Nucleotide Excision Repair

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:32 PM on 4/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

What is NER?

Removal of damaged base(s) as part of an oligonucleotide fragment - bulky adduct repair

  • SSBR and DSBR are non-bulky lesion repairs

2
New cards

What are the two major UV photoproducts? Which protein complexes recognise both damages?

Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) - recognised by XPC

TC (6-4) photoproduct (6-4PP) - recognised by DDB (1/2 complex)

3
New cards

How does UvrA2B2 and UvrC act in NER?

UvrA2B2 moves along DNA - damage surveillance

Binds bulky lesions - UvrB (helices) deposited at damaged site, opens DNA forming ‘bubble’ structure

UvrC (nuclease) nicks lesion and induces polymerase and ligase to repair lesion

4
New cards

What are the predispositions associated with Xeroderma Pigmentosum?

rare inherited disease which predisoses patient to:

  • pigmented lesions on skin exposed to sun

  • elevated skin cancer incidence

XP genes can be caused by mutations in several NER related genes

5
New cards

describe the clinical symptoms of XP, TTD and CS

XP: skin sensitivity to sunlight, acute sunburn, pigment abnormalities, multiple cancer predisposition, some neurological and intellectual disabilities

TTD: sulfur deficient, brittle hair, no cancer predisposition

CS: dwarfism, loss of adopts tissue, sunken eyes, premature ageing, retinal atrophy, no cancer predisposiiton

Symptoms are spectral based on severity of disorder

6
New cards

How did granule analysis confirm XP as causative of NER defects?

non-XP cells released granules (new DNA strands) when treated with UV, XP cells did not

  • granules = NER occurance

XP can be categorised by UDS level (unscheduled DNA synthesis)

  • XP-A has lowest UDS

  • CS has regular UDS

  • XP-C is the most prevelant in UK - however XP prevalence overall is low, potentially due to lack of UV

7
New cards

How is Cockayne Syndrome detected, what mutations cause CS?

UDS in CS is same a normal patient - so not differentiative

however RNA synthesis is very low in CS - suggests defect in transcription?

  • CS defined by defective transcription coupled repair - all NER is global (up to 24hrs)

Mutation in CS-A or CS-B leads to CS - epistatic

<p>UDS in CS is same a normal patient - so not differentiative</p><p>however RNA synthesis is very low in CS - suggests defect in transcription?</p><ul><li><p>CS defined by defective transcription coupled repair - all NER is global (up to 24hrs)</p></li></ul><p>Mutation in CS-A or CS-B leads to CS - epistatic</p><p></p>
8
New cards

How does CS repair bulky lesions in comparison to WT?

WT cells repair lesions in transcribed strands - non-transcribed strand lesions do not affect protein-level

  • T4 denV endonuclease cuts DNA

TCR repairs DNA required for trasncription at a faster rate than GG-NER - crucial

CS cells are defective in all TCR, gene is effectively inactive until repaired by GG-NER

XP-C is opposite, only carry out TCR-NER, defective in GG-NER

<p>WT cells repair lesions in transcribed strands - non-transcribed strand lesions do not affect protein-level</p><ul><li><p>T4 denV endonuclease cuts DNA </p></li></ul><p>TCR repairs DNA required for trasncription at a faster rate than GG-NER - crucial</p><p>CS cells are defective in all TCR, gene is effectively inactive until repaired by GG-NER</p><p></p><p>XP-C is opposite, only carry out TCR-NER, defective in GG-NER</p>
9
New cards

How is a lesion recognised in GG-NER?

Detected by one damaged base in 1 million undamaged bases.

CPD and 6-4PP are recognised by DDB heterodimer (DDB1/2 - DDB2 is XP-E)

  • CPD is poorly recognised - better recognised by XP-C

DDB1 breaks helical structure of damaged site

DDB is part of a ubiquity ligase complex:

  • ubiqutinates chromatid proteins

  • recruits XP-C for CPD recognition

  • self ubiqutinates for self degradation

10
New cards

Describe the three significant subunits of the TFIIH complex and their importance in normal transcription and NER.

TFIIH is a basal transcription factor - subunits include XP-B, XP-D and TTD-A

Helicase in NER and normal transcription

  • XP-B: opens promoter sites via helices activity, not essential for NER but involved

  • XP-D: not essential for transcription, but essential for NER

  • TTD-A: not essential but involved in NER

XPB and XPD are helicases in opposing polarities

TFIIH forms ‘bubble’ structure in NER - defective TFIIH associated with TTD

11
New cards
<p>How does each X-ray crystallography mapping common mutations for each syndrome suggest differences in phenotype?</p>

How does each X-ray crystallography mapping common mutations for each syndrome suggest differences in phenotype?

XP mutations in ability to bind damage DNA suggest GG-NER defect

TTD mutations in core of protein suggest protein misfolding and TRANSCRIPTIONAL defect

XP-CS mutations appear to be a combination - defects in both?

12
New cards

What is the role of XP-A in NER? Is it an essential gene?

XP-A is a zinc finger protein which binds to UV-irradiated DNA, homologous to Rad14 in yeast

  • binding increased by RPA

verifies damage and postioning in NER - previously thought to recognise damage

  • XPA/XPC KO cells sensitive to UV, gene is important but not essential

13
New cards

Which nucleases are involved in NER? Are they essential genes?

XPG nuclease cuts from 3’ to damage, ERCC1 and XPF cuts from 5’ to damage

  • These genes are essential in KO mice, implies another crucial function

14
New cards

How was the sequential protein activation in NER determined?

UV-irradiate cell fluorescence analysis

<p>UV-irradiate cell fluorescence analysis </p>
15
New cards

What is the difference in TCR, compared to GG-NER?

Recognition proteins and mechanism different

Blocked RNAPII signals lesion recognition for TC-NER

recruitment of remodellers by CS-A/B proteins enable RNAPII to be pushed back and NER proteins can recruit to and bind damage.

further process is same as GG-NER

<p>Recognition proteins and mechanism different </p><p>Blocked RNAPII signals lesion recognition for TC-NER</p><p>recruitment of remodellers by CS-A/B proteins enable RNAPII to be pushed back and NER proteins can recruit to and bind damage. </p><p></p><p>further process is same as GG-NER</p>