luck et al

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:36 AM on 4/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

31 Terms

1
New cards
2
New cards

What is the main goal of the HuRI project described in this paper?

To generate a systematic, comprehensive reference map of the human binary protein-protein interactome (HuRI) to study cellular organization, genome function, and genotype-phenotype relationships

3
New cards

How many protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and proteins does HuRI contain?

Approximately 53,000 PPIs involving 8,275 proteins

4
New cards

How does the size of HuRI compare to previous high-quality curated interactions from small-scale studies (Lit-BM)?

HuRI has about four times as many PPIs as Lit-BM

5
New cards

What is the name of the human ORFeome version used in this study, and how many protein-coding genes does it cover?

hORFeome v9.1 covers 17,408 protein-coding genes (~90% of the protein-coding genome)

6
New cards

Which experimental assay was primarily used for systematic screening of binary PPIs?

Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay

7
New cards

How many different Y2H assay versions were used, and why?

Three versions; they are complementary, increasing sensitivity and detecting more PPIs than using a single version

8
New cards

What fraction of direct contact pairs within protein complexes does HuRI capture compared to Lit-BM?

90% for HuRI versus 81% for Lit-BM (P = 0.019, two-sided Fisher's exact test)

9
New cards

What is the estimated coverage of HuRI relative to the entire human binary protein interactome?

Approximately 2-11% of the total binary protein interactome

10
New cards

What is a profile similarity network (PSN), and what does it reveal?

A network where proteins with similar interaction partners are linked; it reveals functional relationships between proteins even when sequence identity is low

11
New cards

Give an example of a protein pair with low sequence identity but high interaction profile similarity mentioned in the paper.

TMEM258 and C19ORF18 (10% sequence identity but share 80% of their interaction partners)

12
New cards

How does HuRI coverage compare to Lit-BM for genes with few publications?

HuRI covers the genome-by-genome space more uniformly, while Lit-BM is highly biased toward the most studied genes

13
New cards

What percentage of HuRI PPIs involving the best-studied genes are already in Lit-BM?

Approximately 40%

14
New cards

What confounding factors correlate with protein interaction degree in literature-curated networks but not in HuRI?

Protein popularity (publication count) and endogenous expression level

15
New cards

After correcting for popularity and expression level, what happens to the correlation between interaction degree and gene essentiality?

The correlation is substantially reduced, suggesting it was confounded by technical biases

16
New cards

Which protein was tested as a potential recruiter of proteins into extracellular vesicles (EVs)?

SDCBP (syntenin-1)

17
New cards

What experimental method was used to validate SDCBP's role in EV recruitment?

Knockout of SDCBP in U373vlll cells followed by proteomic analysis of EVs

18
New cards

How many of six SDCBP interaction partners showed significantly reduced EV protein levels upon SDCBP knockout?

Three (CALM1, CEP55, HPRT1)

19
New cards

What is a tissue-preferentially expressed (TiP) gene?

A gene whose expression is enriched in one or a few tissues compared to others

20
New cards

How many tissue-specific PPI networks were derived from HuRI, and how many PPIs does each contain on average?

35 tissue networks, each containing about 25,000 PPIs

21
New cards

What is the dominant interaction pattern between TiP and non-TiP proteins in tissue networks?

Extensive interactions between TiP and non-TiP proteins, but few TiP-TiP PPIs

22
New cards

In how many of the 35 tissues are TiP proteins significantly close to each other in the network?

Only six of 35 tissues

23
New cards

What explains the enrichment of TiP-TiP proximity in four of those six tissues?

Clusters of specifically expressed keratins (KRT) or late-cornified envelope (LCE) proteins

24
New cards

What does the paper conclude about how tissue-specific functions arise?

TiP proteins adapt basic cellular processes by interacting with uniformly expressed proteins, rather than forming isolated TiP-only modules

25
New cards

How does the fraction of tissue-specific PPIs in HuRI compare to the fraction of tissue-specific genes in the genome?

The fraction of tissue-specific PPIs is higher than the fraction of tissue-specific genes

26
New cards

What is a key limitation of Y2H assays mentioned in the paper?

Limited sensitivity; cannot detect PPIs that depend on post-translational processing unique to human cells or require additional partners for stabilization

27
New cards

Where can the HuRI data be accessed?

At http://interactome-atlas.org and through IntAct with identifier IM-25472

28
New cards

What is the name of the final HuRI dataset version published in 2020?

HI-III-20 (Human Interactome obtained from screening Space III, published in 2020)

29
New cards

How many PPIs are in the union of HuRI and all previous CCSB systematic screens (HI-union)?

64,006 binary PPIs involving 9,094 proteins

30
New cards

What orthogonal assays were used to validate Y2H-derived PPIs?

MAPPIT (mammalian protein-protein interaction trap) and GPCA (Gaussia princeps complementation assay)

31
New cards

According to the paper, what role do weaker and more transient PPIs play in the interactome?

They may dominate the protein interactome, which explains why most HuRI PPIs were found in only one scr