1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
induction
bacon’s method: particular instances → general principles
easily proven wrong (any contradiction), but only way that interacts w/ the world to find new info
house of salomon
fictional research institution and utopian brotherhood from bacon’s new atlantis
collective research society, everyone had their own role
designed to study/experiment/invent for benefit of humanity
the royal society
founded 1660
emphasized baconian experimentalism + empiricism
model for the state to avoid civil wars, opposite of dogmatism, accepted diverse ppl/views
did NOT like math/rationalism/dogmatism/certainty
the invisible college
royal society started as unorganized, informal philosophical gathering
purpose was to study nature but also escape from violence/intolerance to safe haven
became a cause to show how ppl w/ different beliefs can work together wo fighting
show that seeking common ground + working together benefits everyone
certain ppl added for social legitimacy + royal support
robert boyle
prominent member of royal society, explained composition of air w/ air pump + gas laws
wrote abt mechanical philosophy (god started motion but things move according to their own laws)
systematic experiments but still avoided certainty (anti-dogmatic RS)
thomas hobbes
political philosopher/mathematician/rationalist, founded his philosophy on euclidean geometry (no dissent/leviathan state)
criticized royal society for uncertainty of their results + for allowing dissent (will lead to chaos)
fellows hate hobbes’s approach as intellectual dead end in science + dangerous approach to state
fought w/ leaders of royal society, esp john wallise + robert boyle
never elected as royal society fellow despite reputation as mathematician/natural philosopher
micrographia
1665, written by robert hooke (RS), detailed observations w/ microscope
“letter on light and colors”
sent by newton to RS in 1672
theory of light + color (light made of a certain few colors)
cannot split colors by running thru prism again– each color is pure
RS impressed by his experimentation but didn’t like his certainty, wanted to avoid dogmatism even w/ comprehensive evidence
“I think, therefore I am”
cartesian doubt— reason thru everything to find truth
cannot doubt one’s existence while thinking/doubting, so one must exist
la geometrie
descartes’ world is mathematical/geometrical
book (1637) develops a mathematics to describe such a world
every geometric figure in the world can be described thru an algebraic equation
analytic geometry: defined by relative positions, not axes
isaac beeckman
introduced descartes to atomism and “physico-mathematical” approach to science
liked his hypotheses abt particles + mvmts but felt it was too indeterminate (no proof), wanted absolute certainty
discourse on the method
1637, detailed descartes’ method of finding truth thru systematic doubt
divide into as many parts as possible, simple → complex, only accept what there is evidence for
clear and distinct ideas (descartes)
foundation of all certain knowledge
clear: any idea that is immediately present and fully manifest to a focused mind
distinct: completely separated from all other ideas without any ambiguity
any idea both clear + distinct is definitely true (guaranteed by god)
extension (descartes)
the fundamental property of physical matter to occupy, or exist in, physical space
matter = extension in space
no other qualities (color, heat, etc)
res extensa: extended substance (physical body/world), takes up space but cannot think
res cogitans: thinking substance (mind/soul), thinks but takes up no physical space
vortices (descartes)
bc all space is matter, motion cannot leave behind empty space
space vacated by matter is simultaneously filled w/ matter
consequently natural motion in the world is a vortex
planets carried around in vortex around the sun, all other stars also centers of similar vortices
Uraniborg and Stjerneborg
revolutionary, custom-built astronomical observatories built by tycho brahe (1570s) on his gifted island; above + below ground
predated telescopes, so contained giant, complicated instruments
collected measurements w/ large team of assistants
nova of 1572
according to aristotelianism, novas were considered atmospheric phenomena
tycho measures “new star’s” parallax + finds none against background stars
therefore must be further than moon, in the heavens— heavens do change after all
comet of 1577
also seen as atmospheric phenomena in aristotelianism
tycho finds 0 parallax against background stars again— comets move thru heavens, past moon
shatters crystalline spheres idea of heavens, planets float in empty space
discoveries grant him reputation + island gift from king of denmark
parallax
apparent shift in an object’s position when viewed from two different lines of sight (depth perception)
moon has parallax bc relatively close to earth, anything beyond that (heavens) has none
ex supernovas, comets, planets, etc
mysterium cosmographicum
kepler, 1597— believed he’d discovered the most fundamental geometric framework that god used to create the world
five platonic solids– 3d symmetrical objects w/ identical symmetrical sides
place one inside the other, draw circles around each– planetary orbits fit in the circles
cute model but ultimately wrong, eventually discovered that orbits were ellipses, not circles
astronomia nova
kepler, 1609; included mars’ orbit + his first two laws of planetary motion
first law: shape of orbit of all planets is an ellipse, w/ sun as one of its foci
goes against established tradition of perfectly circular orbits, but fits w/ kepler’s belief that god created world according to geometrical pattern
second law: areas swept by a planet in a given time are always the same regardless of its speed
3rd law published 1619: harmonicus mundi (musical harmonies of the heavens)
third law: ratio between the square of the period of a planet and its average distance cubed is constant bw all planets
Kepler’s areas law
an imaginary line connecting a planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal intervals of time
sun’s power greater the closer the planets are, planets move faster the closer they are to the sun
orbit of mars (kepler)
took him 8 yrs to calculate bc was still trying to adhere to circular standard but actually ellipse
based on tycho’s v accurate data + followed his strict margin of error
law of falling bodies (galileo)
in vacuum, all objects dropped form same height will fall at same constant acceleration, regardless of mass/shape/weight
gravity causes falling at constantly increasing speed, not steady speed based on weight (aristotle)
doctrine of the two books (Galileo)
galileo’s argument that religion + science were compatible
god’s word contained in both Book of Nature + Book of Scripture— cannot contradict each other
if appear to conflict, precedence given to nature bc she doesn’t lie
bible simplifies things for human understanding + not meant to convey scientific info
cardinal bellarmine
1542-1621
1615 letter says that motion of earth contradicts bible
copernicanism acceptable as hypothesis, not truth
willing to concede that interpretation of scripture might change, but only catholic church has authority to decide that (counter-reformational principle)
1616: sent galileo formal summons to deliver warning abt heliocentric model
sidereus nuncius
galileo, 1610
announced his telescopic discoveries
moon’s surface
medicean stars
four largest and brightest moons of Jupiter (io, europa, ganymede, callisto)
discovered by galileo in 1610, named in honor of his patron, cosimo II de medici, grand duke of tuscany
mountains of the moon (galileo)
published sketches in sidereus
disproved aristotelian notion that heavenly bodies were perfectly smooth + fundamentally un-earth-like
if moon has geography like earth, earth is more likely to be another planet moving thru space
“[The Universe] is written in the language of mathematics”
1623 treatise Il Saggiatore
book of nature cannot be understood unless one first learns its language: triangles, circles, and geometry
reliably describe, model, predict the behavior of the cosmos w/ math
the council of trent
1545-1563, council held by catholic church in response to protestant reformation
counter-reformation: church reemphasizes its role as conduit of divine grace + source of religious authority
insists its teachings are superior + true, desseminate thru jesuits
salviati
galileo’s mouthpiece in dialogue on the two chief world systems, 1632
conversation on ptolemaic + copernican system bw three friends
salviati, simplicio (ptolemaic/aristotelian system, simpleton), sagredo (wise arbitrator)
book is clear advocacy of copernicanism– salviati (+ sometimes sagredo) scores all convincing points
urban VIII
galileo dedicated assayer (book on atomism), 1623 to pope urban viii
believed w/ friendly pope could go back to copernicanism
initially galileo’s patron, permitted him to write abt heliocentrism as mathematical hypothesis
turned against him after galileo seemingly mocked him in his dialogue (simplicio)
“annus mirabilis” (newton)
1665-6 (plague year), newton achieved most of his most important discoveries
method of fluxions + fluents (calculus), composition of light, centripetal force formula (mv2/r), inverse square law
inverse square law
gravitational force between any two objects is directly proportional to the product of their masses + inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them
principia mathematica
1687, very impressive + comprehensive scientific work
covers wide range of phenomena (trajectory of projectiles, motions of comets, etc)
all derived from a small number of assumptions precisely + mathematically
done mostly thru experiments + mathematics
“de Motu”
sent halley de motu corporum in gyrum, 1684
shows that inverse square law of attraction results in ellipse (elliptical orbits also prove the law)
path would be some conic section (parabola, hyperbola), becomes ellipse below a certain speed
then derives kepler’s three laws from the inverse square law
newton’s second law of motion
acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass
explains how much force is required to change the speed or direction of an object— F = Ma
absolute space
an infinite, immovable, and unchanging void that exists independently of any physical objects
served as stationary reference frame for the universe
prior to matter + independent of it, pervaded by force of gravity
universal gravitation
every body in the universe attracts every other body in direct proportion to their mass + inverse proportion to the square of their distance
key assumption in principia, explains terrestrial gravity + planetary motion