Unit 2.4 Understanding Fallacies in Reasoning

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 6:34 PM on 4/21/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

30 Terms

1
New cards

Fallacy

An error in reasoning that may nevertheless appear at first glance to be correct reasoning (Herrick 2010:199).

2
New cards

Formal fallacy

An error in reasoning that arises in virtue of the logical structural form of the argument alone (rather than the content).

e.g. Affirming the Consequent: If P then Q; Q, therefore P.

  • Denying the Antecedent: If P then Q; Not P, therefore not Q.

3
New cards

Informal fallacy

An error in reasoning that arises in virtue of the content of the reasoning alone (rather than the logical form).

4
New cards

Affirming the Consequent

A formal fallacy where the argument takes the form: If p then q, q, therefore p.

5
New cards

Affirming the Antecedent

A valid argument form where the argument takes the form: If p then q, p, therefore q.

NEVER A FORMAL FALLACY since valid

  • e.g. "If it rains (P), the ground is wet (Q). It rained (P). Therefore, the ground is wet (Q)."

6
New cards

Denying the Antecedent

A formal fallacy where the argument takes the form: If p then q, not p, therefore not q.

e.g. "If it rains (P), the ground is wet (Q). It did not rain (Not P). Therefore, the ground is not wet (Not Q)." (Invalid, as the ground could be wet from sprinklers)

7
New cards

Denying the Consequent

A valid argument form where the argument takes the form: If p then q, not q, therefore not p.

8
New cards

Ad Hominem Fallacy

Rejecting a claim or argument by attacking the person who makes it rather than rationally assessing the claim/argument itself.

9
New cards

Argument A

1. All cats are 4-legged creatures; 2. All dogs are 4-legged creatures; Therefore, 3. All dogs are cats.

10
New cards

Argument B

1. All planets are spherical objects; 2. All tennis balls are spherical objects; Therefore, 3. All tennis balls are planets.

11
New cards

Argument C

1. All As are Bs; 2. All Cs are Bs; Therefore, 3. All Cs are As.

12
New cards

Example of Formal Fallacy

1. If Bill Gates earns a huge amount of money, then he's rich; 2. Bill Gates is rich; Therefore, 3. Bill Gates earns a huge amount of money.

13
New cards

Example of Valid Reasoning

1. If Oprah Winfrey earns a huge amount of money, then she's rich; 2. It's not the case that Oprah Winfrey earns a huge amount of money; Therefore, 3. It's not the case that she is rich.

14
New cards

Example of Non-Fallacious Argument

1. If Oprah Winfrey earns a huge amount of money, then she's rich; 2. It's not the case that Oprah Winfrey is rich; Therefore, 3. It's not the case that she earns a huge amount of money.

15
New cards

Example of Informal Fallacy

1. If Mia is a Liberal, Mia can't be trusted; 2. Mia is a Liberal; Therefore, 3. Mia can't be trusted [for anything].

16
New cards

Example of Hypocritical Argument

1. We may reasonably ignore all arguments made by 'hypocrites'; 2. X is hypocritical; Therefore, we may ignore X's arguments.

17
New cards

Tu quoque fallacy

Discrediting an argument due to hypocrisy. “You too”. Discrediting a person’s argument merely because they don’t act/live consistently with its conclusion.

18
New cards

Genetic fallacy

Fallacy that occurs when a claim is accepted or rejected based solely on its source or origin, rather than its content.

“People only believe that there is a God because they need an “invisible parent figure” that will help them cope with an “irrational and hostile world”. So, we should reject their claims about God and become atheists.” The Fallacy: Assuming that because a belief provides comfort or stems from a psychological need, it cannot also be true.

19
New cards

Composition fallacy

Assuming what's true of parts is true for the whole.

e.g. If an individual stands up at a football game, they can see better. Therefore, if everyone stands up, everyone can see better". (In reality, the view remains obstructed).

e.g. I can afford product 1. I can afford product 2. ….. Therefore, I can afford all products combined. The sum of the parts (total cost) likely exceeds the budget, even if individual parts do not.

20
New cards

Division fallacy

Assuming what's true of the whole is true for parts.

e.g. The US government is highly inefficient. Therefore, this specific House Speaker must be inefficient.

21
New cards

Appeal to popularity

Claiming something is true because many believe it.

BANDWAGON

When someone argues that a belief, action, or product is correct, true, or good simply because a large number of people believe, do, or use it.

e.g.

"Everyone is voting for this candidate, so they must be the best choice."

22
New cards

False dilemma

Presenting only two choices when more exist.

23
New cards

Appeal to ignorance

A logical fallacy claiming a proposition is true simply because it hasn't been proven false, or false because it hasn't been proven true.

e.g. No one has ever successfully proved that God exists, therefore God does not exist," or conversely, "No one has ever proved that God does not exist, therefore He does,".

24
New cards

Appeal to emotion

Using emotions as premises in an argument.

"Officer, I know I was speeding, but I’ve had a terrible week and my life is falling apart. Can't you let me off?". The driver uses pity to deflect from the evidence of speeding.

25
New cards

Red herring

Introducing irrelevant issues to distract from the argument.

e.g. "I know I forgot to wash the dishes, but look how clean the living room is!" (Diverts from chores to cleanliness). Think of toxic boyfriends

26
New cards

Straw man fallacy

Distorting, exaggerating, or misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack an opponent's position for easier attack.

e.g. We should tighten regulations on emissions to help the environment."

  • Person B: "So you want to destroy the economy and put thousands of people out of work?"

27
New cards

Begging the question

A logical fallacy where the premise of an argument assumes the truth of its conclusion, often resulting in circular reasoning.

e.g. Freedom of speech is important because people should be able to speak freely.

e.g. Ghosts are real because I have experienced things that can only be explained by paranormal activity.

28
New cards

Slippery slope

Arguing one step leads to extreme consequences.

e.g. If we allow this small tax increase, the government will eventually take 100% of our income

29
New cards

Hasty generalization

Drawing conclusions from insufficient evidence.

e.g. steoreotyping. I met two people in London and they were both rude. Therefore, everyone in London is rude.

e.g. medical claims: My grandfather smoked a pack a day and lived to be 95, so smoking isn't actually bad for you

30
New cards

Relativity effect

Decisions influenced by comparative options.

<p>Decisions influenced by comparative options.</p>