1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Dispositional Explanation – Importation Model: What does the Institutional aggression results from?
the characteristics of the prisoners themselves
Dispositional Explanation – Importation Model: Why are prisoners aggressive?
Irwin & Cressey (1962) argued that prisoners import their own characteristics (dispositions) into the prisons (often the reason they are sentenced in the first place) and continue to behave in this way
Prisoners import subcultures typical of criminality; including beliefs, norms, attitudes, learning experiences, and personal characteristics (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity)
Dispositional Explanation – Importation Model: Why does the outcome often include self harm, addiction and prisoner violence?
These groups are likely to become ‘disenfranchised’ and separated from mainstream society's norms and values that promote pro-social methods of meeting basic needs and solving interpersonal conflict
Many of these people will live in a subculture where aggression is valued, respected and reinforced
Alcoholism/Addiction: Weeks(1998) found higher levels of ‘serious institutional misconduct’ amongst prisoners rated with severe levels of alcohol dependence
Dispositional Explanation – Importation Model: A03
DeLisi et al (2011) studied juvenile delinquents in Californian prisons from many different negative backgrounds, including childhood trauma, anger, histories of substance abuse, and of violent behaviour
The study compared this group of inmates with a control group (without any such characteristics)
The negative background group were found to be more likely to engage in suicidal activity, sexual misconduct, and acts of physical aggression whilst in prison than the control group
It seems these behaviours were imported
Situational models: what does this model suggest?
This model recognises that the environment of the institution plays a part in the level of aggression exhibited by people/prisoners (physical, organisational and staff)
What do the deprivations include?
liberty, autonomy, goods and services, heterosexual relationships. security, overcrowding & inadequate living conditions.
Deprivations from these things lead to stress and frustration – leading to aggression
Situational models: AO3: Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment:
Psychologically healthy males were chosen (psychometric testing of volunteers prior to the study), yet ALL participants displayed aggressive behaviour in the prison environment
Aggression must have occurred because of the deprivations (and frustrations) of the prison environment itself rather than the personalities (dispositions) of the participants
This study can be used to support the Situational explanation, but also to challenge the Dispositional explanation
Issue/Debate:
These theories are hard determinist. They propose that ALL prisoners WILL display aggression in prison and so will be unable to change this behaviour
However, we know that prisoners are released from prison and can achieve parole if they choose to change their behaviour/reform
They must be using their freewill to behave differently in a prison environment
The theories would benefit from an interaction between determinism and freewill, and would be a more valid explanation of institutional aggression
The Popcorn Model:
Folger and Skarlicki (1995) suggest that the first individual to become aggressive is like the first piece of corn to pop when heated
They believe that it is important to seek which factors provide the general ‘heat’ rather than seek which specific factors made the first corn pop
i.e. sort out the prison environment itself, and reduce the amount of general aggression
The Management Model:
Dilulio (1987) Suggests that aggression in prisons occurs as a result of failed management, high staff turnover and a lack of discipline amongst staff
McCorkle et al (1995) studied a sample of 371 US state prisons – they found a strong correlation between poor administrative practices and levels of prison violence
Also of white prison staff experiencing higher levels of assault (on both inmates and staff)
Their data also showed the benefits of educative programmes in prisons (for prisoners and staff) to show the merits of prison treatment