1/144
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
1841-1935
Laws are rules enforced by courts
Single authority can lead to tyranny
Courts should rule predictably on cases
William Blackstone
1723-1780
Rule of civil conduct prescribed by supreme power commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong
Thomas Hobbes
1588-1679
Mankind sacrificed all rights to the state to protect property and lives
Negative view on human nature
Montesquieu
1689-1755
Checks and balances
Separation of powers
Power should be limited (no absolute power)
John Locke
1631-1704
Law should extend freedoms
Social contract
EX: law against spitting gum increases rights because others won’t get gum on their shoes
Big influence on founding father
Who influenced the Constitution the most?
Montesquieu and John Locke
Ethics
Goals that the law should strike to emulate
George Bernard Shaw
People don’t take the time/effort to reason their own morals and ethics
We take historical artifacts and adapt them
Civil Disobedience
Knowingly breaking the law to make a statement
Who has done civil disobedience?
Henry David Thoreau, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr
Brown v. Board of Education
Supreme court ruled that 3 school board’s segregation were unconstitutional
Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson
Roe v. Wade
Constitutional right to privacy guaranteed woman’s right to abortion
Before: 18 states
During: 32 states
What case overturned Roe v. Wade?
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org
Ethics and Law
People’s view on ethics changes the law more
What are the purposes of law?
Deal making
Compromises
Order, stability, justice, fairness, equality
Influences conduct
Code of Hammurabi
1750 BC
Babylonian Empire
Reciprocal law principle
lex talionis
give to ruler by sun god Shamash: very inflexible
Lex talionis
“eye for eye”
Code of Solon
600 BC
Greek empire
laws are product of human reason
rule of the people (democracy)
adapted old systems
Code of Justinian
533 A.D
Roman empire (large)
systematized civil law system
big influence but not in US
lex civilis
civil law system
Code of Napoleon
1804 A.D
French revolution
depends a lot on legislature to write laws into code
Louisiana (codes not common law)
Common law
english speaking countries
History of common law
Battle of Hastings in 1066: Normans attacked and william the conqueror became king
law yearbooks: records + precedents
state decisis
What is state decisis?
Idea of following law already decided (precedents)
provides stability and structure for judges
lawyers argue against by stating facts (situation) of specific case are different than precedent
Decision is binding in court if it or higher made it
Books that helped law progress
Commentaries on Laws of England (1769) by William Blackstone
Last great law reference text America took from Britain
The Common Law by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr
Precedents
Past court cases that are binding
Crime
Offense against society at large
Tort
Offense against private person or business
Victim can bring tort claim but can’t commence criminal proceedings
Can only be liable
Felony
A year or more
Can strip civil rights but can petition
Misdemeanor
Less than a year
Offense
Administratively handled wrongs
No jail time
Treason
Betraying one’s country
Capital Crimes
Punishable by death
Murder, treason, epionage
Larceny
Non-violent theft
Robbery
Violent theft
Supreme Court
Highest and court of last appeal
How many federal circuit courts of appeal?
12
How many district courts?
94
Hierarchy of courts
Supreme court (all bound)
Circuit courts of appeals (all district courts in circuit bond)
district courts (that district bond)
Steps to courts
1) File case w/ district court in your jurisdiction
2) If lose, file with circuit
3) If lose, file petition for writ of certiorari w/ supreme court
Examples of stare decisis being overcome (case that overturned previous cases)
Brown v. Board of Education
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org
Hope v. Pelzer (2002)
Hope v. Pelzer
It is cruel and unusual punishment to tie a person to a hitching post in the hot sun with no bathroom breaks
How courts get around stare decisis
Distinguish the facts
Claim previous precedent was mere dicta
Mere dicta
Extra, non-crucial portion of opinion
Not legally binding
State laws
Not binding to another
Dyods
Groupings of 2
Substantive law
creates, defines, and regulates law, legal rights, and litigation
ex: law against murder (criminal) and tort law (civil)
Procedural law
rules and laws used to enforce substantive laws
trial lawyers, litigators, and admin lawyers hired
establishes methods a person may obtain remedy in court
private law
between individual and/or business
lawsuits, contract, property, agency, partnerships
public law
between person and government
tax, constitutional, criminal, admin
criminal law
wrongs against society
civil law
wrongs between individuals (wronged and aggressor)
case law
based on preceding court cases and decisions
common law
some based on statues (interpretive in annotated statutes)
statutory law
based on statutes from legislature
codes are type of statues
ucc
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
Most important business law statute
Comparative law
Study of differences/similarities in legal systems of multiple countries
International law
Rules, principles, and norms that govern relationships among nations
Legal citation
1) Parties names: plaintiff v. defendant
2) Volume
3) Reporter (publication)
4) Page number
5) Date: Year
Unitary gov
one sovereignty
most countries
Federalism gov
dual sovereignty between federal gov and states
about 30 countries
best
confederacy gov
states have more power than national gov
very few countries
US gov
civil war established US as federalism
trend toward federalism
European union
lower taxes internationally
Jurisdiction
power and authority to speak the law
US has 51 (one for each state and federal)
state sovereignty
Can’t enter treaties, declare law contradictory to US law, or make their own money
increase in federal law (ex: labor laws)
Jurisprudence
Theory and philosophy of law
Not mutually exclusive
Historical school of Jurisprudence
law should be interpreted and applied by analyzing historical origins
law is always evolving
Friedrich Karl von Savigny
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr
Emphasis on experience
Utilitarianism
Achieve the greatest good for the greatest number
Maximize gains for society
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
George Bernard Shaw
Objective even if they are ones losing
Law and economics (“Chicago School”)
Must understand market behavior
Popular among political conservations
Richard Posner
Gary Becker
Robert Bork
Positivism
Laws put forth by state or governing authority are valid and should be enforced
If positivist disagrees, may work to change it but will abide until changed
John Austin
H.L.A. Hart
Natural law
Law comes from values that are morally right and wrong
Strive for ideal state of being
Ethics!!
Egalitarianism
William Lloyd Garrison
Immanuel Kant
John Rawls
Egalitarianism
Equality
William Lloyd Garrison
The Liberator
Against constitution bc of slavery
Immanuel Kant
Deontological
Categorical imperative
Deontological
Duty-based, think of means and ends
Categorical imperative
Behavior driven by duty and not consequences
Teleological
Behavior driven by consequences
John Rawls
1921-2002
A Theory of Justice
Theories about justice are too connected with the perceptions of our places in society
Make laws from POV of someone who knows nothing about their natural abilities or place in society
You have to remove the Veil of Ignorance
Lon Fuller vs. H.L.A. Hart
Debate about Natural law (Fuller) vs. legal positivism (Hart)
Legal realism
need to account for how people really behave to understand the law
need to know person making decision (lawyer, judge)
Benjamin Cardozo
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr
Roscoe Pound
Karl Llewellyn
Ex: disregarding a shocking remark in court but the jury still heard it and can’t just forget it
Cultivation theory
Viewer’s perception of reality altered based on the shows they have watched
CSI Effect
jurors in criminal cases expect definitive, conclusive evidence against the defendant as seen on CSI
The thing (assembly)
Scandinavian Viking legislative body assembled to speak the law and resolve disputes
Primary predecessors to jury system but was preferable if the assembly already had background knowledge
Civil law
Code-based law
Europe, Quebec, LATAM, Louisiana
Judges don’t make laws they just apply it (FIND FACTS)
Inquisitor: establishes facts and is judge
Inquisitorial
Common law
Based on court decisions and precedents
English-speaking countries (America)
Parties usually find facts
Judges establish what law is NOT FACTS
Finding truth asymptotically: Lawyers present sides
Adversarial
Pro-se
Person defending themselves
Inquisitorial
Judges play larger role (find facts)
Huissiers: legally trained, court-appointed to find facts
Richterliche
Judges have durty to provide help and feedback to parties
Adversarial
Facts will emerge when 2 opposing sides present cases in court
Lawyers develop facts, not judges
Bad: side with better lawyers can win
Service of process
The due process clause of 14th amendment
Prohibits legal action against person who doesn’t have notice of claim against them
Defendant must be notified that lawsuit filed by proper summons (Rule 4)
Complaint and summons
How to obtain complaint and summons
Via certified mail
Sheriff serves
Private process server
Summons
Notifies party that they are being sued/charged and timeframe
Worse than subpoena
Subpoena
Compels someone to testify under oath or provide documents
Subpoena duces tecum: bring specified docs
Waiving service of process
Avoids embarrassment of being served in public place
Given more time to respond (20-30 days to 60 days)
Penalize for avoiding service
By Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Plaintiff can send notice of commencement of action
Will request to waive SOP
Allows judge to require party who refused to waive SOP to pay for cost of serving process
Motions to dismiss (demurrers)
Even if the plaintiff was true, still doesn’t have case
“so what?”
Demurrers - without prejudice
Refile case with revised pleadings
Innocent mistake
Demurrers - with prejudice
Final
Improper motive
Demurrers - if statue of limitations applies
More harmful to plaintiff
Past the timeframe given to refile
Answer
When motion is denied or not moved to dismiss
Denies/admits claims in complaint
Affirmative defenses
Counterclaims