2310

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/23

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:10 PM on 4/17/24
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

24 Terms

1
New cards

Plato’s Criticisms of Knowledge as “True Belief with an Account”

Plato challenges the sufficiency of true belief for constituting knowledge, proposing that knowledge also requires an account.

2
New cards

Locke’s Theory of “Ideas,” Critiques by Berkeley, Hume

Locke introduces ideas as the primary units of understanding, critiqued by Berkeley and Hume for immaterialism and skepticism about external reality.

3
New cards

Berkeley’s Argument Against Material Substance and Idealism

Berkeley argues against material substances, positing that only minds and ideas exist, with reality being fundamentally mental or spiritual.

4
New cards

Reid’s Argument Against “The Ideal System” and for Direct Perception

Reid critiques indirect perception, advocating for common sense realism with direct perception connecting us to the external world.

5
New cards

Russell’s Sense-Data Theory, Its Relation to Earlier Theories of “Ideas”

Russell's theory states that immediate objects of perception are sense-data, not the objects themselves, related to earlier theories of ideas.

6
New cards

Arguments Against the Sense-Data Theory

Critics suggest direct experiences with objects over sense-data theory, complicating the understanding of perception.

7
New cards

Descartes’s Methodological Skepticism and Its Purpose

Descartes uses skepticism to find indubitable truths, leading to the foundational "cogito, ergo sum."

8
New cards

Hume’s “Mitigated” Skepticism

Hume doubts empirical knowledge and causation but upholds belief and reasoning based on habit.

9
New cards

Putnam’s Critique of the “Brain in a Vat” Skeptical Hypothesis

Putnam challenges the brain in a vat hypothesis as self-refuting due to language reference issues.

10
New cards

Moore’s “Proof of an External World”

Moore uses simple demonstrations to prove the external world, countering skepticism.

11
New cards

Carroll and Hume on Skepticism About Logic

Carroll presents a logical paradox, while Hume critiques inductive reasoning's foundation.

12
New cards

Trust and Testimony

Hume on Testimony and Miracles, Reid’s Reply:Hume questions testimony reliability, especially on miracles, countered by Reid defending testimony and belief in miracles.

13
New cards

Burge on Testimony in the Context of “Content Preservation”

Burge highlights the preservation of content in testimonial exchanges, emphasizing testimony's reliability.

14
New cards

Baker’s Defense of the Rationality of Trust

Baker argues trust is rational, essential for knowledge acquisition and social interaction.

15
New cards

Plato vs

Plato sees math from eternal Forms, Kant argues for synthetic a priori knowledge grounded in intuition.

16
New cards

Analytic vs

Kant distinguishes analytic and synthetic propositions, introducing synthetic a priori knowledge.

17
New cards

Russell’s Theory of Universals and His Criticism of Kant

Russell advocates for realist universals theory, criticizes Kant's synthetic a priori knowledge.

18
New cards

Conventionalism and the Geometry of Space

Conventionalism argues geometry truths are not empirical but conventional, influenced by non-Euclidean geometries and relativity.

19
New cards

Verification and the Elimination of Metaphysics

Logical positivists use verification to separate scientific discourse from metaphysics.

20
New cards

Quine’s Account of “Old Epistemology”

Quine critiques traditional epistemology, proposing a naturalized approach grounded in empirical sciences.

21
New cards

Quine’s Psychological Account of Epistemology

Quine's naturalized epistemology includes a psychological perspective on human cognition.

22
New cards

Kim’s Defence of Normative Epistemology

Kim defends normative epistemology, emphasizing normative standards and a priori reasoning.

23
New cards

Haack on Why Epistemology Isn’t Dead Yet

Haack defends the relevance of epistemology against radical naturalism and skepticism.

24
New cards

Knowledge, Appearance, and Reality

Explores the relationship between perceptions, beliefs, and the external world, highlighting philosophical challenges.