Russia-Ukraine War and International Security Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/49

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering core concepts, security theories, and strategic terminology related to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Last updated 4:23 PM on 5/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

50 Terms

1
New cards

War

Reciprocal organized violence between adversaries trying to settle a political dispute, distinguished from crime or one-sided coercion by being official, political, and mutual.

2
New cards

War as a social phenomenon

A “full-spectrum” concept meaning war reaches beyond the battlefield into politics, economics, society, logistics, industry, information, and mobilization.

3
New cards

Shape-shifting war

The concept that war changes form across time and context, with “new” forms appearing as older forms disappear.

4
New cards

Total war

Conflict in which states mobilize vast resources, prioritize war over other state functions, and make the conflict a whole-of-society effort.

5
New cards

Comprehensive conflict

Karlin’s term for a current era where warfare spans multiple domains including nuclear signaling, autonomous systems, commercial space, industrial production, alliance politics, and state-society mobilization.

6
New cards

Attrition warfare

A strategy of exhausting the enemy’s personnel, equipment, and will over time instead of seeking a fast decisive victory.

7
New cards

Positional warfare

A war characterized by entrenched fronts, artillery, fortifications, and limited maneuver.

8
New cards

Hybrid war

A blend of conventional force with deniable or nonconventional methods such as disinformation, proxies, sabotage, and cyber activity.

9
New cards

Gray zone

The ambiguous space between peace and open war where coercion, proxies, cyber operations, and disinformation operate below the level of direct interstate war.

10
New cards

Proxy war

A conflict in which major powers fight indirectly through another state or group rather than through direct battlefield engagement.

11
New cards

Avatar warfare

An expansive version of proxy war where a state provides enough intelligence, logistics, targeting, and equipment that the proxy resembles a scaled version of the sponsor’s own warfighting system.

12
New cards

Deterrence

The attempt to prevent an adversary from acting by convincing it that the costs or risks of that action would be too high.

13
New cards

Escalation management

The effort to keep a conflict from widening in scope, intensity, or participants, such as preventing direct NATO-Russia war or nuclear use.

14
New cards

Escalation control

A synonym for escalation management emphasizing the ad hoc limits, informal ground rules, and flexible practices that emerge around a war.

15
New cards

Discursive signaling

Communicating resolve, restraint, or warning through speeches, public statements, communiqués, interviews, and other similar messages.

16
New cards

Salami slicing

Incremental policy change, taking one small step at a time, so that thresholds are crossed gradually rather than all at once.

17
New cards

Deconfliction

The maintenance of communication channels and practical separation between forces to reduce the chance of accidental direct conflict.

18
New cards

Nuclear coercion

The use of explicit or implicit nuclear threats to shape an adversary’s choices in conventional war or diplomacy.

19
New cards

Stability-instability paradox

The idea that stable nuclear deterrence at the strategic level can make lower-level conventional conflict more likely because actors believe nuclear escalation will be avoided.

20
New cards

Threat that leaves something to chance

Schelling’s concept that nuclear threats work by creating uncertainty about whether a catastrophe might occur, pressuring opponents to act cautiously.

21
New cards

Personalist dictatorship

A political system where one leader dominates decision-making and institutional feedback is distorted or suppressed, as seen in Putin’s Russia.

22
New cards

Regime security

The effort by an authoritarian regime to protect itself from internal threats, such as democracy contagion and domestic political mobilization.

23
New cards

Democracy contagion

The fear that a successful democratic neighbor will inspire domestic opposition or undermine authoritarian legitimacy at home.

24
New cards

Imperial ambitions

A leader’s or regime’s desire to restore lost territorial control, revive a sphere of influence, or reassert civilizational hierarchy.

25
New cards

Status, standing, honor

Lebow’s key motives for war initiation referring to the social and psychological drive to be recognized, respected, or avenged.

26
New cards

Realism

A family of theories emphasizing systemic constraints, power, and the balance of power as the primary drivers of state behavior.

27
New cards

Structural realism

A version of realism focusing on the structure of the international system, specifically anarchy and relative power, rather than domestic politics or psychology.

28
New cards

Classical realism

A realist perspective that gives significant weight to prestige, honor, fear, and human nature in explaining state behavior.

29
New cards

Balance of power

The distribution of military and political capability among states.

30
New cards

Security architecture

The regional framework that manages security among states whose security interests are tightly connected.

31
New cards

Unstable balance model

Ditrych and Laryš’s baseline scenario where conflict remains stalemated, deterrence is precarious, and the European security order is unsettled.

32
New cards

Positive stable balance

A security order stabilized by the degradation of Russia's military capacity, Ukrainian advances, a weakening Russian economy, and sustained Western support.

33
New cards

Negative stable balance

A stabilized order in which Russia retains revisionist power and the resulting order is stable on Moscow’s terms rather than liberal or European terms.

34
New cards

Concert model

A security order based on informal cooperation among major powers, confidentiality, and shared management of stability.

35
New cards

Article 5-like guarantee

A pledge to treat an attack on Ukraine as an attack on the guarantor, similar to the collective defense principle of NATO's Article 5.

36
New cards

Credibility

The degree to which an adversary believes a promise or threat will actually be carried out.

37
New cards

Burden-sharing

The distribution of defense efforts, spending, and military support among members of an alliance.

38
New cards

Collective defense

The principle that alliance members will defend one another against external attack.

39
New cards

Capability coalitions

Topic-based coalitions coordinated for specific military tasks such as artillery, drones, air force, or electronic warfare.

40
New cards

Danish model

A model in which states directly finance Ukrainian defense production rather than only donating weapons from their own stockpiles.

41
New cards

Defense industrial base

The network of infrastructure, firms, and factories that produce weapons and sustain military operations.

42
New cards

Long-range deterrence

Preventing enemy aggression by threatening targets deep in the rear, logistics, or regeneration capacity.

43
New cards

UAS or UAVs

Uncrewed aerial systems or vehicles, commonly referred to as drones.

44
New cards

Counter-drone technology

Technology designed to detect, disrupt, or destroy enemy uncrewed aerial systems.

45
New cards

Air and missile defense

Systems used to intercept aircraft, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and drones.

46
New cards

Strategic ambiguity

Uncertainty regarding commitments, thresholds, or intentions which can either stabilize a crisis or increase the risk of miscalculation.

47
New cards

Nuclear brinkmanship

The use of nuclear threats to push a crisis to the brink to gain leverage.

48
New cards

Normalization of war over sovereignty

The risk that war becomes viewed as an acceptable method for seizing territory, eroding the norm that state sovereignty is inviolable.

49
New cards

Deep, intermediate, and proximate causes

The three layers of explanation in the Götz and Ekman framework: long-run strategic conditions, developments in the years prior to war, and immediate decision processes.

50
New cards

Burden-sharing divide

A division within NATO between more threatened eastern and northern members and lower-contributing western and southern members.