1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What was China’s population problem before the policy?
1949: high birth rate encouraged
Population: 540m → 830m (in 20 years)
Pressure on food + resources
1959–61 famine: 15–30 million deaths
Shows Malthus theory (population > food supply)
What was China’s first attempt to reduce population?
Policy: later marriages, longer gaps, fewer children
Fertility rate: 5.7 → 2.9
Natural increase slowed
Population still reached 1 billion by 1980
1970, late, long few
What was the aim of the One Child Policy?
Reduce natural increase
Slow population growth
1979
How was the policy enforced?
1 child per couple
Incentives: better housing, healthcare, education
Punishments: fines, loss of benefits
Strict control: permits, monitoring, forced measures
How did the policy reduce population growth?
Fertility rate: 2.9 → 1.8
Fewer births → lower dependency ratio
More workers → boosted economy
What large-scale impacts did it have?
Prevented 300–400 million births
Less pressure on food, housing, services
Created demographic dividend
Large workforce, fewer dependents
Contributed to 9% economic growth (1990–2010)
What social issues did the policy cause?
Gender imbalance: ~30 million more men than women
Fewer women to marry
Caused by infanticide / sex-selective abortion
What other social impacts occurred?
‘Little emperor’ syndrome
Only children become dependent/spoilt
How did the policy affect age structure?
4:2:1 problem (1 child supports 2 parents + 4 grandparents)
Rising dependency ratio
Pressure on healthcare + economy
What future problems will China face?
Fewer workers → labour shortage
Ageing population → higher costs
Economic growth may slow
Was the One Child Policy successful?
Economically successful: reduced population growth + created demographic dividend
But caused serious social problems (gender imbalance, ageing)
Overall: only partly successful as long-term issues may outweigh benefits