1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
For
“Knowledge is always is”
-Plato says that world is always changing, so truth is always changing.
-only way to attain true knowledge is in the unchanging; the forms
Meno argument
we recognise imperfectly equal sticks as “nearly equal”
must already have concept of equality to make that judgement
pre-knowledge points to Forms existing independent of experience
Augustine argument
Forms exists as “ideas in mind of God”
theological grounding & shows lasting influence
R.M Hare
moral language only makes sense if moral concepts like “goodness” are objective
supports Form of Good existing independently
G.M.A Grube
universal concepts like justice and beauty are meaningless without forms
Forms explain how we communicate with abstractions
Mathematic argument (republic)
Numbers and geometry behave like Forms
perfect circle doesn’t exist in physical world, yet mathematicians reason about it w/ certainty
If maths works, Forms work
Phaedo argument
souls ability to recognize Forms before birth
Forms exist independent of sense experience
Don’t learn forms, we recollect it
Simile of Sun
sun is to eye as Forms is to mind
makes all knowledge possible and nothing would exist without it
“Form of the good is cause of knowledge and truth
Iris Murdoch
"The Good has nothing to do with purpose... it is the magnetic centre"
defended by Murdoch in 1970 shows it withstands modern scrutiny
Peter Geach
abstract objects like numbers, propositions and moral values must have something non-physical to them
Against
Aristotle’s Third-Man Argument
if horses resemble Form of the Horse, you need a third thing to explain what makes them both similar
leading to infinite regress
Aristotle Seperation argument
form of horse that exists outside of actual horses is useless
Wittgenstein "Family Resembelance”
things called by same name (e.g. games) do not have one shared perfect essence
undermines whole basis for thinking a Form must exist to explain every concept
Aristotle “Doubling of the World” argument
Plato made a whole new world of “Forms” to explain our current physical world
World of Forms need just as much explaining
Russel
ultimately rests on unverifiable assumptions
no empirical foundation on existence of Forms
A.J Ayer (empricist)
any claim about a non-physical realm is meaningless under verification principle
can never be observed or tested