Attachment - Exam questions

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcard use only

Last updated 8:20 AM on 4/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

8 Terms

1
New cards

Discuss Bowlby’s idea of the internal working model (8 marks)

AO1

  • Internal working model - cognitive framework formed that influences the way in which we understand relationships, thus forming the foundation for all future relationships

  • Formation of IWM based on relationship with primary caregiver

AO3

  • (+): Strong scientific research support: Harlow (1958) - study on monkeys who were raised without a proper attachment showed social and emotional difficulties - abused and killed children, and bullied by other monkeys

  • (+): Strong scientific research support: Bailey et al. (2007) - 99 mothers and their 1 year old infants. Those with poor attachments to their mothers likely to have insecurely attached infants

  • (-): Deterministic

2
New cards

Discuss Bowlby’s idea of the critical period (8 marks)

AO1

  • Critical period - Period of time in which attachments need to be made or else the child will find it difficult or impossible to form future attachments

  • If attachment isn’t formed, can lead to long-term social, emotional and intellectual deficits

  • 2.5 years for humans

AO3

  • (+): Backed by scientific research: Lorenz (1930s) - study on geese which found that geese have critical period of 16 hours (-): animal study

  • (+): Genie case study - deprived until the age of 13 and suffered from cognitive deficits

  • (-): Czech twins - isolated from 18 months to 7 years by their abusive mother, later adopted and made a full recovery - Critical period later replaced by 5 year sensitive period

3
New cards

Outline Lorenz’s and Harlow’s animal studies of attachment. Discuss what these studies might tell us about human attachment (16 marks)

P1 - AO1

  • Outline Lorenz’s procedure

  • Outline Harlow’s procedure

P2 - AO3 (Lorenz’s results and links to attachment)

  • Imprinting - attachment is innate

  • 16 hours to imprint - critical period

P3 - AO3 (Harlow’s results and links to attachment)

  • 1 hour with wire, 17 hours with cloth - attachment favours comfort

  • Behaviour from fear conditions (secure base) - attachment figures promote curiosity and explorative behaviour

  • Behaviour with infants and other monkeys - IWM

P4 - AO3 (EV for both Lorenz and Harlow)

  • Animal studies - not generalisable but may be as monkeys and humans are both mammals

  • Harlow’s study is quite artificial so low ecological validity

4
New cards

One theory about how and why babies form attachments is Bowlby’s monotropic theory. Outline and evaluate Bowlby’s montropic theory of attachment (8 marks)

AO1

  • Monotropic theory - infants form one special primary attachment that is more important for emotional and psychological development. Usually the mother

  • Forms IWM

  • Babies’ use of social releasers to attract carer-reciprocity

  • Critical period

AO3

  • (+): Strong research support: Harlow and Lorenz

  • (-): Implications such as the role of the father - maternity vs paternity leave = wage gap

  • (-): Contradictiry research- Schaffer and Emerson (1964): Glasgow babies study, 60 babies observed monthly for 18months. Found that at around 10-11 months, infants begin to from multiple attachments and seek comfort and protection in them. As well as showing separation anxiety from multiple people

5
New cards

Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (8 marks)

AO1

  • Maternal deprivation - loss of maternal element of care

  • Leads to inevitable and irreversible psychological damage

  • Delinquency, cognitive deficits, affectionless psychopathy, Inability to form future relationships

AO3

  • (+): Evidence from external research - Genie case study: deprived up the age of around 13 years old. Could understand and pick up basic language and use non-verbal communication, but had trouble with speaking grammatically (pronouns and umbrella terms) and move effectively

  • (+): Backed by scientific research - 44 thieves study: 14 affectionless psychopaths, 30 non-psychopaths. 85% of AP were deprived. 15% of N-AP were deprived

  • (-): Contradictory research - Czech twins study: twins deprived form 18 months to 7 years old. Later adopted and made a full recovery

6
New cards

Discuss learning theory as an explanation of attachment (16 marks)

AO1

  • Learning theory: attachments are formed due to the infant associating its primary caregiver with food - classical conditioning

  • Attachment is built upon and maintained through operant conditioning

  • Define operant conditioning and how negative reinforcement and positive reinforcement are both used in the formation of attachments

AO3

  • (-): Contradictory scientific research - Harlow’s (1958) - study on monkeys and found that comfort was favoured over food (wire and cloth mothers) (secure base behavaiour) (1hour vs 17hours)

  • (-): Contradictory scientific research - Schaffer and Emmerson (1964) - Glasgow babies study: observed once a month for 18 months and found that the infant’s primary attachment wasn’t the one who fed them in around half the cases

  • (-): Reductionist - the focus on basic processes like reinforcement is too simplistic to explain complex attachment behaviours

7
New cards
term image
8
New cards

Discuss the Strange Situation as a way of assessing attachment type (16 marks)

AO1

  • Used to determine and asses the nature of the attachment between caregivers and their infants by testing different aspects of attachment such as secure base, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, and reunion

  • 0Done through putting the infant through 8 ‘episodes’ in a controlled environment

  • Outline the 8 episodes

  • Came to the agreement of 3 main attachment types: secure, insecure avoidant, and insecure ambivalent

AO3

  • (+): Strong scientific research support - Bick et al (2012): found that observers agreed on infants’s attachment type 94% of the time

  • (-): Cultural bias - designed and tested in the USA. Van Ijzendoorm and Kroonberg found that % are different in other countries e.g.German children frequently rated as insecure avoidant due to parents valuing independence.

  • (+): Real-world application as it is highly replicable - standardised procedure, high level of control, carried out successfully in many different cultures