First Amendment Practice Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering First Amendment principles, standards for speech restrictions, and key legal definitions from the lecture notes.

Last updated 8:01 PM on 5/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

25 Terms

1
New cards

State Action

The principle that plaintiffs can only challenge government action under the 1st Amendment.

2
New cards

Incorporation

The doctrine under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment that makes most of the Bill of Rights apply to the states as well as the federal government.

3
New cards

Strict Scrutiny

The standard applied to content-based restrictions requiring a compelling state interest and narrow tailoring to that interest with no other options.

4
New cards

Content-Based Restriction

A government regulation of speech that targets what is being said.

5
New cards

Brandenburg Standard

Rule excluding speech from 1st Amendment protection where there is a (1) call to imminent danger/lawless action and (2) high risk of nonspeculative, imminent harm.

6
New cards

Prior Restraint

An executive or judicial order prohibiting a communication before it has occurred.

7
New cards

Fighting Words

Unprotected speech that is face-to-face, would provoke a reasonable person, and has low social value.

8
New cards

Low Value Speech

Classes of speech, such as lewd, obscene, profane, or libelous words, whose benefit is outweighed by social interest in order and morality.

9
New cards

Actual Malice

The legal standard for public officials in defamation cases where the speaker false identifies facts with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.

10
New cards

Chilling Effect

The phenomenon where fear of legal penalties or expensive civil lawsuits leads to self-censorship and handicaps free expression.

11
New cards

Miller Test

A three-part test for obscenity: (1) appeals to prurient interest, (2) depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and (3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

12
New cards

Prurient Interest

An element of obscenity defined by contemporary community standards that encompasses both arousal and disgust.

13
New cards

Content-Neutral Restrictions

Regulations based on 'time, place, and manner' that are not focused on the message or content of the speech.

14
New cards

Intermediate Scrutiny

The standard applied to content-neutral restrictions requiring a substantial government interest and narrow tailoring, though not necessarily the least restrictive alternative.

15
New cards

Public Forum

Government property traditionally open to the public for general purposes and speech, such as parks and sidewalks.

16
New cards

Nonpublic Forum

Government property reserved for particular governmental uses where the government has wide latitude to regulate activities, such as military bases or airports.

17
New cards

Viewpoint Neutral

A requirement for restrictions in nonpublic forums stating the regulation must apply to everyone for all purposes regardless of the specific message.

18
New cards

True Threats

Statements where the speaker intended to threaten and a reasonable person would perceive it as a threat, such as in Counterman v. Colorado.

19
New cards

Defamation

Speech that tends to reduce a person's reputation; plaintiffs must prove the speech was defamatory and, if a public figure, satisfy actual malice.

20
New cards

Facially Neutral

A status indicating a statute is not content-based on its face because the government does not need to look at content to understand if the rule is violated.

21
New cards

Underinclusive

A flaw in a regulation where it only targets a small percentage of the problem it aims to address.

22
New cards

Overinclusive

A flaw in a regulation where it restricts too much protected speech beyond what is necessary to serve the government interest.

23
New cards

Marketplace of Ideas

An argument for free speech suggesting that open expression allows the best ideas to prevail through public discourse.

24
New cards

Hostile Audience

A situation where a speaker is restricted because an angry crowd gathered and the threat of violence reached a point where the government acted to suppress the speaker.

25
New cards

Adequate Alternatives

A requirement for content-neutral restrictions stating that speakers must have other sufficient means to communicate their message.