1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
cognitive psychology
scientific study of the mind & internal processes:
input
storage
transformation
input → ?
how we take info in
sensation & perception
storage → ?
how we keep info
learning & memory
transformation → ?
how we use info
decision making, language, & problem solving
What is the most important factor in successful learning?
what you think about while studying—relates to shallow & deep processing methods
Stephen Chew’s “Beliefs that Make You Stupid”
learning is fast
knowledge is composed of isolated facts
being good at a subject is a matter of inborn talent
i’m really good at multi-tasking
learning is fast
dunning & kruger:
tested college students on various skills (logic, grammar, & humor)
students in low percentiles estimated they were going to score higher (i.e. 12th percentile → 62nd percentile)
Why is learning not fast?
fluency trap
fluency trap
think you’re fluent/knowledgable about topic/subject because you’re familiar with the material (seen the material & understand it because you are reading over it)
metacognition
awareness & understanding of one’s own thought processes
knowledge is a list of facts
studying a list → rote memorization
learning requires understanding relationships
levels of processing theory
craik & tulving
method: participants were shown words & asked questions that forced them to use a level of processing
result: deep processing → better memory
levels of processing theory
structural/shallow - appearance (i.e. spelling)
phonemic/deeper - how it sounds like (i.e. what it rhymes wihth
semantic/deepest - meaning & relation to other concepts
i’m either a natural at this or i’m not
ability is malleable ≠ fixed
dweck’s growth vs. fixed mindset
participants: 373 students in 7th grade assigned to a fixed or growth mindset
results: both mindsets started off with similar scores → growth mindset achieved higher scores, while fixed mindset achieved the same or lower scores
dweck’s growth vs. fixed mindset
growth mindset:
brain is a muscle
intelligence grows & develops
fixed mindset: intelligence is static
i’m good at multi-tasking
deep processing killer → keeps in shallow processing mode
heavy time & cognitive cost → requires big shift in attention & less efficient
i.e. going on phone during lecture → dedicating less cognitive resources to both activities
direct violation of how attention works
attention bottleneck
switch-cost
cognitive control in media multi-taskers
participants: heavy (HMM) & light (LMM) media multi-taskers
HMM - jug many streams of info at once
method: tested ability to filter out irrelevant information with distractors & no distractors & measured by response time
results: HMM were more susceptible to irrelevant information → more you multi-task, the worse it is for you
no distractors: HMM & LMM had similar response times
distractors: HMM took significantly longer than LMM to filter out junk
attention bottleneck
limited capacity for attentional resources (so much our brain can focus on at one time)
switch-cost
lag & mistakes that occur when multi-tasking
how to study
retrieval practicing/testing effect
elaboration
spacing effect
interleaving
retrieval practice/testing effect
prevent forgetting
examples in class: quizzes, iClicker, closed-book dump
examples outside of class: close notes & create your own tests & flashcards
elaboration
asking “why?” & “how does this connect?”
connecting info to things you already know
examples in class: contemporary examples, home labs, & textbook
examples outside of class: relating concepts to personal experiences
the spacing effect
study in shorter sessions & ≠ one long session
examples in class: regular at-home quizzes & 4 exams
examples outside of class: reviewing lectures more often
interleaving
mixing up learning
examples in class: revisiting old lecture topics & connecting them to other lecture topics
examples outside of class: ≠ only revisit lecture of that week but mix it up review other weeks’ content
ebbinghaus forgetting curve
exponential decay of information in 24 hours
70% of content learned in one lecture will be forgotten if it’s ≠ used