1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Elements
The defendant must show:
· They lost self-control
· The loss of self-control was caused by a qualifying trigger
· A person of the defendant’s age and sex with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint would have reacted in the same way.
Loss of control test
The jury looks into the mind of the defendant to see if they lost control, this is a subjective test.
Jewell [2014] on the definition of loss of control
loss of control involves the loss of the ability to act in accordance with considered judgment or a loss of normal powers of reasoning
Jewell [2014] on pre-meditation
pre-meditation disqualifies loss of self-control.
Dawes [2013] on S54(2)
The loss of control need not be sudden because people react differently in grave circumstances
Qualifying Triggers
· A fear of serious violence to the defendant from the victim
· Things said or done which constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character which caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged.
· A combination of the two
What disqualifies a qualifying trigger?
The defendant causes the victim’s behaviour
Sexual infidelity
Rejmanski [2017]
the defendant’s mental condition can be taken into account when deciding whether an act or insult was a serious wrong.
However it cannot be used in relation to the objective test
Clinton [2012]
sexual infidelity alone is not a qualifying trigger, but if it is relevant to the context in which self-control is lost, the defence may still be available.
Criticisms of the Sexual Infidelity Clause in Clinton [2012]
Sexual infidelity is known to cause losses of self-control
It allows people to rely on a lesser qualifying trigger when the true cause is sexual infidelity
It is difficult to separate sexual infidelity from the other circumstances
Sexual infidelity can be used in diminished responsibility
Dawes [2013] and Cumulative Impact
the defendant’s circumstances are taken into account. After a long series of incidents, the qualifying trigger may be the final straw.