socioling mt

pinker 2007

real language is pushed/pulled by speakers

labov 2006

knowledge of community is essential to understanding of linguistic behavior

hudson 1996a

linguistic items words syntax phonemes

horvath 1998

sociolinguists should pick/choose from sociology

hymes 1974

sociolinguists should identify specific points of intersection

milroy 2004

agrees sociolinguists should identify specific points of intersection

trudgill 1978

mechanism of language change and variability rounds out linguistic theory

hudson 1996b

variety is a set of linguistic items in similar distribution

ferguson 1972

variety is a body of patterns sufficiently homogeneous

haugen 1996a

language and dialect are ambiguous terms

gumperz 1982

historical and political factors affect variety classification

kremer 1999

young nederlanders are more aware and proud of standard dutch

milroy 2001

standard language is inherited from losers like shakespeare

fairclough 2001

standardization leads to nationhood which is the preferred state under capitalism

haugen 1966b

dialects may become languages through codification and elaboration

mathiot/garvin 1985

standardization unifies a community

petyt 1980

koine is speech shared by people of different vernaculars

hudson 1996c

dialect is what you are, register is what you are doing

cameron 1995

verbal hygiene consists of cleaning up or standardizing a language

labov 1972

speech community participates in a shared set of norms and value judgements

eckert 1998

communities of practice are people who share an endeavor

bloomfield 1983

speech community interacts via speech

gumperz 1971

speech community communicates regularly using a set of verbal norms

hymes 1974

speech communities are defined by how they differentiate themselves

morgan 2001

speech communities are aware of norms and when they are being violated

rosen 1980, coupland 2007

cities are not patchwork maps and blur the geographic assignment of speech communities

fishman 1972

language usage varies by domain and topic, hypothetical government functionary in belgium

horvath 1994

social networks are not a useful framework for analyzing rural speech communities

milroy 2003

social networks and communities of practice are the same concept with different focuses and methods

platt 1975

speech repertoire belongs to the community, verbal repertoire belongs to the individual

coates 2004

dialectology marginalizes women speakers

labov 2005

regional dialects are getting stronger and structural divisions more sharp

hudson 1996d

isoglosses need not delineate language varieties

hudson 1996e

agrees that data pooling based on discrete factors loses important information to be drawn from individual data

petyt 1980b

data pooling based on discrete factors loses important information to be drawn from individual data

milroy 2003

failure to achieve statistical significance does not constitute sociolinguistic irrelevance

coupland 2007

“late-modernity” has further blurred the lines of socio-economic class

bailey/bickerton

indivuals controls isolects, between which there is an implicational relationship + all variation is a result of change in progress