Zoe Gellert Exam 1 Notes

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/95

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key vocabulary terms and definitions from lecture notes on research methods, scientific inquiry, claims, validities, experimental designs, and threats to internal validity.

Last updated 4:44 PM on 9/29/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

96 Terms

1
New cards

Producer Role

The role of understanding research for coursework, grad school, or working in a research lab.

2
New cards

Consumer Role

The role of reading and understanding news stories based on research, or using research for career advancement.

3
New cards

Empiricists

Scientists who use instruments and firsthand evidence, often through quantitative and qualitative methods, to obtain knowledge through an individual's senses.

4
New cards

Reflexivity

Scientists' self-conscious consideration of how their background or privilege shapes their research questions and interpretations.

5
New cards

Theory-Data Cycle

The process by which scientists use collected data to test, change, or update their theories.

6
New cards

Falsifiable

A characteristic of good theories, meaning they can be proven wrong.

7
New cards

Theory

A broad set of statements describing how variables relate to each other.

8
New cards

Hypothesis

A specific prediction derived from a theory.

9
New cards

Data

A set of observations used to test a hypothesis or theory.

10
New cards

Universalism (Merton's Norm)

Scientific claims are evaluated based on their merit, independent of the researcher's credentials or reputation.

11
New cards

Communality (Merton's Norm)

Scientific knowledge is created by a community, and its findings belong to that community.

12
New cards

Disinterestedness (Merton's Norm)

Scientists strive to discover the truth, unbiased by profit, politics, conviction, or idealism.

13
New cards

Organized Skepticism (Merton's Norm)

Scientists question everything, including their own theories.

14
New cards

Applied Research

Research conducted to solve a specific, efficient problem, with directly applicable findings to real-world issues.

15
New cards

Basic Research

Research aimed at enhancing the general body of knowledge about a particular topic or scientific principle.

16
New cards

Translational Research

Research that applies findings from basic research to develop practical applications and confirm findings on a broader scale.

17
New cards

Comparison Group

A group in a research study that allows for the systematic comparison of outcomes between different conditions.

18
New cards

Confound Variables

Other explanations for a research study's findings, which good research controls for to isolate factors.

19
New cards

Probabilistic

A characteristic of research findings, meaning they are not expected to explain all cases all the time, but rather a certain proportion.

20
New cards

Availability Heuristic

A cognitive bias where people are persuaded by what easily comes to mind, often ignoring what is not immediately present.

21
New cards

Present/Present Bias

The tendency to focus on what is present and fail to look for absences, leading to overlooking non-significant results.

22
New cards

Confirmation Bias

The tendency to focus on evidence that supports one's existing beliefs or thinking.

23
New cards

Blind Spot Bias

The belief that one is unlikely to fall prey to cognitive biases, despite evidence of others doing so.

24
New cards

Disinformation

The deliberate creation and sharing of information known to be false.

25
New cards

Variable

A factor that varies and must have at least two levels (values).

26
New cards

Measured Variable

A variable whose levels are observed and recorded without being manipulated by the experimenter.

27
New cards

Manipulated Variable

A variable that the researcher controls, usually by assigning participants to different levels of that variable.

28
New cards

Abstract Concepts

Theoretical constructs like 'infant temperament' or 'anxiety' that need to be defined operationally for empirical testing.

29
New cards

Operational Definition

The specific way a conceptual variable is turned into a measured or manipulated variable for a study.

30
New cards

Operationalize

The process of turning a conceptual definition into a measured or manipulated variable.

31
New cards

Frequency Claim

A claim that describes a particular level or degree of a single variable, often expressed as a percentage or rate.

32
New cards

Association Claim

A claim that argues one level of a variable is likely to be associated with a particular level of another variable, indicating a correlation.

33
New cards

Causal Claim

A claim that one variable causes a change in the level of another variable, typically supported by experiments and meeting specific criteria.

34
New cards

Internal Validity

The extent to which variable A is responsible for changes in variable B, rather than another confounding variable (C).

35
New cards

External Validity

The extent to which the results of a study generalize to a larger population, other times, or situations.

36
New cards

Construct Validity

How well the variables in a study are measured or manipulated; the extent to which operational variables approximate conceptual variables.

37
New cards

Statistical Validity

How well the numbers support the claim being made, considering the effect size, precision of estimate, and replicability.

38
New cards

Covariance (for Causal Claims)

A criterion for causal claims stating that the study results show as variable A changes, variable B also changes.

39
New cards

Temporal Precedence (for Causal Claims)

A criterion for causal claims stating that the causal variable (A) must come first in time, before the outcome variable (B).

40
New cards

Self-Report Measure

A method of measuring variables where participants provide information about themselves, e.g., questionnaires.

41
New cards

Observational Measure

A method of measuring variables by directly observing and recording behavior.

42
New cards

Physiological Measure

A method of measuring variables by recording biological data, such as brain activity or hormone levels.

43
New cards

Categorical Variable (Nominal)

A variable whose levels are qualitatively described and have no meaningful numerical order.

44
New cards

Quantitative Variable

A variable whose levels are coded with meaningful numbers.

45
New cards

Ordinal Scale

A quantitative scale where levels represent a rank order (e.g., first, second, third), but distances between levels are not equal.

46
New cards

Interval Scale

A quantitative scale with meaningful intervals between numbers but no true zero point (e.g., IQ scores, temperature in Celsius/Fahrenheit).

47
New cards

Ratio Scale

A quantitative scale where zero means 'none' of the variable (e.g., height, weight, number of correct answers on a test).

48
New cards

Reliability

The consistency of a measure, ensuring consistent scores over time, across raters, or internally among its items.

49
New cards

Test-Retest Reliability

The consistency of scores every time a measure is used for the same individual.

50
New cards

Interrater Reliability

The consistency of scores no matter who does the measuring, typically between different observers.

51
New cards

Internal Reliability

The consistency of a pattern of responses regardless of how the researcher has phrased the question, especially for multi-item scales.

52
New cards

Face Validity

A subjective measure of construct validity, indicating that a measure appears to measure what it's supposed to.

53
New cards

Content Validity

A subjective measure of construct validity, ensuring the measure contains all the parts that the underlying theory says it should contain.

54
New cards

Criterion Validity

An objective measure of construct validity, evaluating whether the measure is associated with a concrete behavioral outcome that it should be associated with.

55
New cards

Known-Groups Evidence for Criterion Validity

A method to gather evidence for criterion validity by seeing if scores on a measure can discriminate between two or more groups whose behavior is already confirmed.

56
New cards

Convergent Validity

An objective measure of construct validity, where a measure should correlate highly with scores on other measures of the same construct.

57
New cards

Discriminant Validity

An objective measure of construct validity, where a measure should not correlate too highly (or at all) with measures of theoretically dissimilar constructs.

58
New cards

Independent Variable (IV)

The variable that is manipulated by the researcher, with different 'conditions' or levels.

59
New cards

Dependent Variable (DV)

The measurable outcome variable in an experiment that is influenced by the independent variable.

60
New cards

Controlled Variable

A variable that an experiment holds constant to minimize its influence on the dependent variable.

61
New cards

Control Group

A group in an experiment that receives no treatment or a neutral level of the independent variable, serving as a baseline for comparison.

62
New cards

Treatment Group

A group in an experiment that receives a non-neutral level of the independent variable.

63
New cards

Placebo Group

A type of control group that receives an inert treatment but believes they are receiving an active treatment.

64
New cards

Confounds

Possible alternative explanations for an observed outcome in a study, posing a threat to internal validity.

65
New cards

Design Confounds

A threat to internal validity caused by a mistake in designing the independent variables, where a second variable systematically varies with the intended IV.

66
New cards

Systematic Variability

When a second variable happens to vary along with the intended independent variable, creating a design confound.

67
New cards

Between-Subjects Design

An experimental design where different groups of participants are exposed to different levels of the independent variable (also called independent-groups design).

68
New cards

Posttest-Only Design

A between-subjects design where participants are randomly assigned to groups and the dependent variable is measured only once after the experiment.

69
New cards

Pretest/Posttest Design

A between-subjects design where the dependent variable is measured both before and after the manipulation of the independent variable.

70
New cards

Random Assignment

A method used in experiments to ensure that individual differences of participants are about the same in each group, enhancing internal validity.

71
New cards

Within-Subjects Design

An experimental design where participants experience all levels of the independent variable, allowing for comparisons within the same individuals (also called repeated measures).

72
New cards

Concurrent Measures Design

A type of within-subjects design where participants are exposed to all levels of an independent variable at one time, and their preference is measured.

73
New cards

Order Effects

A threat to internal validity in within-subjects designs where the order of conditions influences participants' responses (e.g., practice or fatigue effects).

74
New cards

Counterbalancing

A method to control for order effects in within-subjects designs by presenting the different levels of the independent variable in various sequences.

75
New cards

Latin Square

A common technique for partial counterbalancing, ensuring each condition appears equally often in each position and before and after every other condition.

76
New cards

Manipulation Check

An additional dependent variable included in a study to ensure that the manipulation of the independent variable actually worked as intended.

77
New cards

Pilot Study

A small-scale, preliminary study conducted before the main research to test procedures, manipulations, and measures.

78
New cards

Maturation Threat

An internal validity threat where an observed change in an experimental group could be due to natural changes or improvements over time, not the treatment.

79
New cards

History Threat

An internal validity threat where an external event or factor (other than the treatment) occurring between pretest and posttest systematically affects most members of the treatment group.

80
New cards

Regression Threat

An internal validity threat occurring when a group's average score is unusually extreme at Time 1, making it likely to be less extreme (closer to the mean) at Time 2.

81
New cards

Attrition Threat

An internal validity threat occurring when there is a systematic reduction in participant numbers from pretest to posttest, especially if specific types of participants drop out.

82
New cards

Testing Threat

An internal validity threat where a change in participants results from taking a test (the DV) more than once (e.g., practice effects or fatigue effects).

83
New cards

Instrumentation Threat

An internal validity threat occurring when the measuring instrument changes over time, or observers change their standards for coding behaviors.

84
New cards

Observer Bias

An internal validity threat where a researcher's expectations influence the interpretation of results.

85
New cards

Demand Characteristics

An internal validity threat where participants guess the study's purpose and change their behavior accordingly.

86
New cards

Placebo Effects

An internal validity threat where participants improve simply because they believe they are receiving a treatment, not due to the treatment itself.

87
New cards

Double-Blind Placebo Control

An experimental setup where neither the participants nor the individuals administering the treatment know who is receiving the true therapy versus a placebo.

88
New cards

Null Effects

An experimental outcome that shows no significant difference between groups or no significant correlation, potentially due to weak manipulations or insensitive measures.

89
New cards

Weak Manipulations

A reason for null effects where the independent variable was not changed enough between levels to produce a detectable difference.

90
New cards

Insensitive Measures

A reason for null effects where the dependent variable measure is not precise enough to detect existing differences.

91
New cards

Ceiling Effect

A type of insensitive measure where all scores on the dependent variable are at the high end, making it impossible to see true differences.

92
New cards

Floor Effect

A type of insensitive measure where all scores on the dependent variable are at the low end, making it impossible to see true differences.

93
New cards

Measurement Error

The degree to which a recorded or measured variable differs from its true value, which can contribute to null effects.

94
New cards

Individual Differences

Variability among participants in a study that can spread out scores within groups and obscure between-group differences, contributing to null effects.

95
New cards

Situation Noise

Unrelated events or distractions in the environment that create unsystematic variability within groups of participants, potentially leading to null effects.

96
New cards

Power (Statistical Validity)

The likelihood that a study will yield a statistically significant result when the independent variable truly has an effect.