1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Q1-multiple choice 5 mins (4marks)
Method
1.Box off section
2.Highlight the evidence in the extract
3.Select answer
Q2-analyse language 10 mins (8marks)
AO2-explain, analyse how writers use language to achieve effects and influence readers
Method
1.Box off section
2.highlight phrases with question in mind
3.try link evidence to find pattern. Find 2 themes / big ideas
4.annotate key quotations using subject terms + the effect on meaning
5.Plan paragraphs ; reader, connotations, mood...
Structure
P-point
Q-quotation
EAT-explore / analyse method / techniques
X2
Terminology
metaphor similie personification hyperbole
imagery allusion juxtaposition oxymoron
semantic field symbolism alliteration
Q3-Analyse structure 15 mins (8 marks)
AO2-explain, analyse how writers use structure to achieve effects
Method
1.Split text into beginning, middle, end
the breaks in text should occur when there is a shift
2.Annotate & highlight key quotations that evidence change
in; focus, pace, mood
3.Annotate any other structural features
4.Plan paragraphs ; explain structure, use quotations, consider effect
Structure
P-point
Q-quotation
EAT-explore / analyse method / techniques
R-readers response / writers intentions
X3
Terminology
Rising action Falling action Climax
cyclical structure foreshadowing zoom
flash forward flash back motif
Q4-Evaluate 30 mins (20 marks)
AO4-evaluate texts critically and support with appropriate textual references
Method
1.Read the statement and identify the opinions (usually 2)
2.Highlight key quotations that evidence whether you agree or disagree with the statement and annotate to identify method
3.Plan 3 paragraphs responding to both parts of the statement
Structure
P-point
Q1-quotation
EAT-explore / analyse method / techniques
Q2-quotation
EAT-explore / analyse method / techniques
C-conclusion
Sentence starters
I disagree with / dispute / contest the idea that...
The idea that ... is questionable / unconvincing / flawed
I agree that / concur that
It is evident that
It is rational to argue / reasonable to assume that