1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Grady (2012) - Current Views on Compensation
defined by studies of individual differences.
need combination of neuroimaging + behavioural studies to see brain activity in context of cog. capacity.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
benefits → change in activity of neurons (plasticity, cortical excitability) (Nitsche et al., 2007).
underlying mechanisms → dependent on neurostransmitters GABA + glutamate (Stagg et al., 2009).
tDCS - Cognitive Enhancements
Zimermann et al. (2013) → complex motor skill acuisition enhanced 24hrs-post.
Flöel et al. (2012) → improved object-location learning at 1-week follow-up.
tDCS - Sustained Benefits
Park et al. (2014) → improved accuracy of verbal WM at 4-week follow-up.
Jones et al. (2015) → enhanced verbal/visual WM 1month follow-up (+transfer to non-trained tasks).
Boggio et al. (2012) → visual WM improvement in mild-mod Alzheimer’s.
Neural Enhancement
Meinzer et al. (2013) → word-generation deficit reversal in odler adults (inferior frontal gyrus).
Meinzer et al. (2014) → improved semantic word retrieval in MCI Ps to control level + reduced over-activity in frontal gyrus regions.
Methodological Considerations
Fertonani et al. (2014) → state-dependent effects; older = benefit more from stim. during training.
Fujiyama et al. (2014) → older = delayed response to tDCS.
Learmonth et al. (2015) → education+baseline performance predict repsonse.
Laakso et al. (2015); Tatti et al. (2016) → older need stimulation for higher current and longer duration.