PSYC333 Test 2 Content

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/86

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:27 AM on 6/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

87 Terms

1
New cards

Emotional Suppression

Emotional suppression is the inhibition of the outward expression and/or internal experience of emotions from others. It is considered an inherently interpersonal emotion regulation strategy.

2
New cards

What were the main findings of Low et al. (2017) regarding emotional suppression and personal goals?

Emotional suppression predicted:

  • Increased depressed mood

  • Lower support and closeness

  • Lower goal effort

  • Lower goal competence

  • Lower goal success over time

3
New cards

Why might emotional suppression hinder goal achievement?

Suppression is cognitively effortful and may divert attention and resources away from problem-solving and goal-directed behaviour.

4
New cards

How do interaction partners typically perceive people who suppress emotions?

They are perceived as:

  • Poorer communicators

  • Less authentic

  • Less responsive

  • Less extraverted

5
New cards

Cognitive Reappraisal

An emotion regulation strategy involving changing how one thinks about a situation to alter its emotional impact.

6
New cards

What behaviours indicate cognitive reappraisal during conflict discussions?

  • Open expression of emotions

  • Team-oriented thinking ("we" and "us" language)

  • Constructive problem-solving

  • Remaining calm

7
New cards

According to Low et al. (2018), how did suppression and reappraisal affect conflict resolution?

  • Suppression → poorer conflict resolution

  • Reappraisal → more successful conflict resolution

8
New cards

When can emotional suppression be beneficial?

When it serves prosocial goals or social harmony, such as:

  • Preventing escalation during arguments

  • Maintaining professionalism

  • Protecting others' feelings

9
New cards

Why are the costs of suppression lower in some Asian cultures?

Asian cultures often prioritise social harmony and interdependence, making suppression feel more authentic and socially appropriate.

10
New cards

What is the difference between hedonic and instrumental motives for emotion regulation?

  • Hedonic: Regulating emotions to feel good or avoid feeling bad.

  • Instrumental: Regulating emotions to achieve a goal or improve performance.

11
New cards

What are the three main types of instrumental motives discussed in Lecture 2?

  1. Performance motives

  2. Prosocial motives

  3. Impression management motives

12
New cards

What is interpersonal emotion regulation (IER)?

The process of either:

  • Turning to others to regulate one's own emotions, or

  • Trying to regulate another person's emotions.

13
New cards

What are the four defining characteristics of interpersonal emotion regulation?

  1. Goal-directed

  2. Emotion-focused (affective target)

  3. Deliberate and effortful

  4. Socially focused

14
New cards

What is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic IER?

  • Intrinsic IER: Using others to regulate your own emotions.

  • Extrinsic IER: Trying to regulate another person's emotions.

15
New cards

Rumination

Repetitive, self-focused dwelling on negative feelings, symptoms, or problems that occurs alone and is associated with depression.

16
New cards

What are the four defining features of co-rumination?

  • Rehashing problems repeatedly

  • Mutual encouragement to discuss problems

  • Speculation about causes and consequences

  • Dwelling on negative emotions

17
New cards

What are the major costs and benefits of co-rumination?

Costs:

  • Increased depression

  • Increased anxiety

  • More rumination

  • Greater risk of depressive disorders

Benefits:

  • Greater friendship quality

  • Increased closeness

  • Feeling validated, supported, and cared for

18
New cards

What is the difference between expressive and instrumental voting?

  • Expressive voting: Voting reflects identity, values, and group membership ("This is who I am").

  • Instrumental voting: Voting is based on achieving desired outcomes ("Which option benefits me most?").

19
New cards

What question is at the heart of voting behaviour research?

"Is voting an act of affirmation or of choice?"

  • Affirmation: Expressing identity.

  • Choice: Selecting the most beneficial option.

20
New cards

What is the Sociological Model of voting?

Voting is shaped by social group memberships (e.g., class, religion, ethnicity).

  • Group memberships are stable.

  • Voting patterns tend to be stable.

  • Combines expressive and instrumental elements.

21
New cards

What is the Michigan Model?

Voting is driven by psychological identification with a political party.

  • Party identification is a powerful predictor of voting.

  • Based on Social Identity Theory.

  • Primarily an expressive model.

22
New cards

What is Rational Choice Theory (RCT)?

People vote according to cost-benefit calculations.

  • Aim to maximise personal utility.

  • Voting is primarily instrumental.

  • Popular in the 1960s/70s.

23
New cards

How are "left" and "right" traditionally defined?

  • Left: Supports greater equality and social change.

  • Right: Supports hierarchy, tradition, and resistance to equality-based change.

24
New cards

Why is ideology difficult to measure?

People can hold mixed views:

  • Socially liberal but economically conservative.

  • Liberal and conservative labels can mean different things to different people.

  • Ideology is often multidimensional.

25
New cards

What did Sidanius' factor analyses reveal about political ideology?

Political attitudes cluster into factors such as:

  • Political-economic conservatism

  • Racism

  • Religion

  • Authoritarianism

  • Social inequality

  • Xenophobia

26
New cards

What factors emerged in Marc Wilson's New Zealand factor analysis?

  • Capitalism vs Socialism

  • Racism

  • Aotearoa-specific issues

  • Colonisation/Crown relations

  • Religion and social issues

27
New cards

What is Social Dominance Theory?

Societies are organised into group-based hierarchies that tend to maintain themselves over time.

Groups differ in status based on:

  • Age

  • Gender

  • Arbitrary group memberships

28
New cards

What is Social Dominance Orientation (SDO)?

A preference for group-based inequality and hierarchy.

High-SDO individuals:

  • Support inequality.

  • Prefer hierarchy-enhancing systems and occupations.

  • Tend to show more prejudice.

29
New cards

What are hierarchy-enhancing (HE) and hierarchy-attenuating (HA) roles?

HE roles: Maintain inequality

  • Military

  • Police

HA roles: Reduce inequality

  • Teachers

  • Doctors

  • Social workers

30
New cards

What are legitimising myths?

Beliefs that justify and maintain social hierarchies.

Examples:

  • Meritocracy ("People get what they deserve")

  • Paternalistic myths

  • Sacred myths

31
New cards

What are the three components of Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA)?

  1. Authoritarian submission – obey authorities.

  2. Authoritarian aggression – punish rule-breakers.

  3. Conventionalism – preference for traditional values.

32
New cards

How do SDO and RWA differ?

SDO:

  • Focuses on hierarchy and inequality.

  • "Some groups should dominate others."

RWA:

  • Focuses on authority, conformity, and tradition.

  • "People should obey authorities."

33
New cards

According to Jost et al., what motivates political conservatism?

Three motivations:

  1. Epistemic: Desire for certainty and closure.

  2. Existential: Desire for safety and security.

  3. Ideological: Protection of group interests and dominance.

34
New cards

What are the two pathways to prejudice in Duckitt's Dual Process Model?

Route 1

Punitive socialisation → Dangerous world beliefs → RWA → Prejudice

Route 2

Unaffectionate socialisation → Competitive-jungle beliefs → SDO → Prejudice

35
New cards

What are the two core dimensions underlying many social, political, and scientific attitudes?

  • Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) – preference for authority, conformity, and social order.

  • Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) – preference for hierarchy and group-based inequality.

36
New cards

What are the three categories of prejudice identified by Duckitt & Sibley (2007)?

  1. Derogated groups – viewed as inferior or undesirable (e.g., obese people, people with disabilities).

  2. Dangerous groups – viewed as threatening (e.g., terrorists, drug users).

  3. Dissident groups – viewed as challenging social norms (e.g., feminists, atheists, protestors).

37
New cards

How does Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) predict prejudice?

SDO predicts prejudice toward:

  • Derogated groups

  • Dissident groups

38
New cards

How does Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) predict prejudice?

RWA predicts prejudice toward:

  • Dangerous groups

  • Dissident groups

39
New cards

What are the two worldviews in Duckitt's Dual Process Model?

Dangerous-World View

  • The world is threatening and unsafe.

  • Leads to RWA.

Competitive-Jungle View

  • The world is a ruthless competition for power.

  • Leads to SDO.

40
New cards

How does the Dual Process Model explain prejudice?

Dangerous World → RWA → Prejudice toward threatening groups

Competitive Jungle → SDO → Prejudice toward low-status/challenging groups

41
New cards

Why might conservatives be less positive toward vegans?

RWA pathway:

Vegans challenge traditional lifestyles and norms.

SDO pathway:

Vegans challenge human dominance over animals and nature.

42
New cards

What did Brandt et al. (2014) find about prejudice?

Both liberals and conservatives display prejudice.

  • Liberals dislike groups perceived as conservative.

  • Conservatives dislike groups perceived as liberal.

43
New cards

What is the Gateway Belief Model (GBM)?

People may be more likely to accept scientific conclusions if they learn that most scientists agree on an issue.

Scientific consensus → Greater acceptance of science

44
New cards

Why doesn't scientific consensus always change people's beliefs?

Because belief change depends on:

  • Trust in scientists

  • Political ideology

  • Conspiracy beliefs

  • Existing worldviews

45
New cards

What is conspiracy ideation?

A tendency to believe hidden groups secretly manipulate important events.

Associated with:

  • Distrust of authorities

  • Distrust of scientists

  • Rejection of scientific findings

46
New cards

What predicts rejection of climate change science?

Strong predictors include:

  • RWA

  • SDO

  • Conservatism

  • Free-market economic beliefs

  • Low trust in scientists

Political ideology is often a stronger predictor than conspiracy beliefs.

47
New cards

What predicts political, social, and economic attitudes?

Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoratarianism

48
New cards

What is Homo Economicus?

A theoretical model of humans as:

  • Rational

  • Self-interested

  • Utility-maximising

Assumes people make optimal decisions based on complete information

49
New cards

What is Expected Utility Theory (EUT)?

A normative theory of decision-making that states people should choose the option that maximises expected utility.

Assumes:

  • Complete information

  • Sufficient time

  • Motivation to optimise

50
New cards

What are the six principles of Expected Utility Theory?

  1. Ordering of alternatives

  2. Cancellation

  3. Dominance

  4. Transitivity

  5. Continuity

  6. Invariance

Violations of these principles suggest irrational decision-making.

51
New cards

What is the principle of dominance?

If Option A is better than Option B on all relevant dimensions, a rational person should choose A.

Example: A computer with better specifications at the same price dominates the alternative.

52
New cards

What is transitivity?

If:

  • A > B

  • B > C

Then:

  • A > C

Preferences should be logically consistent.

53
New cards

What is a heuristic?

A mental shortcut or "rule of thumb" used to make judgments quickly and efficiently.

Usually useful, but can produce systematic biases.

54
New cards

What is the representativeness heuristic?

People judge probability based on how much something resembles a stereotype or category.

Problem: Can lead to ignoring actual probabilities.

55
New cards

What is the conjunction fallacy?

The mistaken belief that:

A + B is more likely than A alone.

Example: The Linda problem.

A conjunction can never be more probable than one of its components.

56
New cards

What is base-rate neglect?

gnoring known statistical information in favour of descriptive information.

Engineer-Lawyer Example:
People ignore the 30/70 distribution and focus on personality descriptions.

57
New cards

What is the hot hand fallacy?

The belief that recent success increases the probability of future success.

Research suggests success often becomes less likely after a streak due to statistical regression.

58
New cards

What is the gambler's fallacy?

The belief that random events are "due" to occur after a streak.

Example: Believing a roulette wheel is due to land on black after several reds.

Random events remain independent.

59
New cards

What is the availability heuristic?

People judge probability based on how easily examples come to mind.

Example: Overestimating shark attacks because they receive extensive media coverage.

60
New cards

What is the simulation heuristic?

People judge events as more likely if they are easier to imagine.

Example: A disease with familiar symptoms seems more likely than one with unfamiliar symptoms.

61
New cards

What is anchoring and adjustment?

People begin with an initial value (anchor) and adjust from it.

The adjustment is usually insufficient, producing biased judgments.

62
New cards

Why is anchoring considered powerful evidence against purely rational decision-making?

Even:

  • Random anchors

  • Irrelevant anchors

  • Extreme anchors

Can influence judgments and estimates.

63
New cards

What is the difference between self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors?

Self-generated anchors

  • Require active adjustment

  • Influenced by effort and motivation

Experimenter-provided anchors

  • More automatic

  • Less affected by incentives or forewarning

64
New cards

What is bounded rationality?

Herbert Simon's idea that decision-making is constrained by:

  • Limited information

  • Limited time

  • Limited cognitive resources

People cannot always optimise.

65
New cards

What is satisficing?

Choosing an option that is "good enough" rather than searching endlessly for the optimal choice.

A key feature of bounded rationality.

66
New cards

What is a nudge?

A small change to the choice environment that influences behaviour without:

  • Removing options

  • Forcing choices

  • Changing economic incentives

Works through automatic decision process

67
New cards

What is gamification?

Using game elements in non-game contexts to encourage behaviour change.

Common elements:

  • Points

  • Levels

  • Leaderboards

  • Achievement systems

Designed to increase motivation and engagement.

68
New cards

Mental Accounting

Categorising and evaluating money/outcomes in separate mental accounts (e.g., income, wealth, future income).

69
New cards

Windfall gain

Money treated as "new" or separate from existing finances (e.g., tax refunds).

70
New cards

Framing effect

Different choices arising from equivalent outcomes presented in different ways.

71
New cards

Invariance

Rational choices should not change when equivalent options are framed differently.

72
New cards

What is the key idea of Prospect Theory?

People evaluate gains and losses relative to a reference point rather than objective outcomes.

73
New cards

How do people typically respond to gains versus losses?

Risk-averse for gains, risk-seeking for losses.

74
New cards

What is loss aversion?

Losses are psychologically more impactful than equivalent gains.

75
New cards

How do people distort probabilities according to Prospect Theory?

They overweight small probabilities and underweight moderate/high probabilities.

76
New cards

The Endowment Effect

People value possessions more simply because they own them.

77
New cards

How does the Endowment Effect affect buying and selling?

Willingness to sell exceeds willingness to pay for the same item.

78
New cards

What is the sunk-cost effect?

Continuing with a choice because of past investments that cannot be recovered.

79
New cards

What is inaction inertia?

Avoiding a current opportunity because a better opportunity was previously missed.

80
New cards

What does Norm Theory propose?

Emotional reactions depend on comparisons between reality and alternative possibilities.

81
New cards

What is counterfactual thinking?

Imagining how past events could have turned out differently.

82
New cards

What is the difference between upward and downward counterfactuals?

Upward = things could have been better; Downward = things could have been worse.

83
New cards

What functions do upward and downward counterfactuals serve?

Upward → preparation and learning; Downward → emotion regulation.

84
New cards

What are the two modes in REM?

Evaluative mode (affective contrast) and reflection mode (affective assimilation).

85
New cards

How does regret change over time?

Actions are regretted more immediately; inactions are regretted more in the long term.

86
New cards

What are the two components of regret? (Decision Justification Theory)

Negative outcome comparison and self-blame for the decision.

87
New cards

Why is debiasing difficult?

Biases often operate outside awareness, motivation, or conscious control (mental contamination).