflection on clear moral convictions we can discern what our fundamental duties are
utilitarianism
We are to act in the way that will produce the greatest overall amount of happiness in the worldÂ
arguments against utilitarianism
justice - Utilitarianism requires that we treat someone unfairly. Therefore, Utilitarianism cannot be right.
Rights - In Utilitarianism, an individualâs rights may always be trampled upon if enough people benefit from the trampling.
Disruption of personal relationships - We are told to treat everyone equally under Utilitarianism however, this is absurd when considering the concept of caring as deeply for a random stranger than one's own child.Â
two forms of utilitarianism
Quantitative (simple) utilitarianismÂ
All pleasures are equal (Jeremy Bentham)
Argued there was no qualitative difference between forms of pleasure assuming they were as intense and lasted as long.Â
Qualitative (perfectionist) utilitarianismÂ
Some pleasures are more valuable than others (J.S Mill)
Reading an informative book = higher pleasure than drinking a glass of wine.Â
act vs rule utilitarianism
Act utilitarianismÂ
Choose the act which will produce the greatest overall utility (Bentham)Â
Evaluate acts in terms of how much pleasure we think will be producedÂ
Rule utilitarianismÂ
Follow the rule that has been shown to produce the greatest overall utility (Mill)Â
It can be too rigid: Following some rules may mean we can't produce the greatest amount of happiness.Â
care ethics