1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
In the opening, the affirmatory should offer ____________ and ___________ ________
clarification
contractual framing
Resolution Analysis
Refers to placing the debate proposition into an appropriate genre as an initial step in interpretation
The three types of resolution analysis are....
Policy, value, and fact
Fact
Something true
Ex: Liz is awesome
Value
Introduces judgment and argue about worth
Ex: Is the death penalty good or bad
Policy
Should, agent of present
Quazi policy
Value judgement with no plan of action
Prima Facia
Addresses all the issues inherent in an argument
Direct Attack
Challenges their knowledge
Three I's of Direct Attack
Incomprehensible, incorrect, and ill-founded
The three stock issues
Harms, inherent, solvency
Harms
Everything is fine
Inherent
Minor repair
Solvency/solution
Counter proposal
Stock argument
Prove something is wrong and why we should change it
Should you define a term by the dictionary or an expert
expert
Unlinked Argument
Does not require they meet all conditions
4 I's of Indirect Attacks
Inadmissible, irrelevant, insignificant, inconsistent
Incomprehensible Attack
Not definitive
Incorrect Argument
Wrong-ontological stance
Ill-founded Argument
Lacking sufficient reason
Inadmissible Argument
Ex: A new argument is brought up in the rebuttal stage
Irrelevant Argument
Unrelated to the argument
Insignificant
Claim carries no weight
Inconsistent
Doesn't follow points
Turning the Link
You agree with the linkage but argue that it will lead to a different outcome.
Can you turn the link and impact?
No
What's the only job of the affirmative
get dem ppl to say YES to the resolution
Is on-case or off-case arguments first?
On-case
On-case
relevant to the case, the affirmative case
Off-case
Not attacking the case, but rather the resolution.
Three types of syllogism
Categorical, hypothetical, disjunctive
Categorical Syllogism
-If A then B
-A
-Therefore B
Hypothetical Syllogism
-If A then B
-If B then C
-Therefore, if A then C
Disjunctive Syllogism
-Either A or B
-Not A
-Therefore B
Beardsley's Model of Argument
Premise -> Claim
Divergent
C C C
\ | /
P
Serial
C
/
P
\
C
Convergent
C
/ | \
P P P
Simple
C
|
P
Toulmin Model
More complex, tells you what you already know but remodeled.
1. Number Each Sentence
2. Arrange in a way that makes sense
Delivery
Look at your audience and say it like you mean it!
Toulmin Model Example
2 3
\ /
1 5
\ /
4
Status Quo
The way things are before the proposed change
3 types of Argument
Logical, rhetorical, and dialectical
Logical argument
an argument based on deductive reasoning, which uses facts, definitions, and accepted properties in a logical order
Dialectical argument
a form of reasoning in which participants with different viewpoints engage in structured, reasoned exchange to arrive at a deeper understanding or truth, rather than to “win” a debate.
Rhetorical Argument
a form of reasoning aimed at persuading an audience through practical reasoning