1/74
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Photosynthesis
chemical reactions that turn sunlight energy into glucose (sugar) and other small biological molecules; the energy can then be used internally for synthesis/building
sunlight + carbon dioxide (CO2) + water (H2O) → glucose (C6H12O6) + oxygen (O2)
Positive feedback
amplifies the initial response *try not to say increase; keeps a system/process going; can destabilize a system; ex. Climate change/global warming, Blood clotting
Negative feedback
working opposite of the stimulus (negative = opposite) *don’t focus on speed; the mechanism to maintain homeostasis; (helps stabilize a system; very common in regulatory systems); ex. regulating body temp.
Quantified observations
Data; observations that were turned into explicit counts or measures
Null hypothesis
the hypothesis that any differences are due to random differences from drawing two samples from the same population; what many statistical tests start with
The hypothesis that says there is no relationship between the IV and DV.
It is deemed valid until proven untrue by statistical experiment — By testing your (alternative) hypothesis through an experiment, you are trying to disprove/reject the null hypothesis. (Similar to ‘innocent until proven guilty;’ null hypothesis = status quo, alternative hypothesis = change/innovation)
Allele frequency
proportion of each allele in the gene pool; decimal
Genetic drift
“random changes in allele frequencies from one generation to the next;” “may cause large change in small populations;” *not mutation* — strictly environmental events pg. 305
Founder effect
the resulting change in genetic variation when a few individuals (who likely don’t have all the alleles in the gene pool of its source population b/c it’s such a small group) colonize a new region; (some individuals get separated from their original population and form a new small population in a different place and as this founder population grows, there is less variation b/c it started from a few individuals with only a few alleles from the gene pool) the change is equivalent to if a large population got reduced by a bottleneck
Similarities and difference between founder effect and bottleneck
Similarities:
population goes large→small→large
forms of genetic drift
reduce genetic variation
Difference: Original population
Founder effect- original population still exists, just in a different location (so the original genetic variation is only lost in the new population)
Bottleneck- original population is gone (so the original genetic variation is lost completely)
Intrasexual selection
when certain features improve “the ability of their bearers to compete for access to mates” Pg. 306
Intersexual selection
when certain features make “their bearers more attractive to members of the opposite sex” Pg. 306
Checkpoint question: How do self-fertilization and sexual selection differ in their expected effects on genotype and allele frequencies over time?
Self-fertilization will not affect genotype or allele frequencies over time while sexual selection will. Self-fertilization will result in more homozygous and less heterozygous genotypes, while sexual reproduction will result in more heterozygous and less homozygous genotypes.
If the offspring are equally able to survive from nonrandom mating (sexual selection) or random mating, it will not change allele frequencies.
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
“a model in which allele frequencies do not change across generations and genotype frequencies can be predicted from allele frequencies” pg. 308
5 principles of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
[only apply to sexually reproducing organisms]
There is no mutation.
There is no natural selection (selection among genotypes).
There is no gene flow.
Population size is infinite.
Mating is random.
Results/consequences if these conditions hold:
Allele frequencies remain constant
Genotype AA, Aa, aa
Frequency p^2, 2pq, q^2