move to global war paper 1

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:45 PM on 4/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

US responce to Japan Mostly Non-Impactful (1931–37)

  • Stimson Doctrine (1932)
    → US refused to recognize Manchukuo after the Mukden Incident
    →  No sanctions, no force → Japan ignored it

  • Herbert Hoover
    → Prioritized Great Depression → no intervention in Manchuria

  • Neutrality Acts
    → Banned arms sales/loans to war states → limited US help to China

 

2
New cards

US responce to Japan Increasingly Impactful (1938–41)

Increasingly Impactful (1938–41)

  • US-Japan Trade Treaty ended (1939)
    → Allowed sanctions legally

  • Oil embargo (1941)
    → US supplied ~80% of Japan’s oil → cut off completely
    → Japan faced collapse within ~2 years without oil

  • Asset freeze (1941)
    → Blocked Japanese access to US money/trade

3
New cards

Nazi soviet pact lead to outbreak of war

Nazi-Soviet Pact removed Hitler’s biggest risk

  • Signed 23 August 1939 between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin

  • Guaranteed no two-front war for Germany
    👉 Allowed Hitler to attack Poland safely

Eastern Europe divided into spheres of influence

  • Poland split between Germany & USSR

  • USSR gains Baltics + Finland influence
    👉 Shows war was pre-agreed, not accidental

Direct trigger of invasion

  • Germany invades Poland 1 September 1939

  • USSR invades from east 17 September 1939
    👉 Pact made joint destruction of Poland possible

4
New cards

Nazi soviet pact didn´t lead to outbreak of war

Long-term aggression by Adolf Hitler

  • Aims in Mein Kampf:
    → Lebensraum (eastward expansion)
    → Destruction of communism
    👉 War was already likely regardless of pact

Failure of Appeasement

  • Munich Agreement allowed takeover of Sudetenland

  • No resistance to earlier aggression
    👉 Encouraged Hitler to continue expansion

Weak collective security

  • League of Nations ineffective
    👉 Could not stop aggression (Manchuria, Abyssinia, etc.)

5
New cards

Germany and Italy's foreign policy up to 1940 influenced by territorial ambitions to a LARGE EXTENT

1. Nazi expansion for Lebensraum

  • Adolf Hitler aimed to expand east for Lebensraum

  • Actions:

    • Anschluss

    • Munich Agreement → Sudetenland

    • Invasion of Poland (1939)
      👉 Clear, consistent territorial expansion policy

2. Italian imperial expansion

  • Benito Mussolini wanted a “New Roman Empire”

  • Actions:

    • Invasion of Abyssinia (1935–36)

    • Occupation of Albania (1939)
      👉 Direct land acquisition = core aim

3.Opportunistic territorial gains during instability

  • Germany exploited weakness of others:

    • Remilitarization of Rhineland (1936)

    • Expansion during appeasement
      👉 Foreign policy consistently linked to gaining land

6
New cards

Germany and Italy's foreign policy up to 1940 influenced by territorial ambitions to a SMALL EXTENT

1. Ideology beyond territory

  • Hitler’s goals included:

    • Destroy communism

    • Racial reordering of Europe
      👉 Territory was a means, not the only aim

2. Prestige and domestic propaganda

  • Mussolini used foreign policy to boost popularity

  • Victories in Abyssinia increased support at home
    👉 Motivated by status and image, not just land

3. Strategic and defensive considerations

  • Nazi-Soviet Pact
    → Secured Germany against USSR (not territorial)

  • Italy often acted to maintain great power status
    👉 Some decisions about security and alliances, not expansion