1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
homo economicus assumption
consumers behave rationally
do not exist according to Richard Thaler
consider all options and work out which one gives the most satisfaction and utility
consumers will always seek to maximise their utility
consumers act in their own self-interest
consumers have perfect information
homo economicus
rational
have perfect info
extremely intelligent, and are able to perform complex calculations quickly
seeks to maximised their own utility
decisions based on self-interest
consistent preferences over time
no self-control problems
unbiased
homo sapiens
bounded rationality
incomplete information
not as intelligent as homo economicus
limited ability to perform complex calculations
social beings and make decisions based on a social context
changes in taste over time
may have self-control issues
perfect information
assumption
all economic agents have access to the same information at the same time
perfect information on price and quality of all products
issues
in the real world, there are information asymmetries where different levels of information are available
limitations to the amount of information that homo sapiens can process → information overload (due to internet)
bounded rationality
the notion that the rationality of consumers is limited by the information they have access to
also they do not have the time nor the cognitive abilities to process and evaluate all the options
self-interest vs bounded selfishness
assumption is that homo economicus’ only act in their own self-interest
however homo sapiens have bounded selfishness
humans do not always act in their own self-interest
they volunteer, give to charities, purchase Fairtrade products because of concerns about farmer’s well-being
self-will
assumption that consumer’s have perfect willpower
however homo sapiens have bounded self-control: the natural tendency to give in to temptations sometimes
dual system model
created by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky
according to this model, individuals have two different systems of thinking
system 1: fast thinking
system 2: slow thinking
Richard Thaler’s dual system
refers to system 1 as the automatic system and system 2 as the reflective system
Automatic system
involves fast decisions that are subconscious (gut instinct, impulsive)
leads to poor decision making (making short term decisions without considering long term effects)
Reflective System
involves slow decisions that are much more controlled (deliberate, logical)
Heuristics
mental rule of thumb/shortcut that allows people to make decisions and solve problems quickly and effectively
cognitive biases → can be problematic and result in poor decisions due to automatic thinking
list the cognitive biases
availability bias, anchoring bias, framing bias, social conformity/herd behaviour, status quo/inertia bias, loss aversion bias, hyperbolic discounting
availability bias
the availability of recent information and examples tend to over-influence people’s decision making
consumers are poor at assessing risk and probabilities, relying on recent examples rather than carefully examined data
anchoring bias
when we are given the value of something, and then use this value as a reference point to influence future choices/ decisions
overreliance
framing bias
the way information is presented to us influences our choices
90% fat free rather than containing 10% fat
social conformity/herd behaviour
natural tendency to want to fit in → others behaviour can exert a powerful influence on our choices
bandwagon effect: the behaviour of people when they join a perceived majority of people doing something, even if its against their best interests
status quo/inertia bias
consumers when faced with a bewildering set of choices, would prefer to maintain their status quo by doing nothing
loss aversion bias
human feel losses far more significantly than gains
hyperbolic discounting
tendency of humans to prefer short-term rewards over larger returns later
effect is more powerful when the reward is much further in the future
choice architecture
theory that the decisions that we make are heavily influenced by the ways in the choices are presented to us
items at cash register
default choice
mandated choice
nudge theory
developed by Richard Thaler
suggests that the choice architecture offered to people can be carefully designed to gently encourage (nudge) people to voluntarily choose the better option
key: maintain consumer sovereignty (their right to choose) but are encouraged to make better decisions
real world example: Save More Tomorrow → nudge to save money for pensions