1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
subjective territoriality
jurisdiction over all acts that are completed abroad if they are initiated on the territory of the State
objective territoriality
jurisdiction over an offence that is completed on a State’s territory
Lockerbie case, 1988
example of territorial principle
Eichmann case, 1961
universality principle (more like nothing else applied though)
Arrest Warrant ICJ, 2000-2002
Belgium lost; in 2003 they amended the legislation and now there is requirement for some connection to Belgium (like most other European States’ legislation).
par in parem non habet imperium
equals do not have authority over one another; immunity
rex non potest peccare
the king can no do wrong; initial absolute immunity for rulers in civil and criminal matters
acte iure imperii
governmental or sovereign acts
acte iuri gestionis
commercial acts
The Charkieh, 1873
UK High Court of Admirality; one of the first examples of the restricted approach to immunity, where the government (…) only has immunity if they act as sovereign, not as a commercial player in a dispute.
opinio iuris sive necessitas
the belief that an action was carried out as a legal obligation (based on Treaty, CIL etc)
International Treaties as sources of immunity
European Convention on State Immunity - 1972
UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property - 2004
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations - 1961
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations - 1963
relevant case law for jurisdictional immunity of states
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening) - ICJ judgement, 2012
The ICJ judged that state immunity holds in regard of war crimes etc too, so Italian domestic courts cannot make judgements about Germany in civil cases.
ratione personae
personal immunity = from the position a representative holds in a state
ratione materiae
funcitonal immunity = relates to the function of the representative
4 exceptions to protection from criminal jurisdiction to incumbent FMs; Arrest Warrant ICJ
- criminal prosecution by courts in home state
- home state expressly waives immunity
- criminal prosecution before international courts
- prosecution after term expires
→ for acts committed either before or after office
→ for private acts committed during office
national case about restrictions on immunity
Pinochet case; UK courts
Pinochet was a former Chilean dictator/ HoS. UK courts found that he was not entitled immunity from prosecution for the crimes of torture → comnission of these crimes cannot amount to official acts, as there is no way that a HoS has to make this decision to effectively run the country.
ILC report on crimes under IL in respect of which functional immunity shall not apply
- genocide
- CAH
- WC
- apartheid
- enforced disappearances
- torture
nationality vs citizenship
individual and State’s relationship on the international level vs individual’s position within the State
ius soli
gaining citizenship based on the place of birth
ius sanguinis
gaining citizenship based on the parent’s nationality
population transfer/ ethnic cleansing
historical examples include slavery and dispossession of indigenous peoples
can only be legal under IL if: 1, has the consent both the moved and the host population; 2, if consent was given free of direct on indirect negative pressure
European Convention on Nationality 1997
regarding state succession:
- respect for HR
- avoidance of statelessness
- factors to be taken into account when determining sb’s nationality (genuine link, residence, place of birth, wish/ will)
Background: migration, mixed marriages, EU free movement principle
Aspects covered: acquisition, loss and recovery; procedures relating to nationality; military obligation in case of multiple nationalities (…)
UN Convention on The Reduction of Statelessness 1961
- SPs should grant their nationality to people under certain conditions, if otherwise they would be stateless
- SPs should not deprive individuals of their nationality if it would render them stateless
- SPs should generally ensure that the application of their loves does not result un stateless people under their jurisdiction
relevant ICJ case regarding the nationality of legal persons
Barcelona Traction (Belgium v Spain) 1970
flag of convenience
a ship is registered in a country that is not the same as its captain. pretty common, but often thought of as contentious. it is done to avoid e.g. regulations or costs in the otherwise home country.
Registration Convention 1986
- not yet in force
- goal: genuine link between flag state and vessel
- problem: compromise provisions that would provide SP considerable leeway to implement these principles
prerequisites for diplomatic protection
- internationally wrongful act (defendant State has violated the minimum standard)
- they are/ it is of their nationality
- exhaustion of local remedies
ius ad bellum/ ius contra bellum
probition of the use of force
ius in bello
rules about how hostilities must be conducted: LoAC
Hague Law
rules on the conduct of hostilities; regarding the means of and methods of warfare 1899/1907
1954 Cultural Property Convention
1980 Certain Conventional Weapons Convention and Protocol
Geneva Law: 1949
Conventions I - IV; protection for the most vulnerable groups
Injured in the Field, Injured at Sea, POWs, Civilians
Additional Protocols I & II, 1977
persons hors de combat
combatants, when they are unable to fight; injured, wounded, unconscious etc
armed conflict definition, from Tádic/ ICTY
AC = whenever there is a resort to armed force between states OR protracted armed violence between governmental forces and organized armed groups OR between such organized armed groups within a state.
Humanity Principle of IHL
prohibition of unnecessary suffering; requires humane treatment of all persons, especially civilians and POWs.
Distinction Principle of IHL
parties of a conflict must distinguish between civilians and military persons and objectives; only military objectives can be attacked
Military Necessity Principle of IHL
the only measures allowed are those that are taken to achieve a legitimate military objective; this does not justify actions prohibited by the IHL
→ the only legitimate military necessity is to weaken the military capacity of the other side.
Proportionality Principle of IHL
attacks that are expected to cause excessive collateral civilian damage are prohibited; the collateral damage must be proportionate to the expected military gain.
lex specialis
if two laws govern the same factual situation, then the law governing the specific subject matter (lex specialis) will override the other one, which govern general matters.
International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission, 1991
permanent objective international body; purpose is to investigate allegations of grave breaches of IHL
the 3 exceptions to immunity from civil jurisdiction in personal capacity for personnel on diplomatic missions
- an action relating to private, inmovable property in the territory of the receiving state
- an action relating to succession, in which the diplomatic agent is involved as a private person and not as a representative of the state
- an action relating to private, professional or commercial activity exercised in the receiving state.
LaGrand case, ICJ; Germany v. US, 2001
the authorities shall inform the person concerned without any delays of their rights under this paragraph.
Convention respecting the Limitation of the Employment of Force for Recovery of Contract Debts - 1907
aka. Drago-Porter Convention; adopted at the Hague Conference in 1907
concerns of powerful states using military force to collect unpaid debt from weaker countries; to limit gunboat diplomacy and encourage arbitration
Kellog-Briand Pact, 1928
the SPs condemn the recourse to war and promise to settle all their disputes by peaceful means
Escalating spectrum of conflict
1. Retorsion (~hostile diplomacy, not unlawful)
2. Countermeasures (otherwise illegal, but justified as a response to a prior wrongful act)
3. Threat of force
4. Use of force (border skirmishes, limited strikes) (prohibited except for the 2 exceptions)
5. Armed Attack = triggers the right to self defense; large-scale attacks, invasion etc.
6. Aggression; manifest violation such as invasion, occupation, annexation; ~ armed attack, just bigger in scale etc; stronger legal and political condemnation
aggression (UNGA Res. 3314, 1974)
the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity of political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the UN
4 exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force
1. Right to self-defense
2. UNSC authorization
3. Humanitarian Intervention
4. Protection of Nationals Abroad