Bioethics Exam 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/39

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:22 PM on 4/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

40 Terms

1
New cards

Nazi Medical Experiments

  • Conducted on concentration camp prisoners

  • Focused on military and ideological objectives

2
New cards

The Nuremberg Code

  • Outlined 10 principles for conducting ethical research

  • Non-binding

3
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki

  • Built on Nuremberg Code

  • Non-binding

  • For all physicians worldwide

4
New cards

Tuskegee Syphilis Study

  • No informed consent

  • Studied the long-term effect of leaving syphilis untreated

5
New cards

Willowbrook Hepatitis Study

  • Researchers intentionally infected disabled children with hepatitis

  • Led to Belmont Report and development of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

6
New cards

The Belmont Report

  • Provides the philosophical basis for “The Common Rule”, which governs human subjects research

  • Includes respect for persons, beneficence, and justice

7
New cards

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

Committee that reviews and monitors research involving human subjects

8
New cards

Necessary Conditions

Mandatory requirement - If A is necessary for B and A doesn’t occur/isn’t true, B can’t occur.

9
New cards

Sufficient Conditions

On its own is enough to fulfill a requirement

10
New cards

Emmanuel et al.’s 7 Requirements for Ethical Research

  1. Value

  2. Scientific Validity

  3. Fair Subject Selection

  4. Favorable Risk - Benefit Ratio

  5. Independent Review

  6. Informed Consent

  7. Respect for Enrolled Subjects

11
New cards

Vulnerability (in the context of subject selection for research)

Vulnerable populations were enrolled in research not because they expected to benefit from the research, but because they were convenient to study

12
New cards

Animal Research Ethics

Explores value-laden aspects of relationships between humans and non-human animals.

13
New cards

Anthropomorphism

Unwarranted attribution of human characteristics to non-human animals

14
New cards

Speciesism

Making judgements of moral status on the morally irrelevant factor of species membership

15
New cards

Reasons For Using Animals in Research

  • Reduces risk to humans

  • In vivo studies

  • Determine potential pharmacological action of investigational drugs and adverse effects in humans

  • Gain insight to veterinary applications

  • Increase biological knowledge about different species

16
New cards

Degrees of Severity of Pain/Suffering

  • Extreme - Intense pain, suffering, distress

  • Severe - severe pain, continuous suffering, significant fear, severe impairment

  • Moderate - Medium short-term or long-term slight

  • Mild - slight short term pain or impairment

  • Non-recovery - Suffering prevented during procedure but there may be slight distress pre-procedure

  • None

17
New cards

3 R’s of Animal Research

Replace, reduce, refine

18
New cards

Pros/Cons of Using Different Animals in Research

  • Chimpanzees/Rhesus Macaque - Most like humans, Expensive to obtain/take care of, difficult to control, require significant socialization and intellectual stimulation

  • Pigs and Sheep - Organs are similar, potential for gene editing/xenotransplantation

  • Dogs and Cats - Easy to obtain, complex mammals,

  • Mice and Rats - Inexpensive, short life span

19
New cards

Organ Transplantation

Process of moving a vital organ from one person to another

20
New cards

The Two Main Questions in Transplant Ethics

  1. How are we going to fix the organ shortage?

  2. How are we going to allocate organs in the meantime?

21
New cards

Transplant Evaluation Process Decision Points

  1. Hospital decides they are willing to transplant patient, put on waitlist

  2. National waitlist sends out transplant offers to specific patients

  3. Patient accepts or denies organ offer

22
New cards

OPTN’s Values Regarding Allocation in Organ Transplantation

Utility, justice, respect for persons

23
New cards

Living Donor Transplantation

Living donors can donate a kidney, or part of their liver, 97% of donations are direct - to someone they know

24
New cards

Coercion

  • Donors can back out at any moment

  • Advocate checks with both teams for signs of coercion

  • Each team has separate medical teams

25
New cards

Directed vs. Non-Directed Transplantation

Directed is to someone the donor specifies, non-directed is to anyone

26
New cards

Individual-level Harms vs. Community Harms

  • Individual-level harms are direct injuries and rights violations to a person

  • Community harms are social stigmatization of a group, inequity, or systemic risk

27
New cards

Community-Based Participatory Research

  • Community members act as partners, not just participants

  • Share a role in defining research questions, guiding the process, and interpreting results

28
New cards

Limitations of the Belmont Report

Lack specificity, outdated scope

29
New cards

Differences Between Public Health Ethics and Clinical Ethics

30
New cards

Childress et al.’s 5 Justificatory Principles

31
New cards

Nudges

32
New cards

Equality vs. Equity

33
New cards

Mill’s Harm Principle

34
New cards

Health Equity

35
New cards

Algorithmic Bias

36
New cards

Artificial Intelligence

37
New cards

Precision Medicine

38
New cards

Concerns about AI Use in Medicine

39
New cards
40
New cards