1/102
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Metaphysics
deals with the nature of reality
space and time
human existence
technology and existence
abstract concepts
George Berkley
idealist
denied the existence of material things
believed reality consists of ideas and the minds that house them
Idealism
belief that all of reality is dependent and indistinguishable from the mind
reality is “ideal”
based on ideas of how things should be, whereas the real world is interpreted based on aspects like consciousness, perception, intellect, and reason
best case scenario
platonic realism
ideal forms of abstract concepts exist
e.g. perfect “form” of friendship exists ideally, even if it might not in reality
Thomas Hobbes
mechanic materialist
believed only material things were real
Materialism
only material things exist
rejects the idea that anything exists outside of the material world
the only thing that can truly be proven to exist is matter
phenomenal things like conscientiousness are a result of material reactions
nothing but matter and the void exist
Monism
reality consists of one all-encompassing thing
all particular things are manifestations of this one thing
e.g. everyone is an expression of God
Dualism
reality consists of 2 fundamentally different things
mind
matter
mental or emotional states have no material quality
Hylomorphism
all substance is made of a conceptual, non-literal matter and a more legitimate, physical form
bronze statue sculpted, the form changed but the matter didn’t
Naturalism
all beings and events that take place in our world are natural
nature is all there is
scientific investigation
limits itself to natural, material, and physical approaches
supernaturalism
belief in phenomena or entities that are beyond the laws of nature
the infinite
religious beliefs
magic and witchcraft
paranormal phenomena
the afterlife
unified reality theory
views reality as evolving form an absolute existence
this existence must have a consciousness that is the source of what we experience as physical reality
remains whole while differentiating into other forms
consciousness/existence becomes reality through forming relationships with itself
the dream argument
Rene Descartes
argued dreams are too easily confused with reality
Premise 1: dreams can often be confused with waking life
premise 2: dreams and waking life can have similar content
conclusions: there are no certain marks with which to distinguish dreams from reality
arguments against the dream argument
Hobbes & Locke
Hobbes said dreamers are usually unaware of absurdities in their dreams, but awake ppl can be certain they are awake due to a lack of absurdities
plato’s cave allegory
premise 1: if u were trapped in cave for entire life and could only see silhouettes, you view them as being real
premise 2: if you left cave and saw the real objects, you would gain greater understanding of reality and if you returned to cave and told others what you saw, they wouldn’t believe you
conclusions: our understanding of reality is limited to our experiences and ability to comprehend
brain in a vat
idea that ur connected to a computer and be living through a simulation
alien plugged brain into computer for research
premise 1: it would be impossible to prove ur not a brain in a vat, or remove self from the simulation
premise 2: you would only be experiencing the simulation and not know anything about the real world
conclusions: it is impossible to know for certain that you are experiencing the “real” world
the simulation argument
Nick Bostrom
premise 1: it is possible to simulate consciousness
premise 2: technological progress will continue
premise 3: advanced civilizations don’t destroy themselves
premise 4: advanced civilizations want to run simulations
conclusion: if the above premises are true, you are probably inside a simulation
ship of theseus
T had ship he used for adventuring
over span of 50 years, every part of the ship had been replaces with new ones
is his current ship the same one from 50 years ago?
twist from Hobbes: scavenger found all the og parts and reconstructed it - how would you define its identity?
cellular replacement
virtually every cell in human body is replaced ever 7-10 years
you do not share a single cell in common iwth you body from 10 years ago
Heraclitus on identity
no man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man
nothing retains the same identity
how philosophers describe identity
the relation that a thing bears only to itself
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
infidiscernibility of identicals
if any 2 things are identical, they must share all the same properties
Lumpl and Goliath
clay is formed into goliath (statue) and lumpl
it’s destroyed and formed back into a block of clay
it’s no longer G bc being a statue is part of its identity, but is still lumpl because its identity has no defined shape
fungibility
the property of being interchangeable with objects of the same kind
numerical identity
when 2 “different” identities share the same properties and are one and the same
e.g. peter parker (1a) and spiderman (1b)
you are a baby (1a) teenager (1b) and adult (1c)
qualitative identity
when 2 or more identical things share the same properties
GWL
e.g. sheets of paper, identical twins
Identical
two things that share an identity relation
body theory
personal identity persists over time bc you remain in the same body from birth to death
mad scientist thought experiment
Bernard Williams
you and I kidnapped by mad scientist
we switch mental content to each other’s bodies
you get to choose which body gets tortured and which body gets the cash
answer tells you what you think about identity
memory theory
personal identity persists over time because you retain memories of yourself at different points, and each of those memories is connected to one before it
theory of multiple intelligences
devised by Howard Gardner
musical (rhythmic and harmonic)
visual (spatial)
verbal linguistic
logical (mathematical)
bodily (kinesthetic)
interpersonal
intrapersonal
Rene Descartes on minds
argued that only human beings possessed minds + animals are biologically machines
The Turing test
Alan Turing - to determine whether computers could ever be able to “think” like a human
human questioner asks questions to both respondents, then determines which terminal is the computer and which is human
if mostly unable to tell, then the computer passes
The Chinese room
John Searle
states that computers may be able to simulate human-like responses but can’t demonstrate real understanding
conclusion: passing the turing test did not demonstrate real intelligence
libertarian free will
you have total control over your choices in life
Determinism
you are ultimately not in full control over your actions
hard determinism
all actions that occur are the result of previous actions, and therefore no free choices can be made
theological determinism
a creator or god has determined every event that will occur
predestination: god has already determined the afterlife that awaits you (calvinism)
soft determinism / compatibilism
our choices are strongly influences by previous actions, but some freedom and responsibility still exists
(middle ground btwn free will and determinism)
incompatibilism
free will and determinism are totally at odds with each other
Sam Harris
hard determinism
you were not free to choose that which did not occur to you to choose
free will = flawed and incoherent concept
illusion
people’s thoughts and intentions emerge from background causes
Steven Pinker
free will
the mind is a machine
free will = necessary illusion
decisions are made by neurophysiological processes in the brain that respect all the laws of physics
Daniel Dennett
compatibilism
we don’t just act for reasons; we represent our reasons
have free will due to bio evolution
responsibility due to sharing of wisdom?
Robert Sapolsky
hard determinism
in reality, no free will
all choices are influenced by variables
looking at variables can predict actions
we’re biological organisms: free will nothing but a myth
Michio Kaku
compatibilism
newtonian determinism
universe is a clock
what you’re going to eat 10 yrs from now has already been determined
Michael Gazzaniga
compatibilism
we can understand brains tot he nth degree but it’s not going to interfere with the fact that taking responsibility is on a social level??
personal responsibility
brains are automatic but ppl are free
can’t predict the way ppl act in social situations
tao te ching
first written text of taoism by lao tzu
the book of the way and its virtue
the Taijitu
yin-yang symbol
great pole / supreme ultimate
five parts:
wuji (infinite)
dualism (yin and yang)
wuxing - five agents (wood, fire, earth, metal, water)
conjunction of heaven and earth
unity / multiplicity
Lao Tzu’s 10 life lessons
look within and you will find everything you need
by letting go, you become free
let go of your labels if you truly want to know yourself
pay no attention to evil and it will crumble away
kindness and compassion for others will always win in the end
be yourself without caring what others think
wisdom and strength come from remaining humble
change is inevitable, so embrace it, even if it seems uncomfortable
lead to follow first if you ever wish to lead
always go with the flow
Buddhism
founded by Siddhartha Gautama (the buddha)
does not focus on the relationship btwn god and humanity
does not include a creator god
the 4 tenets of Buddhism
existence is unsatisfying
suffering is caused by craving and attachment
suffering can be ended by letting go of craving and reaching enlightenment
the path to enlightenment is trying to live in a state of enlightenment
Dukka
suffering
Trishna
carving and attachment
Nirodha / Nirvana
enlightenment
Magga
the path to enlightenment
confucianism
also called rusim
originated in 15th century BC China
focused on ethics, family, and social harmony
the 4 tenets of confucianism
ceremony is important
we should treat our parents with reverence
we should be obedient to honorable people
cultivated knowledge can be more important than creativity
theism
a religion based belief
e.g. believing in specific stories, dogma, rules, etc
deism
belief that a god or creator exists and is the creator of the world but plays no role beyond that
god plays no hand in our free will
atheism
belief that there are no gods
monotheism
belief in one god
polytheism
belief in multiple gods
agnosticism
can believe in god but doesn’t claim that god is or is not real
confused
pantheism
a worship that admits or tolerates all gods
pascal’s wager
if you believe in god and there is a god, eternal joy
if you believe in god and there is no god, nothing
if you don’t believe in god and there is a god, eternal suffering
if you don’t believe in god and there is no god, nothing
watchmaker anology
argument for intelligent design
the watchmaker is more complex than the watch
intelligent design
life on earth is so complex that science and the theory of evolution can’t explain it
must have been created by a superior entity or “designer”
aims to seek scientific confirmation of miraculous interventions
the unmoved mover
the being that sets all action in motion but does not move itself
Aristotle associated this concept with God bc an unmoved mover must be perfect
the invisible gardener
parable created by Antony Flew
garden = there’s a gardener
wait, but no one shows up, so gardener must be invisible
set up traps and dogs but nothing, no gardener must be invisible and intangible and unsmellable
what’s the difference btwn that and no gardener?
used to combat religion
says that religious people are just guessing and making things up
Anslem’s argument for the existence of God
god = that than which no greater can be conceived
smth can exist in our minds and also in reality
things in reality are always better than things in our imagination (only thing better than imagining living in Italy is actually living in Italy)
if god = the greatest thing that we can conjure in our minds, the only thing greater would be god in reality
Immanuel Kant on predicates
“existence is not a predicate”
predicates add to the essence of their subjects but can’t be used to explain their existence
all triangles that exist must have 3 sides but it could be that triangles don’t exist
the omni-god
omniscient: all-knowing
omnipotent: all-powerful
omnibenevolent: posessing perfect goodness
omnitemporal: exists in all places
omnipresent: exists at all times
divine impeccability
the idea that god can’t sin
even smth god does that a human would consider a sin isn’t a sin bc everything god does is good
analogical predication
we can’t predicate or assert anything about god bc he’s so far out of understanding, so we have to speak in analogies
like using cold to describe -10 celsius and absolute zero even though they are very different
no need to worry about these puzzles about god bc it’s impossible for us to understand
existentialism
a philosophy that explores the nature of existence through the mind and feelings of the individual in a world without god or meaning
emerged after ww2
angst
existentialist philosophy and ww2
lots of people died in ww2
academics who witnessed and survived the end of the war questioned how a just god could have allowed such pain, death, and suffering to happen to so many ppl
Heidegger
Sartre
Camus
Nietzsche
Kierkegaard
Martin Heidegger
German existentialist
wrote Being and Time
introduced concept of Dasein (being there / presence)
Heidegger’s 3 diseases of the soul
we have forgotten to notice we are alive
we have forgotten that all being is connected
we forget to be free and live for ourselves
das sein
being
the experience of being that is peculiar to humans
das nichts
the nothing
geworfenheit
thrown-ness
describes humans’ individual existences as being thrown into the world
das gerede
the chatter / they-self
idle talk, discourse
in idle convo, one only understands things superficially
eigentlichkeit
authenticity
living for ourselves
uneigentlichkeit
inauthenticity
you have lost or only seemingly achieved yourself
Albert Camus
French-Algerian existentialist
the absurd
realization that life is absurd in not an end but a beginning
you’ll never be happy if you look for what happiness consists of, and you will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life
the absurd
the struggle to find meaning and value in a world with no meaning or value
sisyphus
nihilism
belief that human values are baseless and life is meaningless
a more cynical and skeptical form of existentialism arguing that nothing matters
a nihilist’s philosophy on life
premise: all things are finite
premise: all things that are finite ultimately do not matter
conclusion: nothing matters
Friedrich Nietzsche
German nihilist
atheist
believed there were no absolute values in life
said god is dead - meaning our idea or belief of god has vanished from society
to live is to suffer, to survive is to find meaning in the suffering
Jean Paul Sartre
French philosopher
believed there was no god or creator
therefore humans had no essence (properties that define what we are)
humans are condemned to be free
everything has been figured out, except how to live
an optimistic nihilist’s view on life
premise: all things are finite
premise: things that are finite ultimately do not matter
conclusion: if nothing matters, ppl should live their lives freely and happily and not worry about things that don’t matter or can’t be changed
quantum mechanics
branch of science that describes the behavior of nature at the scale of atoms and subatomic particles
founded by Max Planck w/ his theory of quanta
quanta / quantum
the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction
wave-particle duality
concept that particles like electrons and photons can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like behavior
superposition
theory that quanta can exist in multiple states simultaneously
a quantum particle can be in a combination of different positions at the same time
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
it’s impossible to know both the velocity and position of a particle at the same time
the multiverse
premise: it is possible for quanta to exist in 2 different places at the same time
premise: it is possible for quanta to exist in 2 different states at the same time
conclusion: there is a potentially infinite and incalculable number of interactions happening, resulting in “infinite universes
Schrodinger’s cat
Ernest Schrodinger
a cat, flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box
don’t know if cat is alive or dead
everytime you look, the cat is either alive or dead
half the time, cat is alive, other half cat is dead
therefore before you open the box, cat is in a superposition where it’s both alive and dead
the position is not determined until you look at it
blackbody
the idea of a physical body that absorbs all the electromagnetic radiation that hits it, regardless of frequency of angle of incidence
the Rayleigh-Jeans law
higher the frequency and therefore shorter the wavelength, the higher the radiated intensity