1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
ad hominem
attacking the person making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself
straw man
misrepresenting or exaggerating someone’s position to make it easier to attack
slippery slope
claiming that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of extreme consequences without evidence
hasty generalization
drawing a broad conclusion from too small or unrepresentative a sample
false dilemma/false dichotomy
presenting only two options when more exist, forcing a choice between extremes
red herring
introducing an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original issue
appeal to authority
claiming something is true because an authority figure says something
appeal to emotion
manipulating emotions instead of using logical evidence
bandwagon/appeal to popularity
arguing that something must be true or good because many people believe/do it
post hoc ergo propter hoc
assuming that because one thing followed another, the first caused the second
begging the question
assuming the conclusion in the premise instead of proving it
tu quoque
dismissing criticism by pointing out the opponent’s hypocrisy instead of addressing the argument
equivocation
using a word or phrase with multiple meanings to misleading
no true scotsman
redefining a group to exclude counterexamples after a generalization is challenged
appeal to ignorance
claiming something is true because it hasn’t been proven false (or vice versa)