Entrepreneurial Law: Contract, IP, Data Protection, and Tort Law

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/45

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering the key concepts from Lectures 4 through 7 on Entrepreneurial Law, including Contract, IP, Data Protection, and Tort Law.

Last updated 9:41 AM on 5/26/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

46 Terms

1
New cards

Patent Requirements

The requirements for patentability are: Novelty, Non-obviousness, Usefulness.

2
New cards

Novelty

An invention must be new, meaning it has not been publicly disclosed or known before the patent application date.

3
New cards

Non-obviousness

The invention must not be obvious to someone skilled in the relevant field, ensuring that the innovation is significant and inventive.

4
New cards

Usefulness

The invention must have a specific, substantial, and credible utility, meaning it must provide some identifiable benefit.

5
New cards

Freedom of Contract

A principle meaning parties are generally free to decide the terms of their agreement, although they are influenced by legal rules like mandatory vs. default rules.

6
New cards

Contracts (Shavell, 2003)

Mutually beneficial agreements between parties that help plan future events or behaviour, such as the future provision of goods and services or the reallocation of risks.

7
New cards

Counteroffer

A response that rejects the original offer and creates a new offer, meaning the original offer cannot be accepted later.

8
New cards

Capacity

The legal requirement that parties must be capable of understanding the nature and consequences of an agreement; minors, mentally incapacitated, or intoxicated individuals often have limited capacity.

9
New cards

Statute of Frauds

A legal rule requiring certain contracts, such as real estate sales or high-value goods, to be in writing to prevent false claims about oral agreements.

10
New cards

Plain Meaning Rule

An objective approach to contract interpretation where courts look at the ordinary and literal meaning of the words used if the wording is clear.

11
New cards

Parol Evidence Rule

An objective approach stating that when parties have a written contract, later oral statements or outside evidence usually cannot be used to change the meaning of the written document.

12
New cards

Contra Proferentem Rule

A rule stating that if a contract term is ambiguous or unclear, the ambiguity is interpreted against the party who drafted the contract.

13
New cards

Procedural Unfairness

Unfairness in the way a contract was formed, such as through the use of pressure, deception, or unclear terms.

14
New cards

Intellectual Property (IP)

Creations of the mind, such as inventions, artistic works, symbols, and designs, which give creators exclusive legal control over their use.

15
New cards

Copyright

An automatic right that protects the expression of literary and artistic ideas against copying or reproduction, but not the ideas, procedures, or methods themselves.

16
New cards

Moral Rights

Rights protecting the personal connection between the author and the work, including the paternity right and protection against derogatory treatment.

17
New cards

Patent

An exclusive right granted for an invention (product or process) providing a new technical solution, generally lasting for 20 years from the date of filing.

18
New cards

Patent Claims

The most important part of a patent application that defines the scope of legal protection, typically written as a single sentence.

19
New cards

Patent Opposition

A 9-month period after a European patent is granted during which third parties can challenge its validity before the European Patent Office (EPO).

20
New cards

Trademark

A sign capable of being represented in a register that is distinctive enough to distinguish the goods or services of one undertaking from those of others.

21
New cards

Dilution

The weakening of the distinctiveness of a famous trademark through use in unrelated markets.

22
New cards

Tarnishment

When a trademark becomes associated with inappropriate or low-quality products, damaging its brand image.

23
New cards

Design Protection

Legal protection for the visual appearance (shape, lines, colors) of a product that is new and has individual character.

24
New cards

12-month Grace Period

The period provided in design law after a design is first disclosed to the public during which protection can still be sought.

25
New cards

Personal Data

Any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person, such as names, IP addresses, or student numbers.

26
New cards

Profiling

The automated processing of personal data to analyze or predict aspects such as a person's work performance, health, or location.

27
New cards

Consent (GDPR)

A legal basis for processing that must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous, requiring an active step rather than silence or inaction.

28
New cards

Necessity

The principle that data processing must genuinely be needed to achieve a legitimate objective using the least intrusive option available.

29
New cards

Controller

The person or organization that determines the purposes and means of processing personal data.

30
New cards

Processor

A separate person or organization that processes personal data on behalf of the controller based on instructions.

31
New cards

Data Protection Officer (DPO)

An independent expert who monitors GDPR compliance; they cannot be individuals who determine the purposes and means of processing (e.g., CEOs or heads of IT).

32
New cards

Tort

A non-contractual legal wrong that causes injury or harm to another person's physical, financial, or reputational interests.

33
New cards

Factual Causation

The determination of a causal link between conduct and harm based on the 'but for' test.

34
New cards

Vicarious Liability

A rule where one person (typically an employer) is held legally responsible for the wrongful acts of another (an employee) during work-related activities.

35
New cards

Strict Liability

Legal responsibility that exists even without proving fault or negligence, commonly applied to keepers of animals or manufacturers of defective products.

36
New cards

Defective Product

A product that does not provide the level of safety that people may reasonably expect, assessed based on presentation and foreseeable use.

37
New cards

Intention to Create Legal Relations

A fundamental principle indicating that parties must intend their agreement to have legal consequences for it to be enforceable.

38
New cards

Consideration

A legal concept referring to something of value that is exchanged between parties when entering into a contract.

39
New cards

Void Contract

A contract that is not legally enforceable due to a lack of essential elements such as capacity, consideration, or legality.

40
New cards

Unilateral Contract

A contract where only one party makes a promise or offer that is binding upon them if the other party completes a specific act.

41
New cards

Breach of Contract

The failure of one party to fulfill their obligations under a contract without a valid legal excuse.

42
New cards

Damages

Monetary compensation awarded to a party in a legal dispute for losses incurred due to a breach of contract.

43
New cards

Specific Performance

A legal remedy that compels a party to execute a contract according to its terms, typically used when monetary damages are insufficient.

44
New cards

Non-disclosure Agreement (NDA)

A legally binding contract that prohibits one party from disclosing certain information to third parties.

45
New cards

Patent Requirements

The requirements for patentability are: Novelty, Non-obviousness, Usefulness.

46
New cards

Patent Requirements

The requirements for patentability are: Novelty, Non-obviousness, Usefulness.