1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Surface-level diversity
Visible, observable differences among people such as race, gender, age, or physical appearance
Deep-level diversity
Differences in values, beliefs, personalities, and attitudes that are not immediately visible
Inclusion
The degree to which employees feel welcomed, valued, and able to fully participate in the organization — goes beyond just representation
Diversity vs. Inclusion
Diversity is about who is present; inclusion is about whether those people can actually contribute and belong
Implicit bias
Unconscious attitudes or stereotypes that affect decisions and behavior without conscious awareness
Why diversity doesn't automatically improve outcomes
Without inclusion, diverse members may not feel safe contributing unique perspectives, so the potential benefit is never realized
Team effectiveness criteria
A team is effective when it meets performance goals, members are satisfied and able to continue working together, and the team grows in capability over time
Stages of team development
Forming → Storming → Norming → Performing (Adjourning for temporary teams); teams must work through conflict before becoming truly effective
Task conflict
Disagreement about work content, goals, or methods — can improve decision quality when managed well
Relationship conflict
Interpersonal tension or personal friction — almost always harmful to team functioning and morale
Advocacy vs. Inquiry
Advocacy = pushing your own position; Inquiry = asking questions to understand others' views. Effective teams balance both.
Common knowledge effect
Groups spend more time discussing information everyone already knows and less time on unique information held by only one member, leading to worse decisions
Groupthink
When a group prioritizes harmony and consensus over critical thinking, leading to poor unchallenged decisions
Social loafing
The tendency for individuals to exert less effort when working in a group than when working alone
Bases of power
Legitimate (role/position), Reward (ability to give rewards), Coercive (ability to punish), Expert (knowledge/skill), Referent (admiration/identification)
Persuasion / influence tactics
Strategies used to change others' attitudes or behaviors, such as rational persuasion, coalition building, ingratiation, or inspirational appeals
BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)
Your best option if negotiations fail; determines your walkaway point
Reservation price / Resistance point
The absolute worst outcome you will accept before walking away from a negotiation
Aspiration / Target price
Your ideal, optimistic goal in a negotiation — what you shoot for, not just what you'll settle for
ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement)
The range between each party's reservation price where a deal can be made
Distributive negotiation
A fixed-pie, win-lose approach where one party's gain is the other's loss (e.g., haggling over a single price)
Integrative negotiation
A collaborative approach that seeks to expand value by trading across multiple issues based on differing priorities
Anchoring
Setting the first offer to influence the negotiation range — first numbers tend to pull the final outcome toward them
Positions vs. interests
Positions are what parties say they want; interests are the underlying needs or reasons behind those demands. Integrative deals are built on interests.
Value creation vs. value claiming
Creating value = expanding what's available for both parties; claiming value = competing for a larger share of what exists
Package offers / tradeoffs
Offering multiple issues together rather than one at a time, allowing parties to trade on priorities and create mutual gain
Organizational culture
Shared assumptions, values, and beliefs that shape how members think and behave within an organization
Artifacts
Visible, surface-level elements of culture: office layout, dress code, rituals, language, stories
Espoused values
The stated principles and beliefs an organization officially promotes (e.g., mission statements)
Underlying assumptions
Deep, taken-for-granted beliefs that are rarely questioned and drive actual behavior — the core of culture
Culture as constraint
Culture can limit change or flexibility because deeply held assumptions are hard to challenge or shift
Centralization vs. decentralization
Centralized = decisions made at the top; Decentralized = decision-making authority pushed down to lower levels
Formalization
The degree to which rules, procedures, and job descriptions are written and standardized
Flat vs. tall hierarchy
Flat = few levels, wider span of control, faster communication; Tall = many levels, narrower span, more oversight
Departmentalization
How an organization groups jobs — by function, product, geography, customer, or some matrix combination
Trait approach to leadership
Leadership based on innate personal qualities (e.g., intelligence, drive, confidence) — focuses on who the leader is
Behavioral approach to leadership
Leadership based on what leaders actually do — task-oriented behaviors vs. people-oriented behaviors
Contingency approach to leadership
Effective leadership depends on the situation — no single style is always best; leaders must adapt to context
Leader emergence vs. leader effectiveness
Emergence = who is perceived as or steps into a leadership role; Effectiveness = who actually produces good outcomes. They are not always the same person.
Task-oriented vs. people-oriented leadership
Task-oriented focuses on goals, structure, and performance; people-oriented focuses on relationships, morale, and support
Big Five and leadership (OCEAN)
Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism. High extraversion and conscientiousness are often linked to leader emergence, but trait presence ≠ leader effectiveness.
Forces for change
Internal or external pressures that push an organization to change (e.g., technology, competition, regulation, workforce shifts)
Resistance to change
Opposition or reluctance from individuals or groups — stems from fear, habit, loss of status, mistrust, or unclear benefits
Resistance continuum
Resistance ranges from active opposition to passive non-compliance to quiet skepticism — not all resistance looks the same
Lewin's three-stage model
Unfreeze (disrupt the status quo) → Change (implement the new state) → Refreeze (stabilize and reinforce the new normal)
Emotional vs. rational pathways in change
Rational = make the logical case for change; Emotional = connect change to values, identity, and feelings. Both are needed.
Shareholder vs. stakeholder thinking
Shareholder view = maximize returns for owners; Stakeholder view = consider the interests of all affected parties (employees, community, customers, etc.)
CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)
A company's commitment to operating in socially and environmentally responsible ways beyond legal requirements
"Washing" (greenwashing, etc.)
When a company's public claims about social or environmental responsibility are not matched by actual practices
Creativity defined
An idea or output that is both novel (new, original) and useful (serves a purpose or solves a problem) — both conditions required
Brainstorming vs. brainwriting
Brainstorming = verbal group idea generation; Brainwriting = written, individual-first idea generation that reduces social pressure and dominance effects
Why change implementation fails
Poor communication, lack of credibility, ignoring stakeholder concerns, insufficient support, or moving too fast without building buy-in