Lecture 7 - Bias and Confounding

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:02 PM on 5/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

35 Terms

1
New cards

What is bias?

Systematic error meaning multiple replications of the same study would reach the wrong answer on average 

2
New cards

What does bias cause in epidemiological studies?

Lack of internal validity or incorrect assessment of the association between an exposure and the effect in target population  

3
New cards

What is internal validity?

Extent to which the findings can be used in the assessment of the association between an exposure and the effect in target population  

4
New cards

What is external validity?

Extent to which the findings can be used in generalisation between populations.

5
New cards

What is ‘Positive results’ bias?

Tendency to post or publish positive results rather than negative or inconclusive results.

6
New cards

What is ‘Hot Stuff’ bias?

Tendency to post and give attention to new, trending fields or topics. 

7
New cards

What is selection bias?

Arises from procedures used to select study subjects and from factors which affect study participation 

  • Results in relation between exposure and disease being different for those who participate in the study and those eligible for inclusion

8
New cards

Types of selection bias include…

  • Inappropriate definition of eligible population  

  • Lack of accuracy of sampling frame 

    • E.g. non-random sampling 

  • Uneven diagnoses in target population  

  • Bias during study implementation  

    • E.g. losses to follow-up, non-response  

9
New cards

How can selection bias be minimised?

Choose study population with extreme care 

  • Should represent target population  

Maximise take-up and follow-up among those invited to participate 

If possible, compare characteristics of study population with those of persons who did not respond or withdrew

10
New cards

What is information bias?

Arises during data collection

  • Variables are inaccurately measured, recorded or classified

  • Focus on misclassification bias

    • Bias in classifying exposure or outcome

11
New cards

What is observer bias?

Interviewers' knowledge may influence the structure of questions and the manner of presentation which may influence responses  

  • Researcher’s expectations, opinions and interpretation impact on the results

12
New cards

What is recall bias?

Those with a particular outcome or exposure may remember events more clearly  

  • May also amplify their recollections 

13
New cards

What is reporting bias?

Participants might give answers they perceive to be of interest to the investigators 

14
New cards

What is Hawthorne effect?

People act differently if they know they are being watched  

15
New cards

What is detection bias?

If greater effort is given to diagnosing disease in an exposed group than in an unexposed group  

16
New cards

What is Protopathic bias?

Exposure is influenced by early (subclinical) stages of disease 

  • E.g. drug is prescribed for early stage of disease that has not yet been diagnosed  

17
New cards

How can protopathic bias be minimised?

Either:

  • Calculate two odds ratios. One including cases who were prescribed the drug in response to early symptoms AND one excluding this group

  • Apply a lag-time into the exposure definition. Any exposures which occur during the lag time will be ignored.

<p>Either:</p><ul><li><p>Calculate two odds ratios. One including cases who were prescribed the drug in response to early symptoms AND one excluding this group</p></li><li><p>Apply a lag-time into the exposure definition. Any exposures which occur during the lag time will be ignored. </p></li></ul><p></p>
18
New cards

What can be done to minimise information bias?

  • Blinding 

  • Use standardised definitions of disease and exposure  

  • Use standardised data collection instruments and ensure training and quality control 

  • Maximise response to questionnaires  

  • Validate information using independent sources  

19
New cards

What is ‘mistaken identity’ bias?

  • In some trials strategies meant to alter patient behaviour may instead alter clinician behaviour 

20
New cards

What is cognitive dissonance bias?

  • Belief in a given mechanism may increase rather than decrease in face of contradictory evidence 

21
New cards

What is significance bias?

  • Statistical vs clinical significance 

22
New cards

How can analysis bias be dealt with?

  • State hypothesis to be tested in advance 

  • Follow analysis plan 

23
New cards

How can interpretation bias be dealt with?

  • Treat all interpretations with caution  

  • Look for evidence from systematic reviews  

24
New cards

What is confounding?

‘A confusion of effects’ 

  • The effect of an external factor is mistaken for or mixed with the effect of the exposure under investigation  

    • Such a factor is called a confounding factor 

25
New cards

What are examples of confounding factors?

  • Number of storks nesting and numbers of babies born at around the same time 

    • Seasonality  

  • Low birth weight and father’s smoking 

    • Mother’s smoking 

  • Children sleeping with light on and myopia in later life 

    • Children who read a lot 

26
New cards

What is a confounding factor?

  • A is the exposure of interest and B is the disease or outcome being studied  

  • C is an extraneous factor which confounds the relationship between A and B 

    • C is a confounder which causes A and B 

    • Can create a distorted association between A and B

27
New cards

What is Simpson’s paradox?

  • Correlation present within different groups may disappear or even be reversed when the groups are combined

    • Titanic survivors

      • Among males and females, the crew had a higher survival rate than 3rd class passengers

      • However, because female survival rate was higher than males and because most the crew was male, the differences between crew and 3rd class passengers disappears when male and female data is combined

<ul><li><p><span style="line-height: 20.85px;">Correlation present within different groups may disappear or even be reversed when the groups are combined</span></p><ul><li><p>Titanic survivors </p><ul><li><p>Among males and females, the crew had a higher survival rate than 3rd class passengers </p></li><li><p>However, because female survival rate was higher than males and because most the crew was male, the differences between crew and 3rd class passengers disappears when male and female data is combined</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
28
New cards

How can confounding be controlled for in the study design?

  • Restriction  

    • E.g. exclude smokers 

  • Matching 

    • Select persons to minimise correlations with confounders

    • Match controls and cases

  • Randomisation 

29
New cards

How can confounding be controlled for in analysis?

  • Stratification 

    • Make comparisons within specific levels of confounders  

      • E.g. gender, age group  

  • Standardisation  

30
New cards

Why can adjusting for confounding when its not present be bad?

Example:

  • Both risk factor A and disease B are related to C but A and B are NOT related  

    • C is called a collider  

    • E.g. genetic factor (A) and diabetes (B) may be unrelated but both may be related to heart disease (C) 

    • Adjusting for C would induce a spurious correlation between A and B 

<p>Example:</p><ul><li><p><span style="line-height: 20.85px;">Both risk factor A and disease B are related to C but A and B are NOT related&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><ul><li><p><span style="line-height: 20.85px;">C is called a collider&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p></li><li><p><span style="line-height: 20.85px;">E.g. genetic factor (A) and diabetes (B) may be unrelated but both may be related to heart disease (C)&nbsp;</span></p></li><li><p><span style="line-height: 20.85px;">Adjusting for C would induce a spurious correlation between A and B&nbsp;</span></p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
31
New cards

What is a collider when dealing with confounding?

A risk factor (C) which is related to exposure and outcome (A and B) BUT the exposure and outcome (A and B) are not related to one another.

  • A and B are both associated with C

<p>A risk factor (C) which is related to exposure and outcome (A and B) BUT the exposure and outcome (A and B) are not related to one another.</p><ul><li><p>A and B are both associated with C</p></li></ul><p></p>
32
New cards

What are intermediate variables?

If factor A affects the risk of disease C solely by modifying another factor B.

  • B is the intermediate variable

33
New cards

How can controlling for confounding mask relationships due to intermediate variables?

  • If factor A affects the risk of disease C solely by modifying another factor B, then adjusting for B would mask the relationship between A and C

    • E.g. if a factor increases the risk of heart disease by increasing blood pressure, then the impact would be obscured if you adjusted for blood pressure   

34
New cards

What is the low birth weight paradox?

  • Children of smoking mothers are more likely to be of low birth weight  

    • LBW children have higher infant mortality rate than others 

  • BUT

    • LBW children born to smoking mothers have a lower infant mortality rate than LBW children of non-smoking mothers  

35
New cards

What is the explanation of the low birth weight paradox?

  • Smoking is harmful in that it contributes to low birth weight which results in higher mortality than normal birth weight

  • HOWEVER

  • Other causes of low birth weight are generally more harmful than smoking resulting in increased mortality rate