1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Why is Psycholinguistics part of Cognitive Psychology?
Language is a mental faculty (part of the mind)
Relies on key cognitive systems:
Long-term & short-term memory
Information processing mechanisms
Attention
Auditory & visual perception
Studies how the mind understands, produces, and stores language
What are the main language units from smallest to largest?
Letters / phonemes (smallest sound or written units)
Morphemes (smallest units of meaning)
Words
Phrases
Clauses
Sentences
Discourse (largest unit of language use)
Why is syntax important for understanding sentences?
Syntax = study of sentence structure
Understanding requires grouping abstract units (phrases, clauses)
Humans can:
Produce completely new sentences
Understand sentences never encountered before
Create infinitely long/complex sentences
Judge grammaticality without prior exposure
This is possible because sentences follow underlying structure
Why does sentence structure (syntax) matter?
Sentences do have structure
Same words ≠same meaning:
Word order changes meaning
Sentence processing ≠just combining word meanings
Some sentences are ungrammatical despite clear meaning
Shows sentences are more than word meanings alone
Syntax operates independently from semantics (meaning)
How does syntactic independence show that syntax ≠meaning?
Some sentences are grammatical but meaningless
e.g. “Colourless green ideas sleep furiously”
Some sentences are ungrammatical and meaningless
We can judge grammaticality without relying on meaning
Shows sentence structure ≠word meaning
Syntax operates independently of semantics
How does semantic ambiguity show that meaning depends on syntax?
Some sentences have multiple interpretations
Example: “The policeman saw the thief with the binoculars”
Policeman has binoculars
Thief has binoculars
Same words → different meanings
Ambiguity comes from different underlying structures
Shows meaning (semantics) can depend on syntax
What is the difference between competence and performance?
Competence = knowledge of grammar rules
Performance = actual language use in real situations
People don’t always follow rules in performance:
Speech errors, stutters, slips
Grammatical sentences can still be hard to understand
Complexity (e.g. nested clauses) increases difficulty
Ungrammatical ≠difficult
Shows a gap between what we know and how we use language
How do competence and performance differ in linguistics?
Distinction proposed by Noam Chomsky
Competence:
Knowledge of language rules
Studied by theoretical linguists
Reflects ideal language use
Performance:
Actual language production & comprehension
Studied by psycholinguists
Affected by processing limits
Errors or difficulty ≠lack of competence
Shows real language use can be imperfect despite underlying knowledge
What is competence and how do we form a mini-grammar?
Competence = intuitive knowledge of language structure
We can form rules/principles based on this knowledge
Helps explain:
Why sentences are grammatical or ungrammatical
Why different structures → different meanings
Why some sentences are ambiguous
How sentences are related
A set of these syntactic rules = grammar
How do rules on word groups (phrases) support grammar?
Aim: create universal rules → Universal Grammar (Chomsky)
But languages also have language-specific grammars
Phrases act as single units in sentences
Some phrases can be moved (e.g. “in the morning”)
Movement shows what counts as a phrase
Not all movements are allowed → some are ungrammatical
Non-phrases cannot be moved
Helps identify structure and build grammatical rules
What are the main types of phrases in syntax?
NP (Noun Phrase): head (most important word) = noun
e.g. The gentleman, John
VP (Verb Phrase): head = verb
e.g. left the old building, slept
PP (Prepositional Phrase): head = preposition (usually first word)
e.g. in the morning
Each phrase is built around a head word that determines its type
How can sentence structure be visualised and what does it show?
Sentence structure can be shown using tree diagrams
Based on phrase structure rules
Helps show how sentences are related and share structure
S (Sentence / S’ Clause) = whole sentence or clause
Contains a tensed verb
Example structures:
John slept in the morning = one S
Two clauses can combine into one sentence:
John slept… and he got up…
Visualisation reveals underlying syntactic organisation
What are phrase structure rules and what is hierarchical structure in sentences?
Sentences have hierarchical structure (phrases inside phrases)
Phrase Structure Rule 1:
S → NP + VP
Sentence = Subject (NP) + Predicate (VP)
Example: The farmer injured a cow with an axe
NP = The farmer
VP = injured a cow with an axe
Shows sentences are built from embedded phrase units
What is Phrase Structure Rule 2 for a verb phrase (VP)?
VP always contains a verb (V)
VP may also include:
Direct object (NP)
Prepositional phrase (PP)
Example: [NP] The farmer [VP] injured a cow with an axe
V = injured
NP (object) = a cow
PP = with an axe
Shows VP can be expanded with additional phrases
What is Phrase Structure Rule 3 for a prepositional phrase (PP)?
PP always consists of:
Preposition (P) + Noun Phrase (NP)
Structure: PP → P + NP
Example: [NP] The farmer [VP] injured a cow [PP] with an axe
P = with
NP = an axe
Shows PP is built from a head preposition + noun phrase complement
What is Phrase Structure Rule 4 for a noun phrase (NP)?
NP often consists of:
Determiner (Det) + Noun (N)
Structure: NP → Det + N
Example: The farmer injured a cow with an axe
NP: the farmer → Det = the, N = farmer
NP: a cow → Det = a, N = cow
NP: an axe → Det = an, N = axe
Shows NP is built from a specifier (Det) + head noun
How do phrase structure rules and lexical rules describe sentence structure?
Words are embedded in phrases, and phrases in other phrases (hierarchical structure)
Phrase structure rules (general grammar rules):
S → NP + VP
VP → V + (NP) + (PP)
PP → P + NP
NP → (Det) + N
Apply to many sentences in the language
Lexical rules (word-specific rules):
V → injured
P → in
Det → the, a
N → farmer, cow, axe
Phrase structure rules = sentence structure framework
Lexical rules = actual word meanings used in sentences
What is generative grammar and what role do phrase structure rules play?
Theory by Noam Chomsky
Grammar uses a limited set of rules
Rules must:
Generate all possible grammatical sentences
Block ungrammatical structures
Phrase structure rules are central to this system
Explains how humans can produce infinite sentences from finite rules
How do phrase structure rules explain infinite sentence formation?
Phrase structure rules allow many combinations
Enable production of infinite syntactic structures
Recursiveness (embedding/nesting):
Rules can include versions of themselves
Iteration (repetition):
Rules can be applied repeatedly
Together, recursion + iteration explain unlimited sentence complexity
What is recursion in phrase structure rules?
Recursion = rules that can apply within themselves
Creates nesting/embedding of phrases
Example: PP inside PP inside PP…
in the box / under the table / in the room…
Structure builds layered meaning (like Russian dolls)
Tree diagrams grow deeper (vertical expansion)
Allows potentially infinite sentence structure
What is iteration in phrase structure rules?
Iteration = repeated use of the same structure
Multiple phrases added in a sequence (not nested)
Example: repeated VP coordination
[S, [[NP]], Peter /VP/ met the woman, /VP/ tried to hide, /VP/, found an exit, /VP/, ran away…
Structure shows parallel elements
Tree diagrams grow horizontally (adding branches)
Unlike recursion, iteration = side-by-side repetition