1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
THE REPLICATION CRISIS
High profile cases of scientific misconduct
Further investigation revealed results of many studies difficult to replicate/reproduce
Reproducibility is a key part of the scientific method
WHY DID THE REPLICATION CRISIS OCCUR?
'publish or perish' culture
Psychology journals prioritised novel, counterintuitive research findings
Only positive findings published
RESPONDING TO REPLICATION CRISIS
Top social psychology papers rarely accept single-study papers
Top social psychology journals now encourage preregistration of hypothesis, methods and analyses
Top social psychology journals now encourage data and materials to be openly shared/accessible
It is becoming more acceptable for journals to publish 'replication studies'
Multi-lab replications increasingly common
ESTABLISHED EFFECTS CAN BE QUALIFIED
Just because an effect does not replicate when tested again, this does not mean it is not real
Even established effects may not emerge every single time
Effects naturally vary due to
Individual differences
Contextual differences
Cultural differences
GENERALISABILITY
Research disproportionately conducted on W.E.I.R.D samples
Western, educated, industrialised, rich, democratic
Up to 80% of participants in published literature
Around 12% of world's population
Lack of inclusivity and comprehensiveness even within WEIRD societies
White, majority, WEIRD, people are considered the default/norm
Most researchers are predominately WEIRD too
Assumed to be most capable of neutrality and objectivity