1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Aims and Objectives
securing survival against Bolshevik expansion
preserve/enlarge the Aryan racial community
Autarky - foreign policy synonymous with a strong, independent, self-determined economy
More living space and more German speaking people in German occupied territory
Solve the problem of Hitler’s main antagonists
Britain
France
use of force to protect Germany’s flanks
War on a western front to protect Germany from Western influences
Overturn the Versailles Treaty
Redefine border with France
Destroy Communism
Hossbach Memorandum 1937
Severe tension between Hitler and Schacht over rearmament
Speech to generals trying to convince them to push forward with aggressive expansionism
Emphasising the need for Lebensraum
Outlining his plan to target Austria and Czechoslovakia for their resources
Received generally poorly - economy not sufficiently recovered from the Depression to garner much support
The memorandum was transcribed by Hossbach - not a direct recantation of Hitler’s speech but the paraphrasing of it
outlining the soviet union as an enemy
outlining timeline for Lebensraum to be completed by 1943-45
Stages before war
1933-36: aggressive feeling after the Treaty of Versailles
January 1934 - German non-aggression pact with Poland
Upset the French and signalled a move away from Russia
France try to get close to Russia as a consequence
July 1934 - Austrian Nazis assassinate Chancellor Dolfuss
Mussolini moves troops to the border to oppose however no other steps taken to prevent an Anschluss
Stresa Front 1935: allied pact broken 9 days later when Russia and France signed a treaty of mutual assistance
Anglo-German naval Pact 1935 - sanctioning a 3x growth in German navy
October 1935 - Mussolini invades Abyssinia causing disunity between Britain, France and Italy
Passivity from the West in reoccupying the Rhineland
Intentionalist Arguments
Hitler took clear decisive steps to European dominance and war
1925 Mein Kampf
Use of the language of conflict (sword, victory)
Called for the acquisition of more land at Russia’s expense
Zweites Buch
More foreign policy focused
1928
Outlining directly who were to be the enemies and allies
Secret Memorandum 1936
Justified a massive arms build up over the next 4 years
Prepare the country for war in 4 years
outlining Foreign policy aims of domination
Believed Germany was in a constant ideological struggle with the Soviet Union and it was fated to lead to war and victory
Trevor-Roper 1953
The Fuhrer had enough power to control events such that they led to war
Bullock 1968
The invasion of Austria was a clear example of Trevor-Roper’s argument
Functionalist Arguments
Aim to unite German speakers first
Did not wish to aggravate western territories originally
Germany still militarily and economically weak
Early aims - to only take the Sudetenland, Austria, Poland
Only continues to push through due to successes and passivity in the West
Taylor 1964
Hitler was a pragmatist who took advantage of chance situations
he exploited the western allies’ divide after Mussolini’s invasion of Abyssinia
Was only planning to invade Soviet Union if the smaller conflicts strengthened the Reich
Relying on current events rather than planning
Pushing war due to tensions in the economy - wished to mobilise before it got too bad
Joachim von Ribbentrop
Ambassador to the UK for Germany 1936-38
Navigated 1935 Anglo-German naval agreement
Particularly cautious over remilitarisation of the Rhineland
Reich minister for foreign affairs 1936-45
Executed in Nuremburg trials
Pact of Steel with Mussolini in 1939 - pact of friendship and non-aggression
Originally a Tripartite Pact but Japan pulled out until September 1940
Wanted to maintain good relations with the Soviet Union and was against Barbarossa
Molotov Ribbentrop Pact 1939
Mutual agreement to divide Poland East/West if Hitler invaded
Supported the involvement of Japan and USA in the war
Poor relations with the British foreign office
Misinformed Hitler that he had Edward VIII support
Hitler thought Britain wouldn’t declare war so felt safe in expansionism
Active forces encouraging Expansionism 1936
Rhineland
Anschluss
Czechoslovakia
Poland
Axis arrangement with Italy
Mutual self interest
did not intervene in Austria
Anti-Comintern Pact
Broadened Axis to include Japan
Fixing a Pacific front in the event of war
Actively seeking agreements with France’s potential ally, Russia
Appeasement sharpened the injustice felt during the Versailles treaty
People more willing to support Hitler’s argument
Germany’s bilateral agreements undermined the collective security of the League of Nations
Passive forces encouraging expansionism
Depression pushing USA towards isolationism
Ineffective controlling force
Treaty of Versailles too strict
Allies aware of this by 1936
Following a policy of appeasement to counteract it
allowed Germany free reign in other territory
Momentum
Every time Germany breaks a clause in the Treaty, that becomes a blueprint for the next action
League of Nations lacking power to intervene
British and French too economically weak to fight for Czechoslovakia
France isolated
Soviet Union isolated
Belief in the West that it was Eastern communism that was the threat
Involvement in the Spanish Civil War increased Western suspicion
West unable to secure a pact with USSR in 1930s
would have given Poland practical military protection
1939 - success in Western Europe
Invasion of Norway April 1940
Secured supply chain from Sweden
Iron Ore could pass through
Atlantic base
Denmark occupied April 1940
Little resistance → Britain and France too weak to resist
Belgium invaded in 18 days, Netherlands in 5
France falling in a month - May 1940
Defeatist attitude
Failure of the Maginot Line
Ineffective preparation
Vichey government - collaborationist
Empire that stretched from Oslo → Mediterranean
Success of Blitzkrieg
Surprise
Speed/aggression
Only a nominal force needs to be left in captured areas
Momentum - enemies fall faster
Dependent on speed
No delay or change in plan can be supported
Crucial mistakes
Delayed attacking Dunkirk - allowing 340,000 troops to be evacuated
Winston Churchill - determined not to surrender
Operation Sea Lion
Attacking radar installations/naval bases
RAF had time to rebuild aircraft/train new pilots
Suffered heavy losses/retreated
Blitzkrieg - 7 September
Fighter command could build up its force as there were few engagements: did it by night
1940-41
Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria - forced to become Nazi allies
Britain recalling their children by 1940
‘Phony war’ - affected morale as more were killed in the Blitz
Britain holds out long enough for the Americans to join the war
Pearl Harbour panics Hitler into Barbarossa
Operation Barbarossa
After failure in Britain
Hitler convinced it would be easy
Forced into action by non-Nazi government in Yugoslavia threatening oil supplies
June 1941 - suffering with oil supplies and desperately needing oil from the Caucuses
Influenced by Aryanism/Lebensraum
Political symbolism of Moscow - end goal
¾ of the German force set aside for the Scorched Earth invasion
Economic motivations most key
Reflected in decision to divert tanks to the South by September 1941
Siege of Leningrad kept troops stationary - ineffective tactic in relation to Blitzkrieg
Moscow not taken but tying up troops during the attempted encirclement
660,000 prisoners taken in Kiev
Intentionalist - plans to invade the Soviet Union
Mein Kampf mentions invasion
Lebensraum where communists are portrayed as fundamentally weak
Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure comes crashing down
Planned for a fast victory
6-8 weeks
shown through troop supply allocation
Eventually slowed by distance and winter
Why Barbarossa was initially so easy
Soviet armies badly led
Stalin’s purges of the Red Army still fresh
Fearful leadership
not allowed from using ‘traditionalist’ tactics
fear of retribution for failure
Christmas 1941 - 3 million Soviet soldiers captured
Failure of Barbarossa
Vastness/Rasputitsa - difficult to mobilise quickly
Number of Russian troops
weather
supply issues
ill-adapted
Hitler’s obsession with not being allowed to retreat or refocus
Failure to actually capture Moscow or Leningrad
‘Ivan factor’
Failure 20 miles out from Moscow
First Nazi defeat on land
events of the failure of Barbarossa
Pockets of resistance forming behind front lines due to overstretching
Attacked German rear and cutting them off from front lines
cannot resupply or get back in time
Hitler goes against his Blitzkrieg tactics
Turning army around to deal with pockets of resistance
Breaking momentum
against generals’ advice
Soviets can reform the defence line around Moscow
Supply
Britain and USA resupplying Soviet Union while Germany runs out of resources
Soviet relocation of factories to the Urals
increasing production quotas for T-34 tanks and planes
October
thaw and freezing cycle during the Autumn
mud
turns into a full blown Soviet winter
more soldiers in hospital with frostbite than on the front lines
Supply lines cut
Massive transfer of Soviet troops from the east
Mongolian, Siberian
Learnt covertly that Japan wouldn’t attack their Eastern border
Experienced, well trained
Equipped for winter
snow suits/ski battalions
winter weapons that wouldn’t lock up in the cold
Forcing Germany into a war of attrition that it couldn’t win
1942 - Stalingrad is attacked
direct orders from Hitler
Needing to take it as a point towards the Caucuses oilfield
Hitler loses faith in his generals → making worse and worse individual decisions
Stalin’s considerable talents in planning and organising plus ability to go back on his Purge ideologies contrasted Hitler
Capture of Sicily and capitulation of Italy July 1943 stretched Hitler’s theatre more
Withdrew troops from Orel to send to Italian Front - less manpower