1/57
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Amygdala
Affective brain region: memory and emotion
Striatum
Affective brain region: reward based and addictive
Insula
Analytic brain region: regulating emotions
ACC
Analytic brain region: resolving conflicts of interest
Frontal Cortex
Analytic brain region: maintenance and goal management
fMRI
brain scan observing changing oxygen levels in the brain
PET scan
Inject radioactive fluid into blood and observe brain function
EEG
measures electrical brain activity
Lesion study
Remove brain section and observe changes, operate on animals or use natural examples after accidents on humans
Pareto criterion
Welfare planners use the pareto efficient allocation
Voting Criterion
Social planners allow people to vote, assuming they correctly identify their preferred option
Utilitarian criterion
Choose the stream that maxes the sum of all utilities in the economy
Completeness
Given two lotteries you either prefer one or the other
Transitivity
If L1 > L2 and L2 > L3 then we can infer L2>L3
Risk Averse
Prefers L > (E[L},100%), occurs when utility is concave
Risk Seeking
Prefers L < (E[L},100%), occurs when utility is convex
Risk neutral
Prefers L = (E[L},100%), occurs when utility is linear
Propsect Theory EQ
V(L) = π(L(X1))*v(X1)+…+π(L(Xn))*v(Xn)
Value function
An interpretation function of a reward in a lottery It is reference dependent and loss averse. It is risk-seeking in losses and risk-averse in gains.
Probability weighting function
An interpretation of probabilities of events. Over-weights small % and under-weights large %
Narrow bracketing
Decisions are taken in isolation, or given a small sample set
Broad bracketing
Decisions are made depending on other decisions
Disposition effect
Investors hold on to losing stocks too long and sell winning stocks too fast
Endowment effect
WTA>WTP because of reference point
Ellsberg Paradox
Additivity is violated across beliefs
Conjunction fallacy
The belief of A and B happening should not be greater than the individual belief of A or B.
Law of small numbers
Extreme events appear much more likely in small sample sizes
Gamblers Fallacy
An event occurring multiple times makes beliefs over the event happening again smaller
Hot Hand Fallacy
An event occurring multiple times makes beliefs over the event happening again larger
Sure thing Principle
Basically additive beliefs
Present focused reversal
If an agent is more likely to make an action in the present than if all options were delayed by an equal amount of time
Time consistency
If a decision is always made regardless of when actions are taken
Naïve planner
Believes they have EDU, no present bias
Sophisticated planner
Knows they have QHDU
Partially naïve planner
Knows they will have QHDU but overestimates their commitment to decisions
Commitment
The most an agent is willing to pay to force themselves to complete an action in a time period
Inequality Adverse
Prefers equal outcomes
Competitive perferences
Prefers to win or not lose
Reciprocal preferences
Likes to mirror how they were treated
Welfare Hedonism
Wellbeing consists solely in the presence of pleasure and the absence of painP
Preference theory
Wellbeing consists of having preferences satisfied
Objective theories
Wellbeing is a matter of having goods and enjoying them
Standard Welfare Anlaysis
Our choices reflect our preferences, assuming they are coherent and stable
Behavioural Welfare
Preference maximisation may not explain all choices
The Happiness Function
Wit = a + BXit + uit
Easterlin Paradox
Higher incomes mean higher happiness at a point in time, but over time increasing income does not result in higher happiness
Coherence
Are beliefs transitive?
Bernheim and Rangele approach
Choices can be unambiguously preferred, but mistakes are made when frame alters decision making. These mistakes can be ignored
Framing
Context changes decision making process
Mental Accounting
Using certain mental accounts to make managaing finances easier: Consumption, Investment and Money
Net experienced utility (Hedonic benefits)
The utility from consumption minus the disutility of the cost
Net experienced payment (Hedonic costs)
The disutility from the cost minus the actual cost
Nudge
An aspect of choice architecture that alters behaviour in a predictable way
Loss aversion
Losses loom larger than gains
Regulatory Focus Theory
How people react to frames depends on their motivational orientation
Sunk cost fallacy
Failure to acknowledge inability to recover fixed costs, which affects decision making
Opportunity cost
The value of the next best foregone alternative