1/6
Techniques for studying the brain, Neuroplasticity
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
About the study Draganski
Demonstrates how repeated action can lead to the growth of neural networks, and then stop of that activity can lead to neural pruning
Aim Draganski
See if learning a new skill (juggling) would affect the brain of participants
Participants Draganski
24 volunteers age 20-24 - 21 females and 3 males (majority females)
All participants were non jugglers
Each had an MRI scan at the beginning
Procedurę Draganski
Allocated to one of 2 conditions (jugglers or non-jugglers)
Juggling condition - 3 ball routine learn → asked to practice once mastered notify researchers
2nd MRI scan → after asked not to juggle anymore
3 months later another MRI scan → used to analyse VBM grey matter density
Non-jugglers control group
Findings Draganski
1 scan found no regional differences
2 scan found significantly larger amount of grey matter in the mid-temporal area (visual memory associated)
3 months later grey matter amount decreased - neural pruning
→ appears that juggling relies on visual memory rather than procedural memory which would change the cerebellum area
Strengths - Draganski
Used pre-test, post-test design to see the change over time
Causes and effect relationship can be established
Control group → reduced external variables
Limitations - Draganski
Small sample size - mainly females could not be generalisable
Field experiment (IV manipulated under natural conditions) → extraneous variables may affect results