1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Level 1 detail
Main pattern types : arch loop whorl
Level 2 detail
The path a specific ridge takes - where it starts and ends, how it interacts to other ridges
What are the major ridge events
Dot, Ridge ending, Bifurcation
What are characteristics of level 2 detail
Dot , ridge ending, bifurcation
Level 3 details
ACE-V , A stands for
Analysis- Data collection phase
ACE-V, C stands for
Comparison
ACE-V, E stands for
Evaluation- Support or reject hypothesis
ACE-V, V stands for
Verification
3 requirements to be a loop
1. looping ridge without ridges
2. Delta
3. ridge count across looping ridge
Ulnar
pointed toward pinky
radial
pointed toward thumb
Henry Classification
each finger assigned a number
H. Class- Whorl
number in ratio form
H. Classification allows for how many groupings
1024 primary groupings
H. Class of even fingers
1 + (Sum of even values)
H. class- of odd fingers
1+(odd sum of fingers)
NCIC Classification
new classification system
Comparision
A side-by-side examination of latent/unknown impression and a known impression
evaluation
examining all correspondence and non-correspondence noted during comparision phase at all three levels of detail and render a conclusion
we start with latent first because
it helps avoid mindset influence
mindset influence
if we start with a clear image (the known) the brain may form an expectation and trick us into seeing the same feature in the unclear image when it is not present
why are no two prints exactly the same
distortion and differences within tolerance
identification/ individualization
The unknown impression was made by the same source as the known exemplars
Inconclusive similarities cannot be identified
There are similarities noted between the unknown impression and the known exemplars however, the similarities are not sufficient to identify
Inconclusive quality of latent
Due to the quality of the latent or unknown orientation, a conclusion cannot be rendered.
Inconclusive quality of knowns
Due to the quality of the known exemplars a conclusion cannot be rendered
Inconclusive differences cannot exclude
There are differences noted between the unknown impression and the known exemplars; however thedifferences are not sufficient to exclude
Exclusion
The unknown impression was not made by the same source as the known exemplar