(3) Prejudice and reducing prejudice

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/40

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:09 PM on 5/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

41 Terms

1
New cards

What are the three main perspectives on human social cognition and behaviour?

Interpersonal processes, group processes, and intergroup processes

2
New cards

What are interpersonal processes?

The relationships between a small number of individuals such as friends, family members, and romantic partners

3
New cards

What are group processes?

The relationships and influence processes among members within a group

4
New cards

What are intergroup processes?

Relationships between groups, including prejudice, discrimination, and perception of people based on group membership

5
New cards

What is intergroup bias?

A systematic tendency to evaluate one’s own group or its members more favourably than an outgroup (Hewstone, Rubin & Willis, 2002)

6
New cards

What are the three components of intergroup bias?

Attitudes (prejudice), cognitions (stereotyping), and behaviours (discrimination)

7
New cards

What is prejudice?

A negative attitude or feeling towards members of a specific social outgroup; an affective response rather than a set of beliefs

8
New cards

How does Abrams (2010) define prejudice?

A bias that devalues people because of their perceived membership of a social group

9
New cards

What are stereotypes?

Beliefs about common characteristics assigned to members of a social group; often inaccurate and function as mental shortcuts

10
New cards

What is discrimination?

Negative behaviour directed towards members of social outgroups

11
New cards

Can someone be prejudiced without discriminating?

Yes, it is possible to hold prejudiced attitudes without displaying discriminatory behaviour

12
New cards

What did Abrams, Swift & Houston (2018) find about prejudice in Britain?

42% of respondents reported experiencing some form of prejudice in the previous year in a sample of 3000 participants

13
New cards

What reasons for prejudice were identified by Abrams, Swift & Houston (2018)?

Age, sex, physical or mental health, race, religion, and sexual orientation

14
New cards

What patterns of age and sex prejudice were found in Abrams et al. (2018)?

26% reported age prejudice, especially younger people; 22% reported sex prejudice, with higher reports among women

15
New cards

What are the main types of prejudice expression?

Direct and explicit prejudice, and indirect or subtle prejudice

16
New cards

What are indirect forms of prejudice?

Objections to equal rights and patronising or benevolent stereotypes about groups

17
New cards

What is old-fashioned or explicit prejudice?

Blatant expression of negative attitudes and stereotypes based on group membership

18
New cards

How have social norms affected explicit prejudice?

Overt expressions have become less socially acceptable due to changing norms and the Equality Act 2010

19
New cards

What did Charlesworth & Banaji (2019) find about prejudice over time?

Explicit attitudes became less extreme and moved towards neutrality across 4.4 million tests over 13 years

20
New cards

What was examined by Ruisch & Ferguson (2022)?

The relationship between populist leaders and expressions of prejudice

  • Supporters of populist leaders held more prejudiced views, but causality could not be established

<p>The relationship between populist leaders and expressions of prejudice</p><ul><li><p>Supporters of populist leaders held more prejudiced views, but causality could not be established</p></li></ul><p></p>
21
New cards

What is modern or implicit prejudice?

Subtle and covert forms of prejudice that are often unconscious

22
New cards

What is modern racism according to McConahay (1986)?

The belief that discrimination is no longer an issue, minorities demand too much, and their gains are undeserved

23
New cards

What is affirmative action and why is it controversial?

Policies aimed at improving opportunities for minorities and women, often opposed due to implicit prejudice

24
New cards

What is aversive racism?

A conflict between explicit endorsement of equality and unconscious negative stereotypes, leading to subtle discrimination

  • they experience negative emotions about a group but don’t express these attitudes

25
New cards

When does aversive racism become apparent?

In situations with unclear social norms, where unconscious biases can influence behaviour

26
New cards

What is benevolent sexism?

Subjectively positive attitudes that portray women as inferior and in need of protection

27
New cards

What are the three components of benevolent sexism?

Paternalism (women are less powerful than men), gender differentiation (exagerated differences between men and women), and heterosexual intimacy (women are beauty objects)

28
New cards

What is the stereotype content model (Fiske, 2012)?

A model proposing warmth and competence as two key dimensions in social perception

29
New cards

How do warmth and competence influence behaviour towards groups?

They affect whether groups are helped, ignored, or targeted negatively

<p>They affect whether groups are helped, ignored, or targeted negatively</p>
30
New cards

How is prejudice measured using explicit measures?

Self-report questionnaires such as feeling thermometers that are conscious and prone to social desirability bias

31
New cards

What are implicit measures of prejudice?

Measures of automatic evaluations, often assessed using reaction times such as the Implicit Association Test

32
New cards

What is the Implicit Association Test (IAT)?

A reaction time task measuring strength of association between groups and evaluations

33
New cards

What did Greenwald et al. (2009) conclude about the IAT?

The IAT does not predict behaviour better than explicit measures and assesses hidden bias rather than prejudice itself

34
New cards

How does social learning theory (Bandura, 1977) explain prejudice

Children learn their attitudes by direct training or by observing and imitating their parents behaviour (in theory children should show no prejudice at an early age)

Limitations:

  • Mixed findings regarding correlation between children and parents attitudes

  • Empirical work does not always support the expected trajectory

35
New cards

How does Cognitive-developmental theory  - Aboud 1990 explain prejudice

  • Prejudice is caused by information processing errors due to young childrens poor cognitive ability

  • Cognitively immature young children are prone to prejudice because they cannot process multiple classifications

    • Not necessarily negative

    • Peak in prejudice around 7-8 years, consistent with cognitive development stage

36
New cards

How does Authoritarian personality - Adorno et al 1950 explain prejudice

Trait and behavioural style for conventionality and respect to submission - more conventional views

  • Difficult upbringing leads to an authoritarian personality

  • Peterson et al., 2016 - authoritarian consistently negatively correlated with authoritarian personality to big 5 openness's

 

Limitations:

  • Widespread ethnic cleansing (not everyone who did this did these tradigeis)

  • Prejudice changes: both point to the importance of cultural influences over personality

37
New cards

How does Social dominance theory (Pratto, Sidanius & Levin, 2006) explain prejudice

All societies are made up of groups with relevant hierarchies - some people belive their groups is the correct one

  • Power relationships between groups are maintained through discrimination

38
New cards

How does Intergroup emotions theory (Mackie, Devos & Smith, 2000) explain prejudice

  • Looks at the appraisal on emotions -if it is relevant to use it elicits an emotional response

  • We react emotionally when an outgroup might threaten an ingroup - cognitive appraisal that this could threaten us, leading to anger and aggression

39
New cards

how does the intergroup contact approach work for adults

Bringing together members of different group should reduce prejudice under the right conditions (Allport, 1954)

  • Friendship is an effective form of contact - extended contact can reduce prejudice

  • Contact has a stronger effect of affect (feelings) than cognitions (stereotypes)

  • Limitations:

  • Intergroup anxiety arises - if they have high levels of this they will have low contact and therefore assume they are dissimilar  - leading to prejudice

40
New cards

Why are childhood socialisation approaches to prejudice reduction limited?

assume childhood prejudice results from exposure and that teaching positive attitudes will reduce prejudice

often reduce prejudice initially-effects fade over time because children are not empty vessels and their cognitive, emotional, and social development increasingly shapes how they interpret group norms and identities

41
New cards

How does Nesdale et al. (2003) support this view of prejudice reduction?

showed that as children grow older, prejudice becomes increasingly influenced by ingroup norms and group identification rather than simple exposure, demonstrating that developmental changes mean early exposure-based interventions may not produce lasting reductions in prejudice